Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
27 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-02-01
2022-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The NEUROlogically-impaired Extubation Timing Trial (NEURO-ETT)
NCT04291235
A Prospective Trial of Elective Extubation in Brain Injured Patients.
NCT00729261
Evaluation of Risk Factors Regarding Extubation Failure in Severe Brain Injured Patients.
NCT02426242
Intrinsic Respiratory Rate Assessment During Mechanical Ventilation to Accelerate Spontaneous Breathing and Extubation
NCT06445049
Monitoring Intercostal Muscles After Extubation
NCT02853201
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Extubation
Extubation by removal of endotracheal tube.
Extubation
This is an extubation by removal of endotracheal tube which must be done on the day of randomization or the following day. Any decision to subsequently reintubate the patient will be left to the discretion of the clinical team. Similarly, if a tracheostomy is deemed necessary in a patient who fails the extubation attempt, this will be managed at the discretion of the treating team. If for any reason the patient is not extubated according to the randomized schedule, the reason(s) will be recorded on a protocol violation form and the site investigator will be notified. If a patient receives a tracheostomy instead of being extubated we will again record reasons for this, but the patient will be analysed in the extubation group according to the intention-to-treat principle.
Usual care
The usual clinical practice is removal of the endotracheal tube (extubation), or insertion of tracheostomy, timed according to physicians' discretion
Usual Care
Patients in this group will be treated according to usual care, which may include extubation (removal of endotracheal tube) or insertion of a tracheostomy, timed according to physicians' discretion. The inclusion of this arm will allow prompt extubation to be compared to usual practice, which often involves further observation and delayed decision-making due to clinician uncertainty about the optimal airway management strategy. Incorporation of usual care arms has been promoted as a design feature to improve the safety and interpretability of critical care clinical trials.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Extubation
This is an extubation by removal of endotracheal tube which must be done on the day of randomization or the following day. Any decision to subsequently reintubate the patient will be left to the discretion of the clinical team. Similarly, if a tracheostomy is deemed necessary in a patient who fails the extubation attempt, this will be managed at the discretion of the treating team. If for any reason the patient is not extubated according to the randomized schedule, the reason(s) will be recorded on a protocol violation form and the site investigator will be notified. If a patient receives a tracheostomy instead of being extubated we will again record reasons for this, but the patient will be analysed in the extubation group according to the intention-to-treat principle.
Usual Care
Patients in this group will be treated according to usual care, which may include extubation (removal of endotracheal tube) or insertion of a tracheostomy, timed according to physicians' discretion. The inclusion of this arm will allow prompt extubation to be compared to usual practice, which often involves further observation and delayed decision-making due to clinician uncertainty about the optimal airway management strategy. Incorporation of usual care arms has been promoted as a design feature to improve the safety and interpretability of critical care clinical trials.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute brain injury (subarachnoid hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, seizure, traumatic brain injury, brain tumor, global cerebral anoxia/cardiac arrest, meningitis/encephalitis/cerebral abscess) that occurred within the previous 4 weeks.
* Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube for \> 72 hours
* Glasgow Coma Scale motor score 3 to 6 with improvement or no change from previous day
* passed spontaneous breathing trial (SBT)
Exclusion Criteria
* Quadriplegic
* Neuromuscular disease that will result in prolong need for mechanical ventilation, including but not limited to Guillain-Barre syndrome, cervical spinal cord injury, advanced multiple sclerosis
* Do-Not-Reintubate order in place
* Previously randomized in this trial
* Underlying pre-existing condition with expected mortality less than 6-months.
* Anticipated/scheduled for surgical procedures within 48 hours
* C-spine not yet cleared for activity as tolerated (cleared for activity as tolerated while wearing hard collar is acceptable)
* Currently known or suspected to have an difficult airway
* Absence of an endotracheal tube cuff leak, if checked
* Absence of spontaneous or induced cough
* Current enrolment in an RCT that precludes NEURO-ETT co-enrollment
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Damon Scales
MD, PhD, FRCPC
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Niall Ferguson, MD, MSc,
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Toronto General Hospital
Damon Scales, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Royal Columbian Hospital
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Hamilton General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
L'Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NEURO-ETT (Vanguard)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.