Weaning And Variability Evaluation

NCT ID: NCT01237886

Last Updated: 2017-07-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

660 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-11-30

Study Completion Date

2012-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Knowing when to liberate patients from mechanical ventilation (i.e. removal of breathing or endotracheal tube or extubation) is critically important, as both prolonged ventilation and failed extubation are both associated with harm and risk of death. Our objective is to improve the safety of extubation by harnessing hidden information contained in the patterns of variation of heart and respiratory rate measured over intervals-in-time. Currently, to assess a patient's ability to be extubated, a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) is routinely performed, where the level of ventilator support is reduced, and their response is observed in order to help predict if they will tolerate extubation (i.e. complete removal of ventilator support). Given that health is associated with a high degree of variation of physiologic parameters (e.g. heart and respiratory rate), and illness \& stress are associated with a loss of variability, the investigators aim to uncover the loss of variation as a measure of stress during SBT's. The investigators hypothesize that maintaining stable heart rate and respiratory rate variability (HRV and RRV) throughout the SBT will predict subsequent successful extubation, and conversely, a reduction in either HRV or RRV manifest during a SBT predicts extubation failure. A pilot study has demonstrated feasibility, and compelling preliminary results. A website, centralized data storage and analysis, and a trans-disciplinary team of scientists are in place to definitively test this novel technology. Determination of when to extubate critically ill patients remains a high-stakes clinical challenge; and improved prediction of extubation failure has potential to save lives and reduce costs in critically ill patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mechanically Ventilated Patients Extubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Invasive mechanical ventilation for \>48 hours,
* patient is ready for SBTs for assessment for extubation,
* has a normal sinus rhythm at time of SBT (no pacemaker),
* is tolerating pressure support ventilation ≤14 cm H2O (SpO2 ≥ 90% with FiO2 ≤ 40% and PEEP ≤ 10 cm H2O),
* hemodynamically stable (low or no vasopressors), stable neurological status (no deterioration in GCS during prior 24 hours \& ICP \< 20),
* intact airway reflexes (cough \& gag).

Exclusion Criteria

* Order not to re-intubate,
* anticipated withdrawal of life support,
* known or suspected severe weakness (myopathy, neuropathy or quadriplegia),
* tracheostomy,
* and prior extubation during ICU stay.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrew Seely, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Michigan Medical Center

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Billings Clinic

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Dartmouth Hitchcock Memorial Hospital

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Columbia University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University Hospitals of Cleveland

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Intermountain Medical Center/University of Utah School of Medicine

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

The University of British Columbia

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

The Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

The Ottawa Hospital-Civic Campus

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Mt Sinai

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Seely AJ, Bravi A, Herry C, Green G, Longtin A, Ramsay T, Fergusson D, McIntyre L, Kubelik D, Maziak DE, Ferguson N, Brown SM, Mehta S, Martin C, Rubenfeld G, Jacono FJ, Clifford G, Fazekas A, Marshall J; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group (CCCTG). Do heart and respiratory rate variability improve prediction of extubation outcomes in critically ill patients? Crit Care. 2014 Apr 8;18(2):R65. doi: 10.1186/cc13822.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24713049 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-569

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.