Oxygen Consumption (VO2), Effort, and Weaning in the Mechanically Ventilated Patient in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
NCT ID: NCT06391424
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-01-01
2026-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
High Flow Oxygen During Spontaneous Breathing Trial in Patients With High Weaning Risk Failure: Impact on the Weaning Course at D7 From the First Spontaneous Breathing Trial.
NCT03689309
Predictors Of Successful Extubation in Critically Ill Patients: Multicentre Observational Study
NCT03185962
Effect of a Personalized Weaning Strategy on Weaning Success
NCT05719194
Performance of the Variation in Arterial Lactatemia During a Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) in the Prediction of Extubation Failure
NCT05487573
Inspiratory Muscle Training in Difficult to Wean Patients
NCT03240263
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In addition, up to 20% of all Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients fail to wean from mechanical ventilation. Prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with half of the total time spent on the ICU. Improving the prediction of successful weaning provides physicians with a mean to optimize extubation timing, while reducing the incidence of premature extubation.
The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is a parameter commonly used to predict extubation success, next to some other clinical parameters such as consciousness level, the ability to cough and muscle strength. The most commonly used RSBI cut-off value for predicting save extubation incorrectly classifies 15% to 20% of patients. Which means that those patients require another period of mechanical ventilation with possible adverse consequences. It is therefore necessary to develop new parameters or indices aiding in the guidance of extubation timing.
Various other parameters, such as work of breathing (WOB), transpulmonary pressure swings (PS) and the pressure time product (PTP), which are manifestations of patient effort, have been investigated. Although a difference in transpulmonary pressure swings during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) has been linked to weaning failure, it has yet to be determined whether transpulmonary pressure swings predict extubation success or failure. For all these measures of effort the placement of an esophageal catheter is obligatory.
Oxygen consumption (VO2) is a direct manifestation of patient effort. It is defined as the difference between the amount of oxygen inhaled and exhaled over a predetermined time interval. Using end tidal oxygen (etO2) measurements and volumetric calculations, it is feasible to track VO2 variations breath-by-breath. A change in oxygen consumption during an SBT could be an early indicator of patient effort and failure.
The investigators hypothesize that VO2 measurement, together with indices of patient effort, could be valuable additional parameters when estimating weaning failure or success, and therefore, aid in the prediction of extubation success or failure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Spontaneous Breathing Trial
Patients who will undergo a spontaneous breathing trial
Spontaneous Breathing Trial
Patients will undergo an SBT to determine whether they are ready for extubation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Spontaneous Breathing Trial
Patients will undergo an SBT to determine whether they are ready for extubation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* \> 24 hours mechanically ventilated
* Eligible for a spontaneous breathing trial according to the clinical team
* Regular SBT ("Regulier SBT") according to the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) protocol
* Hemodynamically stable
* Esophageal Catheter in situ
Exclusion Criteria
* Heart failure (LVEF \<30%) if it results in a non regular SBT according to the LUMC protocol
* Known pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Leiden University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abraham Schoe, MD, PhD.
Intensivist, Department of Intensive Care, Principal Investigator, Associate professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Abraham Schoe, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Leiden University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Leiden University Medical Centre
Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Abraham Schoe, MD, PhD
Role: backup
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Trudzinski FC, Neetz B, Bornitz F, Muller M, Weis A, Kronsteiner D, Herth FJF, Sturm N, Gassmann V, Frerk T, Neurohr C, Ghiani A, Joves B, Schneider A, Szecsenyi J, von Schumann S, Meis J. Risk Factors for Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation and Weaning Failure: A Systematic Review. Respiration. 2022;101(10):959-969. doi: 10.1159/000525604. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
Beduneau G, Pham T, Schortgen F, Piquilloud L, Zogheib E, Jonas M, Grelon F, Runge I, Nicolas Terzi, Grange S, Barberet G, Guitard PG, Frat JP, Constan A, Chretien JM, Mancebo J, Mercat A, Richard JM, Brochard L; WIND (Weaning according to a New Definition) Study Group and the REVA (Reseau Europeen de Recherche en Ventilation Artificielle) Network double dagger. Epidemiology of Weaning Outcome according to a New Definition. The WIND Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar 15;195(6):772-783. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0320OC.
Epstein SK, Ciubotaru RL, Wong JB. Effect of failed extubation on the outcome of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1997 Jul;112(1):186-92. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.1.186.
Li F, Nie J, Lu Y, Tong TK, Yi L, Yan H, Fu FH, Ma S. The impact of intermittent exercise in a hypoxic environment on redox status and cardiac troponin release in the serum of well-trained marathon runners. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Oct;116(10):2045-51. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3460-5. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
Pham T, Telias I, Beitler JR. Esophageal Manometry. Respir Care. 2020 Jun;65(6):772-792. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07425.
Jubran A, Grant BJ, Laghi F, Parthasarathy S, Tobin MJ. Weaning prediction: esophageal pressure monitoring complements readiness testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Jun 1;171(11):1252-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200503-356OC. Epub 2005 Mar 11.
McClave SA, Kleber MJ, Lowen CC. Indirect calorimetry: can this technology impact patient outcome? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 1999 Jan;2(1):61-7. doi: 10.1097/00075197-199901000-00011.
Takala J, Keinanen O, Vaisanen P, Kari A. Measurement of gas exchange in intensive care: laboratory and clinical validation of a new device. Crit Care Med. 1989 Oct;17(10):1041-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198910000-00015.
Bellani G, Foti G, Spagnolli E, Milan M, Zanella A, Greco M, Patroniti N, Pesenti A. Increase of oxygen consumption during a progressive decrease of ventilatory support is lower in patients failing the trial in comparison with those who succeed. Anesthesiology. 2010 Aug;113(2):378-85. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e81050.
Smits FE, Rietveld PJ, Snoep JWM, van der Velde-Quist F, de Jonge E, Schoe A. P0.1 is an Unreliable Measure of Effort in Support Mechanical Ventilation in Comparison With Esophageal-Derived Measures of Effort: A Comparison Study. Crit Care Med. 2025 Aug 1;53(8):e1650-e1658. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006745. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
Smits FE, Rietveld PJ, Snoep JWM, van der Velde-Quist F, de Jonge E, Schoe A. Oxygen consumption, effort, and weaning in the mechanically ventilated patient in the intensive care unit: The extubate study: A protocol for an observational study. Respir Med. 2025 Feb;237:107949. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107949. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P23.068
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.