Oxygen Consumption (VO2), Effort, and Weaning in the Mechanically Ventilated Patient in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

NCT ID: NCT06391424

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In patients who are mechanically ventilated for more than 72 hours weaning failure is a common issue. The Spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) is often done to assess if the patient can be extubated with a high chance of success. However, re-intubation rates are between 15 - 20 % after a successful SBT. The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is an important parameter used in an SBT. Because the high incidence of extubation failure (re-intubation within 48 hours) a search for a better parameter than the RSBI is warranted. Using the measured end-tidal oxygen (etO2) of mechanically ventilated patients it is possible to calculate the VO2, which is a measure of patient effort. The VO2 is a parameter with the potential to predict weaning success or failure, together with other parameters of patient effort like the work of breathing (WOB), pressure time product (PTP) and esophageal pressure swings, reflecting muscle strength of the diaphragm. Therefore, the investigators want to investigate if these parameters are associated with an SBT success or failure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Weaning failure is a common problem in patients who are mechanically ventilated for more than 72 hours. Prediction of successful extubation is crucial for mechanically ventilated (MV) intensive care patients. Prolonged intubation leads to prolonged mechanical ventilation, which is known to have undesirable and detrimental effects. Premature extubation, on the other hand, is associated with clinical deterioration, a second episode of mechanical ventilation, and prolonged mechanical ventilation, resulting in multiple adverse outcomes.

In addition, up to 20% of all Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients fail to wean from mechanical ventilation. Prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with half of the total time spent on the ICU. Improving the prediction of successful weaning provides physicians with a mean to optimize extubation timing, while reducing the incidence of premature extubation.

The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is a parameter commonly used to predict extubation success, next to some other clinical parameters such as consciousness level, the ability to cough and muscle strength. The most commonly used RSBI cut-off value for predicting save extubation incorrectly classifies 15% to 20% of patients. Which means that those patients require another period of mechanical ventilation with possible adverse consequences. It is therefore necessary to develop new parameters or indices aiding in the guidance of extubation timing.

Various other parameters, such as work of breathing (WOB), transpulmonary pressure swings (PS) and the pressure time product (PTP), which are manifestations of patient effort, have been investigated. Although a difference in transpulmonary pressure swings during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) has been linked to weaning failure, it has yet to be determined whether transpulmonary pressure swings predict extubation success or failure. For all these measures of effort the placement of an esophageal catheter is obligatory.

Oxygen consumption (VO2) is a direct manifestation of patient effort. It is defined as the difference between the amount of oxygen inhaled and exhaled over a predetermined time interval. Using end tidal oxygen (etO2) measurements and volumetric calculations, it is feasible to track VO2 variations breath-by-breath. A change in oxygen consumption during an SBT could be an early indicator of patient effort and failure.

The investigators hypothesize that VO2 measurement, together with indices of patient effort, could be valuable additional parameters when estimating weaning failure or success, and therefore, aid in the prediction of extubation success or failure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness Intensive Care Unit Oxygen Consumption Weaning Failure Mechanical Ventilation Spontaneous Breathing Trial

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Spontaneous Breathing Trial

Patients who will undergo a spontaneous breathing trial

Spontaneous Breathing Trial

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patients will undergo an SBT to determine whether they are ready for extubation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spontaneous Breathing Trial

Patients will undergo an SBT to determine whether they are ready for extubation.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age above 18 years
* \> 24 hours mechanically ventilated
* Eligible for a spontaneous breathing trial according to the clinical team
* Regular SBT ("Regulier SBT") according to the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) protocol
* Hemodynamically stable
* Esophageal Catheter in situ

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (Gold class IV) if it results in a non regular SBT according to the LUMC protocol.
* Heart failure (LVEF \<30%) if it results in a non regular SBT according to the LUMC protocol
* Known pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Leiden University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Abraham Schoe, MD, PhD.

Intensivist, Department of Intensive Care, Principal Investigator, Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Abraham Schoe, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Leiden University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Leiden University Medical Centre

Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Leiden University Medical Center

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Florence E Smits, MSc

Role: CONTACT

+31 (0)71-5262164

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Abraham Schoe, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+31-715265018

Abraham Schoe, MD, PhD

Role: backup

Abraham Schoe, MD PhD

Role: primary

Florence E Smits, MSc

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Trudzinski FC, Neetz B, Bornitz F, Muller M, Weis A, Kronsteiner D, Herth FJF, Sturm N, Gassmann V, Frerk T, Neurohr C, Ghiani A, Joves B, Schneider A, Szecsenyi J, von Schumann S, Meis J. Risk Factors for Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation and Weaning Failure: A Systematic Review. Respiration. 2022;101(10):959-969. doi: 10.1159/000525604. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35977525 (View on PubMed)

Beduneau G, Pham T, Schortgen F, Piquilloud L, Zogheib E, Jonas M, Grelon F, Runge I, Nicolas Terzi, Grange S, Barberet G, Guitard PG, Frat JP, Constan A, Chretien JM, Mancebo J, Mercat A, Richard JM, Brochard L; WIND (Weaning according to a New Definition) Study Group and the REVA (Reseau Europeen de Recherche en Ventilation Artificielle) Network double dagger. Epidemiology of Weaning Outcome according to a New Definition. The WIND Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar 15;195(6):772-783. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0320OC.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27626706 (View on PubMed)

Epstein SK, Ciubotaru RL, Wong JB. Effect of failed extubation on the outcome of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1997 Jul;112(1):186-92. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.1.186.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9228375 (View on PubMed)

Li F, Nie J, Lu Y, Tong TK, Yi L, Yan H, Fu FH, Ma S. The impact of intermittent exercise in a hypoxic environment on redox status and cardiac troponin release in the serum of well-trained marathon runners. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Oct;116(10):2045-51. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3460-5. Epub 2016 Aug 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27572505 (View on PubMed)

Pham T, Telias I, Beitler JR. Esophageal Manometry. Respir Care. 2020 Jun;65(6):772-792. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07425.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32457170 (View on PubMed)

Jubran A, Grant BJ, Laghi F, Parthasarathy S, Tobin MJ. Weaning prediction: esophageal pressure monitoring complements readiness testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Jun 1;171(11):1252-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200503-356OC. Epub 2005 Mar 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15764727 (View on PubMed)

McClave SA, Kleber MJ, Lowen CC. Indirect calorimetry: can this technology impact patient outcome? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 1999 Jan;2(1):61-7. doi: 10.1097/00075197-199901000-00011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10453332 (View on PubMed)

Takala J, Keinanen O, Vaisanen P, Kari A. Measurement of gas exchange in intensive care: laboratory and clinical validation of a new device. Crit Care Med. 1989 Oct;17(10):1041-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198910000-00015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2676345 (View on PubMed)

Bellani G, Foti G, Spagnolli E, Milan M, Zanella A, Greco M, Patroniti N, Pesenti A. Increase of oxygen consumption during a progressive decrease of ventilatory support is lower in patients failing the trial in comparison with those who succeed. Anesthesiology. 2010 Aug;113(2):378-85. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e81050.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20613464 (View on PubMed)

Smits FE, Rietveld PJ, Snoep JWM, van der Velde-Quist F, de Jonge E, Schoe A. P0.1 is an Unreliable Measure of Effort in Support Mechanical Ventilation in Comparison With Esophageal-Derived Measures of Effort: A Comparison Study. Crit Care Med. 2025 Aug 1;53(8):e1650-e1658. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006745. Epub 2025 Jun 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40638487 (View on PubMed)

Smits FE, Rietveld PJ, Snoep JWM, van der Velde-Quist F, de Jonge E, Schoe A. Oxygen consumption, effort, and weaning in the mechanically ventilated patient in the intensive care unit: The extubate study: A protocol for an observational study. Respir Med. 2025 Feb;237:107949. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107949. Epub 2025 Jan 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39826764 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P23.068

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.