Ventilation Strategies During Spontaneous Breathing Trial

NCT ID: NCT02939963

Last Updated: 2025-09-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-23

Study Completion Date

2018-10-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients who are intubated and mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are at some point eligible for weaning. The common way to wean them from mechanical ventilation is to screen criteria for feasibility and, if present, to test feasibility by performing spontaneous breathing trial. This latter can be done either by setting a low pressure support level (expected to compensate the airflow resistance due to endotracheal tube) or by allowing the patient to breathe spontaneously through the tube without any support from the ventilator. Combination of low pressure assistance strategy (7 cm H2O) and positive expiratory pressure (PEP) of 4 cm H2O is the strategy used in our unit. Such a low pressure support level should actually result in a real assistance and, hence this is not the real spontaneous breathing capacity that is tested. Some ICU ventilators offer the option of compensating for the airflow resistance due to endotracheal tube, automatic tube compensation (ATC). Therefore, investigators aimed at comparing in patients ready to wean the usual procedure in our ICU and the ATC mode. In the ATC arm, the patients are breathing spontaneously through the endotracheal tube and are connected to the ventilator set at inspiratory pressure support of 0 cm H2O, PEP 4 cm H2O and ATC on.

Two parallel arms depending on the order of allocation of each mode: pressure support 7 cm H2O + PEP 4 cm H2O then ATC or the opposite. The primary endpoint is the power of the work of breathing. The hypothesis is that the power of the work of breathing is greater in ATC than in the usual procedure, and hence this latter is a real ventilator support.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Respiratory Insufficiency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ATC then pressure support 7 cm H2O PEP 4 cm H2O

spontaneous breathing through endotracheal tube with no ventilator support except for ATC

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ATC then pressure support 7 cm H2O PEP 4 cm H2O

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

spontaneous breathing through endotracheal tube with no ventilator support except for ATC, the patient is connected to the ventilator with pressure support 0 cm H2O and PEP 4 cm H2O during 30 minutes then 30 minutes of basal pressure support then 30 minutes with pressure support 7 cm H2O PEP 4 cm H2O

pressure support 7 cm H2O PEP 4 cm H2O then ATC

ventilator is set to pressure support ventilation mode at set pressure 7 cm H2O above PEEP level of 4 cm H2O

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pressure support 7 cm H2O PEP 4 cm H2O then ATC

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

30 minutes with pressure support 7 cm H2O PEP 4 cm H2O then 30 minutes of basal pressure support then 30 minutes with spontaneous breathing through endotracheal tube with no ventilator support except for ATC, the patient is connected to the ventilator with pressure support 0 cm H2O and PEP 4 cm H2O

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ATC then pressure support 7 cm H2O PEP 4 cm H2O

spontaneous breathing through endotracheal tube with no ventilator support except for ATC, the patient is connected to the ventilator with pressure support 0 cm H2O and PEP 4 cm H2O during 30 minutes then 30 minutes of basal pressure support then 30 minutes with pressure support 7 cm H2O PEP 4 cm H2O

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pressure support 7 cm H2O PEP 4 cm H2O then ATC

30 minutes with pressure support 7 cm H2O PEP 4 cm H2O then 30 minutes of basal pressure support then 30 minutes with spontaneous breathing through endotracheal tube with no ventilator support except for ATC, the patient is connected to the ventilator with pressure support 0 cm H2O and PEP 4 cm H2O

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age 18 years or more
* intubated and mechanically ventilated for at least 24 consecutive hours
* staying in the medical ICU at the Croix Rousse Hospital, Lyon, France
* pressure support ventilation 10-15 cm H2O, total respiratory rate 25-35 breaths/min, expired tidal volume 6-8 ml/kg predicted body weight
* meeting criteria for spontaneous breathing trial (able to answer simple questions, no ongoing intravenous sedation, norepinephrine ≤ 1 mg/H, dobutamine ≤ 20 mg/h, fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2 ≤ 50%), PEP ≤ 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate ≤ 35 breaths/min, saturation in oxygen (SpO2) ≥88%)
* under Dräger Evita XL ou V500 ICU ventilator
* agreement to participate from the patient or next of kin

Exclusion Criteria

* Chronic respiratory failure under long term home oxygen therapy and/or non invasive ventilation before ICU admission
* Tracheotomy
* nasogastric tube contra-indicated
* thoracic tube in place
* no agreement to participate
* under justice protection
* deprived of freedom
* pregnant or breastfeeding
* not affiliated to social insurance
* involved into another study that may interfere with present study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospices Civils de Lyon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Claude Guerin, Pr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital de la Croix Rousse

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Guerin C, Terzi N, Mezidi M, Baboi L, Chebib N, Yonis H, Argaud L, Heunks L, Louis B. Low-pressure support vs automatic tube compensation during spontaneous breathing trial for weaning. Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Dec 13;9(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0611-y.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31836913 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-A01172-49

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

69HCL16_0411

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.