Proportional Assist Ventilation Plus and Estimation of Respiratory Effort During the Transition to Spontaneous Ventilation

NCT ID: NCT06998927

Last Updated: 2025-06-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-01

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In intensive care units, many critically ill patients need help from a machine called a ventilator to breathe. Once these patients start to recover, doctors try to gradually reduce this support and help them breathe on their own again. However, not all patients are ready to be taken off the ventilator right away. During this transition, it's important to find the right amount of help-enough to support their breathing, but not so much that the machine does all the work for them.

This study focuses on a special type of ventilator setting called Proportional Assist Ventilation Plus (PAV+). Unlike traditional modes, which give a fixed level of support, PAV+ adjusts the amount of help it gives based on how hard the patient is trying to breathe. The more effort a patient makes, the more support the machine provides-and vice versa. This can make breathing feel more natural and may protect the lungs and breathing muscles during recovery.

Modern ventilators also display a measurement called "Work of Breathing," which tells how much effort the patient is using to breathe. This study wants to find out whether this measurement from the ventilator is a reliable way to monitor a patient's breathing effort, compared to other more invasive or complex methods.

The research will include 20 adult patients who are recovering in the ICU and have been on mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. All patients will have already met some criteria showing they're ready to begin breathing more on their own, but are not quite ready to have the breathing tube removed.

Each patient will go through different levels of PAV+ support, and researchers will record how much effort they make to breathe using several methods, including special pressure sensors and data from the ventilator.

The goal of the study is to better understand how to measure breathing effort safely and easily, and to improve how we support patients as they recover the ability to breathe on their own. If successful, this could help reduce complications and improve recovery for people on ventilators.

There are no added risks or costs for the patients involved. All equipment used in the study is already part of regular ICU care. Participation requires informed consent and the privacy of all participants will be fully protected.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Effort Proportional Assist Ventilation Work of Breathing

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

critically ill patients during the transition from controlled mechanical ventilation to spontaneous

Application of Proportional Assist Ventilation Plus (PAV+) at three support levels (20%, 50%, 70%) to assess ventilator-displayed work of breathing and its correlation with physiologic measures.

Intervention Type OTHER

This intervention is distinguished by applying Proportional Assist Ventilation Plus (PAV+) at three support levels (20%, 50%, 70%) within the same patient, allowing a stepwise analysis of its effect on work of breathing. It uses real-time ventilator-displayed work of breathing, a noninvasive and underexplored tool, correlated with multiple physiological parameters such as esophageal pressure, Pocc, and P0.1. This within-subject design controls for interindividual variability, improving the precision of the analysis. Focusing on patients with spontaneous respiratory effort facilitates clinical application to optimize personalized ventilatory support. Thus, the study provides novel data to adjust support levels according to the patient's actual effort and to validate ventilator measurements against reference physiological indicators.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Application of Proportional Assist Ventilation Plus (PAV+) at three support levels (20%, 50%, 70%) to assess ventilator-displayed work of breathing and its correlation with physiologic measures.

This intervention is distinguished by applying Proportional Assist Ventilation Plus (PAV+) at three support levels (20%, 50%, 70%) within the same patient, allowing a stepwise analysis of its effect on work of breathing. It uses real-time ventilator-displayed work of breathing, a noninvasive and underexplored tool, correlated with multiple physiological parameters such as esophageal pressure, Pocc, and P0.1. This within-subject design controls for interindividual variability, improving the precision of the analysis. Focusing on patients with spontaneous respiratory effort facilitates clinical application to optimize personalized ventilatory support. Thus, the study provides novel data to adjust support levels according to the patient's actual effort and to validate ventilator measurements against reference physiological indicators.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults (\>18 yrs) requiring invasive MV \>48 hrs
* Meeting spontaneous breathing transition criteria:

* Hemodynamic stability (NE \<0.1 μg/kg/min)
* Spontaneous breathing efforts
* RASS -2 to +1
* FiO₂ \<50% or PaO₂ \>60mmHg with PEEP ≤10cmH₂O
* Pre-existing esophageal balloon
* Tolerates spontaneous modes \>5 mins
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Meets extubation criteria
* Hemodynamic instability
* Psychomotor agitation (RASS \>+1)
* Bronchopleural fistula
* Severe weakness (MRC \<36)
* Neuromuscular disease
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Argentinian Intensive Care Society

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gustavo Plotnikow

Head of Physical and Respiratory Care Department, ICU

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires

CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Arellano DH, Brito R, Morais CCA, Ruiz-Rudolph P, Gajardo AIJ, Guinez DV, Lazo MT, Ramirez I, Rojas VA, Cerda MA, Medel JN, Illanes V, Estuardo NR, Bruhn AR, Brochard LJ, Amato MBP, Cornejo RA. Pendelluft in hypoxemic patients resuming spontaneous breathing: proportional modes versus pressure support ventilation. Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Dec 20;13(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01230-w.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38117367 (View on PubMed)

Spinazzola G, Ferrone G, Costa R, Festa O, Piastra M, Bello G, Amato MF, Rossi M, Conti G. "Evaluation of Different Inspiratory Efforts in a Pediatric Model of Healthy Lung and Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome During Optimized Pressure Support Ventilation and Proportional Assist Ventilation Plus (PAV+): A Bench Study. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 Mar;60(3):e71027. doi: 10.1002/ppul.71027.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 40042134 (View on PubMed)

Gerson EAM, Dominelli PB, Leahy MG, Kipp S, Guenette JA, Archiza B, Sheel AW. The effect of proportional assist ventilation on the electrical activity of the human diaphragm during exercise. Exp Physiol. 2023 Feb;108(2):296-306. doi: 10.1113/EP090808. Epub 2022 Nov 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36420595 (View on PubMed)

Fazio SA, Lin G, Cortes-Puch I, Stocking JC, Tokeshi B, Kuhn BT, Adams JY, Harper R. Work of Breathing During Proportional Assist Ventilation as a Predictor of Extubation Failure. Respir Care. 2023 Aug;68(8):1049-1057. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10225. Epub 2023 May 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37160340 (View on PubMed)

Amargiannitakis V, Gialamas I, Pediaditis E, Soundoulounaki S, Prinianakis G, Vaporidi K, Akoumianaki E, Proklou A, Alexopoulou C, Georgopoulos D, Kondili E. Validation of a Proposed Algorithm for Assistance Titration During Proportional Assist Ventilation With Load-Adjustable Gain Factors. Respir Care. 2020 Jan;65(1):36-44. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06988. Epub 2019 Sep 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31530626 (View on PubMed)

Bertoni M, Telias I, Urner M, Long M, Del Sorbo L, Fan E, Sinderby C, Beck J, Liu L, Qiu H, Wong J, Slutsky AS, Ferguson ND, Brochard LJ, Goligher EC. A novel non-invasive method to detect excessively high respiratory effort and dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2019 Nov 6;23(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2617-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31694692 (View on PubMed)

de Vries HJ, Tuinman PR, Jonkman AH, Liu L, Qiu H, Girbes ARJ, Zhang Y, de Man AME, de Grooth HJ, Heunks L. Performance of Noninvasive Airway Occlusion Maneuvers to Assess Lung Stress and Diaphragm Effort in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients. Anesthesiology. 2023 Mar 1;138(3):274-288. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004467.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36520507 (View on PubMed)

Sassoon CS, Light RW, Lodia R, Sieck GC, Mahutte CK. Pressure-time product during continuous positive airway pressure, pressure support ventilation, and T-piece during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Mar;143(3):469-75. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/143.3.469.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2001053 (View on PubMed)

Charlson ME, Charlson RE, Peterson JC, Marinopoulos SS, Briggs WM, Hollenberg JP. The Charlson comorbidity index is adapted to predict costs of chronic disease in primary care patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;61(12):1234-1240. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.01.006. Epub 2008 Jul 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18619805 (View on PubMed)

Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10. doi: 10.1007/BF01709751. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8844239 (View on PubMed)

Baydur A, Behrakis PK, Zin WA, Jaeger M, Milic-Emili J. A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Nov;126(5):788-91. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.5.788.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7149443 (View on PubMed)

Hermans G, Clerckx B, Vanhullebusch T, Segers J, Vanpee G, Robbeets C, Casaer MP, Wouters P, Gosselink R, Van Den Berghe G. Interobserver agreement of Medical Research Council sum-score and handgrip strength in the intensive care unit. Muscle Nerve. 2012 Jan;45(1):18-25. doi: 10.1002/mus.22219.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22190301 (View on PubMed)

Beloncle F, Akoumianaki E, Rittayamai N, Lyazidi A, Brochard L. Accuracy of delivered airway pressure and work of breathing estimation during proportional assist ventilation: a bench study. Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0131-y. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27076185 (View on PubMed)

Vaporidi K, Psarologakis C, Proklou A, Pediaditis E, Akoumianaki E, Koutsiana E, Chytas A, Chouvarda I, Kondili E, Georgopoulos D. Driving pressure during proportional assist ventilation: an observational study. Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Jan 3;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0477-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30603960 (View on PubMed)

Akoumianaki E, Prinianakis G, Kondili E, Malliotakis P, Georgopoulos D. Physiologic comparison of neurally adjusted ventilator assist, proportional assist and pressure support ventilation in critically ill patients. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2014 Nov 1;203:82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Aug 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25169117 (View on PubMed)

Schmidt M, Kindler F, Cecchini J, Poitou T, Morawiec E, Persichini R, Similowski T, Demoule A. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist and proportional assist ventilation both improve patient-ventilator interaction. Crit Care. 2015 Feb 25;19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0763-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25879592 (View on PubMed)

Doorduin J, Sinderby CA, Beck J, van der Hoeven JG, Heunks LM. Assisted Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Lung-distending Pressure and Patient-Ventilator Interaction. Anesthesiology. 2015 Jul;123(1):181-90. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000694.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25955983 (View on PubMed)

Suarez-Sipmann F; Acute Respiratory Failure Working Group of the SEMICYUC. New modes of assisted mechanical ventilation. Med Intensiva. 2014 May;38(4):249-60. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2013.10.008. Epub 2014 Feb 5. English, Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24507472 (View on PubMed)

Jubran A, Van de Graaff WB, Tobin MJ. Variability of patient-ventilator interaction with pressure support ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Jul;152(1):129-36. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.1.7599811.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7599811 (View on PubMed)

Dianti J, Fard S, Wong J, Chan TCY, Del Sorbo L, Fan E, Amato MBP, Granton J, Burry L, Reid WD, Zhang B, Ratano D, Keshavjee S, Slutsky AS, Brochard LJ, Ferguson ND, Goligher EC. Strategies for lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a physiological trial. Crit Care. 2022 Aug 29;26(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04123-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36038890 (View on PubMed)

Xirouhaki N, Kondili E, Mitrouska I, Siafakas N, Georgopoulos D. Response of respiratory motor output to varying pressure in mechanically ventilated patients. Eur Respir J. 1999 Sep;14(3):508-16. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14c06.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10543268 (View on PubMed)

Alberti A, Gallo F, Fongaro A, Valenti S, Rossi A. P0.1 is a useful parameter in setting the level of pressure support ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 1995 Jul;21(7):547-53. doi: 10.1007/BF01700158.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7593895 (View on PubMed)

Kataoka J, Kuriyama A, Norisue Y, Fujitani S. Proportional modes versus pressure support ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Dec 10;8(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0470-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30535648 (View on PubMed)

MacIntyre NR. Respiratory function during pressure support ventilation. Chest. 1986 May;89(5):677-83. doi: 10.1378/chest.89.5.677.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3698697 (View on PubMed)

Esteban A, Ferguson ND, Meade MO, Frutos-Vivar F, Apezteguia C, Brochard L, Raymondos K, Nin N, Hurtado J, Tomicic V, Gonzalez M, Elizalde J, Nightingale P, Abroug F, Pelosi P, Arabi Y, Moreno R, Jibaja M, D'Empaire G, Sandi F, Matamis D, Montanez AM, Anzueto A; VENTILA Group. Evolution of mechanical ventilation in response to clinical research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan 15;177(2):170-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200706-893OC. Epub 2007 Oct 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17962636 (View on PubMed)

Plotnikow GA, Gogniat E, Accoce M, Navarro E, Dorado JH; EpVAr study group. Epidemiology of mechanical ventilation in Argentina. The EpVAr multicenter observational study. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2022 Jul;46(7):372-382. doi: 10.1016/j.medine.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35660286 (View on PubMed)

Esteban A, Anzueto A, Alia I, Gordo F, Apezteguia C, Palizas F, Cide D, Goldwaser R, Soto L, Bugedo G, Rodrigo C, Pimentel J, Raimondi G, Tobin MJ. How is mechanical ventilation employed in the intensive care unit? An international utilization review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 May;161(5):1450-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9902018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10806138 (View on PubMed)

Beduneau G, Pham T, Schortgen F, Piquilloud L, Zogheib E, Jonas M, Grelon F, Runge I, Nicolas Terzi, Grange S, Barberet G, Guitard PG, Frat JP, Constan A, Chretien JM, Mancebo J, Mercat A, Richard JM, Brochard L; WIND (Weaning according to a New Definition) Study Group and the REVA (Reseau Europeen de Recherche en Ventilation Artificielle) Network double dagger. Epidemiology of Weaning Outcome according to a New Definition. The WIND Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar 15;195(6):772-783. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0320OC.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27626706 (View on PubMed)

Perez J, Accoce M, Dorado JH, Gilgado DI, Navarro E, Cardoso GP, Telias I, Rodriguez PO, Brochard L. Failure of First Transition to Pressure Support Ventilation After Spontaneous Awakening Trials in Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Influence of COVID-19. Crit Care Explor. 2023 Aug 25;5(9):e0968. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000968. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37644972 (View on PubMed)

Ely EW, Baker AM, Dunagan DP, Burke HL, Smith AC, Kelly PT, Johnson MM, Browder RW, Bowton DL, Haponik EF. Effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation of identifying patients capable of breathing spontaneously. N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 19;335(25):1864-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199612193352502.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8948561 (View on PubMed)

Girard TD, Kress JP, Fuchs BD, Thomason JW, Schweickert WD, Pun BT, Taichman DB, Dunn JG, Pohlman AS, Kinniry PA, Jackson JC, Canonico AE, Light RW, Shintani AK, Thompson JL, Gordon SM, Hall JB, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW. Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008 Jan 12;371(9607):126-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60105-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18191684 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRIHB 12048

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.