Proportional Assist Ventilation for Minimizing the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation: The PROMIZING Study

NCT ID: NCT02447692

Last Updated: 2025-05-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

575 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-14

Study Completion Date

2024-07-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

For adult patients with acute respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, does a ventilation strategy using proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors (PAV+) result in a shorter duration of time spent on mechanical ventilation than a ventilation strategy using pressure support ventilation (PSV)?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with acute respiratory failure require mechanical ventilation to help them breathe until they recover from their acute illness. Although mechanical ventilation is necessary to sustain life in such situations, it can induce weakness of the respiratory muscles which may lead to prolonged dependence on the ventilator. Prolonged dependence on mechanical ventilation is associated with increased mortality, morbidity and costs to the healthcare system. Thus, a main goal of assisted mechanical ventilation is to reduce the patient's respiratory distress while maintaining some respiratory muscle activity. To attain this goal, the amount of ventilator assistance should theoretically be adjusted to target normal or reasonable levels of respiratory effort.

Modes of Mechanical Ventilation:

Proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors (PAV+) is a mode of mechanical ventilation which delivers assistance to breathe in proportion to the patient's effort. The proportional assistance, called the gain, can be adjusted by the clinician to maintain the patient's respiratory effort or workload within a reasonable range. This is the only mode of ventilation which allows for measurement and targeting of a specific range of respiratory muscle activity by the patient.

Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is a mode of ventilation which is considered the current standard of care for assisting breathing of patients during the recovery phase of acute respiratory failure. Several studies have shown short term advantages of PAV over PSV, including improved patient-ventilator synchronization, improved adaptability to changes in patient effort, and improved sleep quality.

Goal of this Randomized Controlled Trial:

To demonstrate that for patients with acute respiratory failure, ventilation with PAV+, being more physiological, will result in a shorter duration of time spent on mechanical ventilation than ventilation with PSV.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critically Ill Acute Respiratory Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PSV ventilation strategy

The control is the standard of care PSV ventilation strategy, designed to adjust the level of support according to usual clinical parameters.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PSV ventilation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

An algorithm for adjusting the level of pressure support according to usual clinical parameters; patients not tolerating PSV will be switched to Assist/Control mode according to predefined criteria

PAV+ ventilation strategy

The intervention is a PAV+ ventilation strategy, designed to adjust the level of support (gain) to target a predefined range of respiratory muscle pressure.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PAV+ ventilation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

An algorithm for adjusting the level of support (gain) to maintain a predefined range of respiratory muscle pressure; patients not tolerating PAV+ (Puritan Bennett™ 840 or 980 ventilator) will be switched to Assist/Control mode according to predefined criteria

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PSV ventilation strategy

An algorithm for adjusting the level of pressure support according to usual clinical parameters; patients not tolerating PSV will be switched to Assist/Control mode according to predefined criteria

Intervention Type OTHER

PAV+ ventilation strategy

An algorithm for adjusting the level of support (gain) to maintain a predefined range of respiratory muscle pressure; patients not tolerating PAV+ (Puritan Bennett™ 840 or 980 ventilator) will be switched to Assist/Control mode according to predefined criteria

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A1. Age 18 years or older
* A2. Intubated and receiving any mode of invasive mechanical ventilation ≥ 24 hours


* B1. Ability or potential ability to trigger ventilator breaths (i.e. not receiving neuromuscular blockade).
* B2. On Assist/Control volume-cycled ventilation: Technically satisfactory plateau pressure ≤ 30 cm H2O (see Operations Manual) OR On Assist/Control pressure-controlled ventilation or similar mode: Pressure control plus PEEP ≤ 30 cm H2O OR On Pressure Support ventilation: Pressure support plus PEEP ≤ 30 cm H2O OR On Proportional Assist ventilation: PAV gain \<85%
* B3. PaO2 ≥ 60 mmHg or SpO2 ≥ 90% on FiO2 ≤ 0.60 and PEEP ≤ 15 cm H2O
* B4. Metabolic disorders corrected: pH ≥7.32
* B5. Stable hemodynamic status: stable or decreasing doses of vasopressors for ≥6 hours
* B6. Anticipate ongoing need for ventilation \>24 hours

* B10. Patient transferred to a non-participating centre

B. ENROLMENT DEFERRAL CRITERIA:

* B11. Plan to extubate/discontinue mechanical ventilation within \<24 hours (Reassess within 24 hours)
* B12. Patient currently on ECMO (Reassess patient once off ECMO)
* C9: Plan for surgery or complex procedure that will require full ventilation to be done prior to attempting extubation (e.g. Procedure requiring neuromuscular blockade and/or heavy sedation, such that patient would be apneic, or not be able to trigger ventilator) (Reassess after surgery/procedure complete)

C. PRESSURE SUPPORT TRIAL INCLUSION CRITEIRA:

* C2. Upon review of Screening and Enrolment criteria (A and B), the patient still passes.
* C3. Treating physician has provided verbal consent to proceed with standardized tests and randomization if eligibility criteria are met.

C. PRESSURE SUPPORT TRIAL DEFERRAL CRITERIA:

* C6. High dose vasopressor requirements (i.e. epinephrine or norepinephrine \>0.5 ug/kg/min or equivalent) OR patient requiring an increase in dose of vasopressor within 6 hrs
* C7. Active cardiac ischemia (dynamic ST changes on monitor or ECG within 6 hours)
* C8. Unstable arrhythmias (HR\>140 or \<50) with clinical signs of low cardiac output or or SBP\<80 mmHg
* C10. Receiving a "strict lung protective" ventilation strategy for ARDS (eg. Order on chart to keep Vt ≤6 mL/kg PBW)


* C1. Patient/SDM has provided consent OR Plan to obtain deferred consent as Patient incapable and no SDM available to provide consent within the randomization window
* E1. Upon review of Criteria A, B, and C, the patient still passes and the patient has passed the PST.
* E2. Does not meet Weaning Criteria OR Fails the ZERO CPAP Trial OR Fails the SBT

* C4. Patient/SDM has declined consent
* C5. Patient incapable and no SDM available to provide consent (not applicable if plan to obtain deferred consent)
* E3. Passed SBT on t-piece, FiO2 0.40 for 30-120 minutes
* E4. Approval withdrawn (by physician or patient/SDM)

Exclusion Criteria

* A3. Anticipating withdrawal of life support and/or shift to palliation as the goal of care
* A4. Severe central neurologic disorder (eg. Hemorrhage, stroke, tumour) causing elevated intracranial pressure, or impaired control of breathing, or requiring specific ventilator adjustments (i.e. To attain specific CO2 target) or requiring neurosurgical intervention
* A5. Known or suspected severe or progressive neuromuscular disorder likely to result in prolonged or chronic ventilator dependence (eg. Guillain-Barré syndrome, Myasthenia Gravis, ALS, MS, high spinal cord injury, kyphoscoliosis or other restrictive disorder) (Note that obesity hypoventilation syndrome that may be managed with nocturnal non-invasive ventilation is NOT an exclusion under A5)
* A6. Severe COPD: Baseline daytime hypercapnia (pCO2\> 50 mmHg) OR GOLD 4 airflow limitation (FEV1\<30% predicted) OR MRC class 4 symptoms ("I am too breathless to leave the house" OR "I am breathless when dressing")
* A7. Broncho-pleural fistula
* A8. Tracheostomy present at ICU admission for the purpose of chronic or prolonged mechanical ventilation (\>21 days). (Note that a patient who was endotracheally intubated for acute respiratory failure and received a tracheostomy during their ICU admission, prior to enrolment, is not excluded under A8).
* A9. Current enrolment in a confounding study, as assessed by the steering committee
* A10. Previous randomization in the PROMIZING Study
* A11. Severe, end-stage, irreversible respiratory or cardiac disease (e.g. interstitial lung disease, pulmonary fibrosis, cardiomyopathy, valvulopathy) likely to result in prolonged or chronic ventilator dependence /unlikely to wean from mechanical ventilation \[Note: patients who are candidates for intervention to treat the underlying respiratory/cardiac disease (e.g. lung transplant, heart transplant, cardiac surgery) may be re-evaluated once intervention is complete and they no longer meet criteria A11.\]


* B7. Extubated
* B8. Died

• C12. Treating physician has declined consent

D. WEANING CRITERIA:

* D1. SpO2≥ 90% on FiO2 ≤0.40 and PEEP ≤8 cmH2O
* D2. pH ≥7.32
* D3. Vasopressor requirements no higher than norepinephrine 0.1 ug/kg/min or equivalent.

In the final stage (E), patients will be considered eligible for randomization if the following criteria are met.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Critical Care Trials Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karen J Bosma

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada

Laurent Brochard

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

El Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas "Norberto Quirno"

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Kingston General Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Victoria Hospital

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook Hospital - Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

North York General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

UHN- Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

UHN- Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Royal Victoria Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Institut Universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Quebec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Henri Mondor (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris)

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière

Paris, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Rouen

Rouen, , France

Site Status

University Hospital of Heraklion

Heraklion, , Greece

Site Status

University Hospital of Ferrara

Ferrara, , Italy

Site Status

San Giovanni Battista University Hospital

Turin, , Italy

Site Status

King Abdulaziz Medical City

Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Hospital de Sant Pau

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina Canada France Greece Italy Saudi Arabia Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bosma KJ, Burns KEA, Martin CM, Skrobik Y, Mancebo Cortes J, Mulligan S, Lafreniere-Roula M, Thorpe KE, Suarez Montero JC, Moran Chorro I, Rodriguez-Farre N, Butler R, Bentall T, Beduneau G, Enguerrand P, Santos M, Piraino T, Spadaro S, Montanaro F, Basmaji J, Campbell E, Mercat A, Beloncle FM, Carteaux G, Maraffi T, Charbonney E, Lecronier M, Dres M, Arabi YM, Amaral ACK, Marinoff N, Adhikari NKJ, Geagea A, Shin P, Vaporidi K, Kondili E, Shahin J, Campisi J, Rodriguez PO, Setten M, Goligher EC, Ferguson ND, Fanelli V, Ferreyra G, Lellouche F, Sibley S, Brochard L; PROMIZING Study Investigators, the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, and the REVA Network. Proportional-Assist Ventilation for Minimizing the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2025 Sep 18;393(11):1088-1103. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2505708. Epub 2025 Jun 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40513024 (View on PubMed)

Bosma KJ, Lafreniere-Roula M, Jiang A, Heath A, Ouyang Y, Wade K, Hu P, Burns KEA, Martin CM, Skrobik Y, Mulligan S, Thorpe KE, Brochard L; members of the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group and the REVA Network. Proportional Assist Ventilation for Minimizing the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation (the PROMIZING study): update to the statistical analysis plan for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024 Dec 30;25(1):855. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08669-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39736673 (View on PubMed)

Bosma KJ, Martin CM, Burns KEA, Mancebo Cortes J, Suarez Montero JC, Skrobik Y, Thorpe KE, Amaral ACK, Arabi Y, Basmaji J, Beduneau G, Beloncle F, Carteaux G, Charbonney E, Demoule A, Dres M, Fanelli V, Geagea A, Goligher E, Lellouche F, Maraffi T, Mercat A, Rodriguez PO, Shahin J, Sibley S, Spadaro S, Vaporidi K, Wilcox ME, Brochard L; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group and; REVA Network. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of Proportional Assist Ventilation for Minimizing the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation: the PROMIZING study. Trials. 2023 Mar 27;24(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07163-w.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36973743 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan: Original

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan: Updated

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-022-04063-4

The PROMIZING trial enrollment algorithm for early identification of patients ready for unassisted breathing

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IPR-327433, ISR-2014-10481

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.