Two Modes of Mechanical Ventilation for Intensive Care Patients With Low Blood Oxygen Due to Breathing Difficulties

NCT ID: NCT06140056

Last Updated: 2025-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-12-08

Study Completion Date

2025-09-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study examines individuals admitted to the intensive care unit due to breathing difficulties resulting in not getting enough oxygen into their bodies. These patient will receive mechanical ventilation and this study aims to determine how the pressure inside the lungs changes when using two different modes of mechanical ventilation. The goal is to improve management and care of breathing difficulties by gaining insight into changes in lung pressure during mechanical ventilation, as well as comparing the effectiveness of the two ventilator modes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

As hypoxic respiratory failure is an acute condition, this trial will enrol temporarily incompetent patients and obtain consent from the patient's next of kin and an independent medical doctor (trial guardian) as soon as possible after enrolment.

When included in the study, patients will be randomized 1:1 centrally in the RedCap system, using a computer-generated concealed assignment sequence, with permuted blocks of varying sizes, to start with either the intervention (APRV) followed by control (volume controlled mechanical ventilation) or control followed by intervention.

Esophageal manometry will be used as a surrogate to measure the transpulmonary pressure. Arterial blood gasses, blood samples and lung ultrasound will be used to investigate oxygenation, ventilation and aeration.

Treatment targets for both groups during the study are pH \>7.20, saturation ≥ 88% and PaO2 ≥ 8.0 kPa, with FiO2 titrated as low as possible while complying to the oxygenation targets (PaO2 and saturation).

Both arms start with an 'adjustment phase' where the ventilator is adjusted so the respiratory values are within the targets. The intervention adjustment phase is at least 30 minutes. The adjustments will follow standardized protocols.

When the respiratory values are within range, the 'observation period begins' and no changes are made to the ventilator for 3 hours, unless it is necessary to achieve ventilatory treatment targets or deemed necessary by the treating physician. During the trial, the patient must be positioned in a supine position with the headboard elevated 0-30 degrees.

After the first 'observation period', the patient is switched to the opposite ventilation mode and will go through an 'adjustment phase' and 'observation period' again.

Once a patient regains competence, they will be provided with both written and oral information regarding the trial

By comparing volume controlled mechanical ventilation and APRV and their transpulmonary pressures, valuable insight can be gained regarding optimal ventilation strategy for patients with hypoxic respiratory failure. Understanding how various ventilation modes influence transpulmonary pressure and their potential effects on respiratory mechanics can potentially inform designs of trials with individualized respiratory care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypoxic Respiratory Failure Ventilators, Mechanical

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Duration: 3 hours

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Volumen controlled mechanical ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Mechanical ventilation mode

Intervention

Duration: 3 hours

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Airway pressure release ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Mechanical ventilation mode

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Airway pressure release ventilation

Mechanical ventilation mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Volumen controlled mechanical ventilation

Mechanical ventilation mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Admitted to the ICU
* Invasive mechanical ventilation with FiO2 ≥ 50% OR PaO2-to-FiO2 ratio \<20 kPa, including PEEP 3 5 cmH20 for at least 6 hours

* Severe bronchospasm, defined as warranting treatment aimed at reversing this i.e. inhalation of anticholinergic or bronchodilator beyond what the patient normally use
* Emphysema where treating physician judges the patient at increased risk for pneumothorax from APRV
* Restrictive lung disease defined as a pre-admission diagnosis of restrictive lung disease
* Undrained pneumothorax
* Hemodynamic instability defined as more than 0.20 microgram/kg/min of norepinephrine or any dose of adrenaline infusion to maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg
* Age \< 18 years
* Patients who have received APRV previously during the current ICU admission
* Patients in prone position within the last 24 hours
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Theis S. Itenov

Sponsor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Theis S Itenov, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bispebjerg Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Hvidovre Hospital

Hvidovre, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-23050947

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.