Strategy of UltraProtective Lung Ventilation With Extracorporeal CO2 Removal for New-Onset Moderate to seVere ARDS
NCT ID: NCT02282657
Last Updated: 2017-08-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
95 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-11-30
2017-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Enhanced Lung Protective Ventilation With ECCO2R During ARDS
NCT03525691
Use of Extracorporeal CO2 Removal in Case of Moderate to Severe ARDS to Apply an Ultraprotective Mechanical Ventilation Strategy
NCT04556578
ECCO2R - Mechanical Power Study
NCT03939260
Ultra-Protective Lung Ventilation With Extracorporeal CO2 Removal for Moderate ARDS
NCT04903262
Correction by ECCO2-R of Hypercapnia in Patients With DVP in Moderate to Severe ARDS Under Protective Ventilation.
NCT03303807
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) may be used in association with mechanical ventilation to permit VT reduction to \<6 ml/kg and to achieve very low Pplat (20-25 cm H2O). In an observational study conducted in the 80's, Gattinoni showed that use of venovenous ECCO2R at a flow of 1.5-2.5 l/min in addition to quasi apneic mechanical ventilation with peak inspiratory pressures limited to 35-45 cmH2O and PEEP set at 15-25 cmH2O resulted in lower than expected mortality in an observational cohort of severe ARDS patients. However, a randomized, controlled single-center study using that same technology and conducted in the 1990s by Morris's group in Utah was stopped early for futility after only 40 patients had been enrolled and failed to demonstrate a mortality benefit with this device (58% in the control group vs. 70% in the treatment group).
In recent years, new-generation ECCO2R devices have been developed. They offer lower resistance to blood flow, have small priming volumes and have much more effective gas exchange. With ECCO2R the patient's PaCO2 is principally determined by the rate of fresh gas flow through the membrane lung. In an ECCO2R animal model, CO2 removal averaged 72±1.2 mL/min at blood flows of 450 mL/min, while CO2 production by the lung decreased by 50% with reduction of minute ventilation from 5.6 L/min at baseline to 2.6 L/min after insertion of the device. Lastly, Terragni et al (15)demonstrated that ECCO2R could improve pulmonary protection by allowing very low tidal volume ventilation (3.5-5 ml/kg of PBW) in a proof-of-concept study of ten patients with ARDS. This strategy was also associated with a significant decrease in pulmonary inflammatory biomarkers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
One single arm
Procedure: Baseline ventilator settings will be established per the EXPRESS protocol: VT = 6 mL/kg (ideal body weight); inspiratory flow will be set at 50-70 L/min resulting in an end-inspiratory pause of 0.2-0.5 sec, I:E ratio 1:1 to 1:3, PEEP set so that the plateau pressure (Pplat), measured during the end-inspiratory pause of 0.2 to 0.5 s, will be within the following limits: 28 cm H2O ≤ Pplat ≤ 30 cm H2O; Set RR to 20-35 to maintain approximately the same minute ventilation as before study initiation. Baseline ventilator settings will be maintained for a 2-hour run-in time (time to setup ECCO2R devices). Use heated humidifiers for gas humidification and minimize instrumental dead space. ECCO2R will be initiated during the 2-hour run-in time. Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) will be used. EtCO2 will be monitored. RR will be kept what it was at Baseline. Sweep gas flow will be adapted. Ventilation will be adapted. Respiratory rate will be adapted.
ECCO2R will be initiated during the 2-hour run-in time
A single (15.5 to 19 Fr) veno-venous ECCO2R catheter will be inserted percutaneously (jugular vein strongly suggested).
Catheters should be rinsed with heparinized saline solution before insertion Once the catheter has been inserted each line will be filled with an heparinized saline solution before its connection to the extracorporeal circuit The ECCO2R circuit will be connected to the catheter and blood flow set, depending on the device, up to 1000 mL/min.
Initially, sweep gas flow through the ECCO2R device will be set at zero (0 LPM) such as to not initiate CO2 removal through the device.
Anticoagulation will be maintained with unfractionated heparin to a target aPTT of 1.5 - 2.0X baseline. A bolus of heparin is suggested at the time of cannulation.
Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA)
Patients will receive NMBA starting in the run-in period and continued for the first 24 hours and thereafter will be directed by the attending physician
Ventilation
Following the 2-hour run-in time, VT will be reduced gradually to 5 mL/kg. Sweep gas initiated then VT decreased to 4.5 then 4 mL/kg and PEEP adjusted to reach 23 ≤ Pplat ≤ 25 cm H2O.
Level of carbon dioxide released at the end of expiration
EtCO2 will be monitored for safety purposes. Blood gases will be analyzed 20-30 minutes after each VT reduction
Respiratory Rate
RR will be kept what it was at baseline
Sweep gas flow
Sweep gas flow will be adapted to maintain the same EtCO2
Ventilation will be adapted
If PaCO2\> 75 mmHg and/or pH \< 7.2, despite respiratory rate of 35/min and optimized ECCO2R, VT will be increased to the last previously tolerated VT.
Respiratory rate will be adapted
If PaCO2 remains within the target range, respiratory rate will be progressively decreased to a minimum of 15/ min and facilitated by increases in sweep flow.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ECCO2R will be initiated during the 2-hour run-in time
A single (15.5 to 19 Fr) veno-venous ECCO2R catheter will be inserted percutaneously (jugular vein strongly suggested).
Catheters should be rinsed with heparinized saline solution before insertion Once the catheter has been inserted each line will be filled with an heparinized saline solution before its connection to the extracorporeal circuit The ECCO2R circuit will be connected to the catheter and blood flow set, depending on the device, up to 1000 mL/min.
Initially, sweep gas flow through the ECCO2R device will be set at zero (0 LPM) such as to not initiate CO2 removal through the device.
Anticoagulation will be maintained with unfractionated heparin to a target aPTT of 1.5 - 2.0X baseline. A bolus of heparin is suggested at the time of cannulation.
Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA)
Patients will receive NMBA starting in the run-in period and continued for the first 24 hours and thereafter will be directed by the attending physician
Ventilation
Following the 2-hour run-in time, VT will be reduced gradually to 5 mL/kg. Sweep gas initiated then VT decreased to 4.5 then 4 mL/kg and PEEP adjusted to reach 23 ≤ Pplat ≤ 25 cm H2O.
Level of carbon dioxide released at the end of expiration
EtCO2 will be monitored for safety purposes. Blood gases will be analyzed 20-30 minutes after each VT reduction
Respiratory Rate
RR will be kept what it was at baseline
Sweep gas flow
Sweep gas flow will be adapted to maintain the same EtCO2
Ventilation will be adapted
If PaCO2\> 75 mmHg and/or pH \< 7.2, despite respiratory rate of 35/min and optimized ECCO2R, VT will be increased to the last previously tolerated VT.
Respiratory rate will be adapted
If PaCO2 remains within the target range, respiratory rate will be progressively decreased to a minimum of 15/ min and facilitated by increases in sweep flow.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Moderate ARDS according to the Berlin definition(16) PaO2/FiO2: 200-100 mmHg, with PEEP ≥ 5 cmH2O
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Decompensated heart insufficiency or acute coronary syndrome
* Severe COPD
* Major respiratory acidosis PaCO2\>60 mmHg
* Acute brain injury
* Severe liver insufficiency (Child-Pugh scores \>7) or fulminant hepatic failure
* Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
* Contraindication for systemic anticoagulation
* Patient moribund, decision to limit therapeutic interventions
* Catheter access to femoral vein or jugular vein impossible
* Pneumothorax
* Platelet \<50 G/l
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alain COMBES, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
La pitié-Salpétrière Hospital
Marco RANIERI, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Turin S.Giovanni Battista Molinette Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
selected ICUs for the pilot phase
Different Locations and Several Countries, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dreyfuss D, Ricard JD, Saumon G, (2003) On the physiologic and clinical relevance of lung-borne cytokines during ventilator-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167: 1467-1471. Rouby JJ, Puybasset L, Nieszkowska A, Lu Q, (2003) Acute respiratory distress syndrome: lessons from computed tomography of the whole lung. Crit Care Med 31: S285-295. Dreyfuss D, Saumon G, (1998) Ventilator-induced lung injury: lessons from experimental studies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157: 294-323. Frank JA, Parsons PE, Matthay MA, (2006) Pathogenetic significance of biological markers of ventilator-associated lung injury in experimental and clinical studies. Chest 130: 1906-1914. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. (2000) Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 342: 1301-1308. Terragni PP, Rosboch G, Tealdi A, Corno E, Menaldo E, Davini O, Gandini G, Herrmann P, Mascia L, Quintel M, Slutsky AS, Gattinoni L, Ranieri VM, (2007) Tidal hyperinflation during low tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175: 160-166. Hager DN, Krishnan JA, Hayden DL, Brower RG, (2005) Tidal volume reduction in patients with acute lung injury when plateau pressures are not high. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 172: 1241-1245. Needham DM, Colantuoni E, Mendez-Tellez PA, Dinglas VD, Sevransky JE, Dennison Himmelfarb CR, Desai SV, Shanholtz C, Brower RG, Pronovost PJ, (2012) Lung protective mechanical ventilation and two year survival in patients with acute lung injury: prospective cohort study. BMJ 344: e2124. Feihl F, Eckert P, Brimioulle S, Jacobs O, Schaller MD, Melot C, Naeije R, (2000) Permissive hypercapnia impairs pulmonary gas exchange in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162: 209-215.
Combes A, Fanelli V, Pham T, Ranieri VM; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Trials Group and the "Strategy of Ultra-Protective lung ventilation with Extracorporeal CO2 Removal for New-Onset moderate to severe ARDS" (SUPERNOVA) investigators. Feasibility and safety of extracorporeal CO2 removal to enhance protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: the SUPERNOVA study. Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):592-600. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05567-4. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SUPERNOVA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.