pRotective vEntilation With Veno-venouS Lung assisT in Respiratory Failure
NCT ID: NCT02654327
Last Updated: 2022-03-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
1120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-12
2022-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Strategy of UltraProtective Lung Ventilation With Extracorporeal CO2 Removal for New-Onset Moderate to seVere ARDS
NCT02282657
Retrospective Cohort Study of Low-Flow Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal (ECCO2R) System: Evaluating ECCO2R's Efficacy and Safety in Participants With Respiratory Failure
NCT07161271
Enhanced Lung Protective Ventilation With ECCO2R During ARDS
NCT03525691
Autotitrating Versus Standard Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) in Acute Exacerbation of Respiratory Failure
NCT01174316
Ultra-protective Pulmonary Ventilation Supported by Low Flow ECCO2R for Severe ARDS
NCT02252094
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The few interventions that have been shown to reduce the high mortality in these patients have targeted ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). A landmark trial by the ARDSNet trials group found that ventilating patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure secondary to ARDS with a lung protective strategy aiming for a reduced tidal volume of 6ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) and a maximum end-inspiratory plateau pressure (Pplat) ≤ 30cmH2O decreased mortality from 40% (in the conventional arm treated with tidal volume less than 12ml/kg PBW) to 31%.
Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) in association with mechanical ventilation offers a potentially attractive solution to permit tidal volume reduction to less than 6ml/kg PBW and to achieve low plateau pressures (\< 25cmH2O). Using these extracorporeal circuits, carbon dioxide can be 'dialysed' out of the blood while the lungs are ventilated in a more protective manner. In recent years, more efficient veno-venous devices have become available. These have replaced arterio-venous devices and have the advantage of not requiring arterial puncture. These can achieve carbon dioxide removal with relatively low extracorporeal blood flows (0.4-1 l/min) requiring only a smaller dual lumen venous catheter. In addition these ECCO2R devices use more biocompatible materials making the device more resistant to clot formation and cause less platelet and clotting factor consumption. Therefore only minimal systemic anticoagulation is required which reduces the likelihood of bleeding complications. These devices are now comparable to renal dialysis equipment, which is routinely used safely as standard care in ICUs in the United Kingdom.
Together this highlights the need for a large randomised controlled trial to establish whether VV-ECCO2R in acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure can allow the use of a more protective ventilatory strategy and is associated with improved patient outcomes. Importantly, if there was no benefit, the trial would provide evidence to stop the widespread adoption of an expensive and ineffective or potentially harmful treatment in this setting.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Care
Standard care with conventional lung protective mechanical ventilation
No interventions assigned to this group
ECCO2R to enable lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation
VV-ECCO2R to enable lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation (target tidal volume of ≤ 3ml/kg predicted body weight and a Pplat ≤ 25cmH20)
VV-ECCO2R to enable lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation
In the intervention arm a dual lumen catheter will be inserted into a central vein. VV-ECCO2R is commenced and managed as per study manual. Tidal volumes are then reduced on mechanical ventilation to enable lower tidal volume ventilation. Lower tidal volume facilitated by VV-ECCO2R will continue for a least 2 days up to a maximum of 7 days
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
VV-ECCO2R to enable lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation
In the intervention arm a dual lumen catheter will be inserted into a central vein. VV-ECCO2R is commenced and managed as per study manual. Tidal volumes are then reduced on mechanical ventilation to enable lower tidal volume ventilation. Lower tidal volume facilitated by VV-ECCO2R will continue for a least 2 days up to a maximum of 7 days
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute and potentially reversible cause of acute respiratory failure as determined by the treating physician
* Within 48 hours of the onset of hypoxemia as defined by Pa02/Fi02 less than or equal to 20kPA
Exclusion Criteria
* Intubated and mechanically ventilated via an endotracheal or tracheostomy tube ≥ 7 days (168 hours) up to the time of randomisation
* Ability to maintain Vt to ≤ 3ml/kg PBW while maintaining pH ≥ 7.2 as determined by the treating physician
* Receiving, or decision to commence, ECMO in the next 24 hours
* Mechanical ventilation using high frequency oscillation ventilation or airway pressure release ventilation
* Untreated pulmonary embolism, pleural effusion or pneumothorax as the primary cause of acute respiratory failure
* Acute respiratory failure fully explained by left ventricular failure or fluid overload (May be determined by clinical assessment or echocardiography/cardiac output monitoring)
* Left ventricular failure requiring mechanical support
* Contra-indication to limited systemic anticoagulation with heparin
* Unable to obtain vascular access to a central vein (internal jugular or femoral vein)
* Consent declined
* Treatment withdrawal imminent within 24 hours
* Patients not expected to survive 90 days on basis of premorbid health status
* DNAR (Do Not Attempt Resuscitation) order (excluding advance directives) in place
* Severe chronic respiratory disease requiring domiciliary ventilation (except for sleep disordered breathing)
* Severe chronic liver disease (Child Pugh \>11)
* Platelet count \< 40,000 mm3 (Prior to catheter insertion)
* Previously enrolled in the REST trial
* Prisoners
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Queen's University, Belfast
OTHER
Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit
OTHER
Belfast Health and Social Care Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Professor Danny McAuley
Professor of Intensive Care Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Belfast Health and Social Care Trust
Belfast, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
Fitzgerald M, Millar J, Blackwood B, Davies A, Brett SJ, McAuley DF, McNamee JJ. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for patients with acute respiratory failure secondary to the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2014 May 15;18(3):222. doi: 10.1186/cc13875.
Terragni PP, Del Sorbo L, Mascia L, Urbino R, Martin EL, Birocco A, Faggiano C, Quintel M, Gattinoni L, Ranieri VM. Tidal volume lower than 6 ml/kg enhances lung protection: role of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Anesthesiology. 2009 Oct;111(4):826-35. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b764d2.
Bein T, Weber-Carstens S, Goldmann A, Muller T, Staudinger T, Brederlau J, Muellenbach R, Dembinski R, Graf BM, Wewalka M, Philipp A, Wernecke KD, Lubnow M, Slutsky AS. Lower tidal volume strategy ( approximately 3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal versus 'conventional' protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: the prospective randomized Xtravent-study. Intensive Care Med. 2013 May;39(5):847-56. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2787-6. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
Boyle AJ, Reddy K, Conlon J, Auzinger G, Bannard-Smith J, Barrett NA, Camporota L, Gillies MA, Jackson C, McDowell C, Patel B, Perkins GD, Szakmany T, Tunnicliffe W, Welters ID, McNamee JJ, McAuley DF, O'Kane CM. Evaluation of Plasma Biomarkers to Understand the Biology and Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect in Lower Tidal Volume Ventilation Facilitated by Extracorporeal CO2 Removal in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the REST Trial. Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 27;7(4):e1246. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001246. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
Agus A, McNamee JJ, Jackson C, McAuley DF. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal compared to ventilation alone in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: cost-utility analysis of the REST RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2023 Aug;29(33):1-34. doi: 10.3310/FCDQ8036.
Boyle AJ, McDowell C, Agus A, Logan D, Stewart JD, Jackson C, Mills J, McNamee JJ, McAuley DF. Acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure after treatment with lower tidal volume ventilation facilitated by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal: long-term outcomes from the REST randomised trial. Thorax. 2023 Aug;78(8):767-774. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2022-218874. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
McNamee JJ, Gillies MA, Barrett NA, Perkins GD, Tunnicliffe W, Young D, Bentley A, Harrison DA, Brodie D, Boyle AJ, Millar JE, Szakmany T, Bannard-Smith J, Tully RP, Agus A, McDowell C, Jackson C, McAuley DF; REST Investigators. Effect of Lower Tidal Volume Ventilation Facilitated by Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal vs Standard Care Ventilation on 90-Day Mortality in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: The REST Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Sep 21;326(11):1013-1023. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13374.
Stokes JW, Gannon WD, Rice TW. Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Why Should We Care? Crit Care Med. 2021 May 1;49(5):e546-e547. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004844. No abstract available.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13/143/02
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
15084DMcA-AS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.