Physiological Response to Heliox21 and Air O2

NCT ID: NCT01498432

Last Updated: 2011-12-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

38 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a non-commercial study to explore the use of Heliox21 in a new patient cohort. The fundamental aim is to assess the therapeutic benefits of Heliox21 and practicalities of gas delivery in patients who require non-invasive ventilatory support following extubation on the Intensive Care Unit. Thus, the investigators aim to extend our knowledge of the potential role for Heliox21 in the post-extubation environment of the Intensive Care Unit. The purpose of this study is to answer a specific, clinically relevant question. That is whether Heliox21 helps to reduce the effort of breathing in the period following withdrawal of mechanically assisted ventilation in patients on the intensive care unit.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Failure to wean from mechanical ventilatory support occurs when the magnitude of respiratory system loading exceeds its capacity to respond. Extubation success depends on the condition being resolved or improved. Gas exchange capacity, respiratory muscle strength, laryngeal function and cough strength, nutritional status and psychological state can all lead to extubation failure. However, efforts to reduce the work of breathing might offer an alternative strategy.

Studies recently carried out in both paediatric and adult populations disclose the serious consequences of failed extubation, namely prolonged intensive care and hospital stays, greater mortality rates and increased care costs.

Gas flow in an airway can be either laminar or turbulent. There needs to be a greater pressure differential to drive a turbulent flow than a laminar one. Helium is an inert gas with no systemic biological effects (at standard temperature and pressure).

The low density and viscosity of Helium means that its substitution for nitrogen in air allows laminar flow to be maintained at much higher flow rates, and flow rates to be maintained at much lower working pressures (5). As a result, the use of helium-oxygen mixtures (Heliox21) has potential to reduce work of breathing, and also to limit dynamic gas trapping through increased cavity emptying, and altered lung mechanics/ forced expiratory pressures. As a result, Heliox21 has been used as a respiratory therapeutic bridge for over 30 years, with demonstrable advantage in the management of conditions including tracheal obstruction and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

In theory, the use of Heliox21 should reduce work of breathing by improving the balance between work demand and capacity during the process of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. In general studies of the use of Heliox21 after extubation have been limited. Thus, we aim to extend our knowledge of the potential role for Heliox21 in the post-extubation environment of the Intensive Care Unit. Whilst Heliox21 has generally been administered through a simple face-mask (+/- rebreathing bag), the development of the HAMILTON G5 AVEA ventilator now allows the accurate administration of Heliox21 (21% helium/79% oxygen) with defined inspired fractional oxygen concentrations. This advent offers the means to safely administer helium as an adjunct to non-invasive ventilatory support.

Main inclusion criteria:

All patients with a predicted requirement for post extubation non-invasive ventilatory support continuous positive airway pressure/bilevel positive airway pressure/noninvasive ventilation(CPAP/BiPAP/NIV) will be eligible.

The primary outcome measure:

The difference between the frequency to tidal volume (f/VT) ratio\* after four hours of Heliox21 and the f/VT ratio after four hours of Air O2.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Insufficiency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Heliox21

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Heliox21

Intervention Type DRUG

For Heliox21 the percentage of O2 will match the percentage of O2 prior to extubation, and Helium will make up the remainder (e.g. Helium 65% + O2 35%), and the O2 concentration will be titrated as their clinical condition indicates (as O2 increases Helium will decrease and vice versa).

Air O2

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Air O2

Intervention Type DRUG

For Air-O2 the percentage of O2 delivered will match the patient's percentage of O2 prior to extubation, and will be titrated as their clinical condition indicates.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Heliox21

For Heliox21 the percentage of O2 will match the percentage of O2 prior to extubation, and Helium will make up the remainder (e.g. Helium 65% + O2 35%), and the O2 concentration will be titrated as their clinical condition indicates (as O2 increases Helium will decrease and vice versa).

Intervention Type DRUG

Air O2

For Air-O2 the percentage of O2 delivered will match the patient's percentage of O2 prior to extubation, and will be titrated as their clinical condition indicates.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adults aged ≥ 18 years
2. Males
3. Females
4. Any patient requiring mechanical ventilation for 5 days or more and/or has a tracheostomy to assist weaning from mechanical ventilation who has one or more of following risk factors suggesting that they are at risk of needing post extubation continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), BiLevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV):

* BMI of 28 or more
* Underlying respiratory disease (including asthma, COPD and bronchiectasis) as documented in medical notes for this current hospital admission.
* SpO2 \< 95% on 35% FiO2 or more
* Smoker
* Ex-smoker less than 12 months
* Ex-smoker 10 pack year\* or more history \* Pack year = (Number of cigarettes per day X Number of years) ÷ 20

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age \< 18 years
2. Patient/legal representative refusal or inability to consent
3. Adults with learning disabilities/ dementia
4. Any contraindication to non-invasive ventilation:

Inability to use mask (trauma/surgery) Excessive secretions Haemodynamic instability/life threatening arrhythmia
5. High risk of aspiration:

* Impaired mental status (Detained under the Mental Health Act)
* Un-co-operative/agitated patient
* Life threatening refractory hypoxemia
* Undrained pneumothorax
* Bullae on X-Ray
* Recent upper GI anastamosis
6. Patients already enrolled in an interventional
7. Females known to be pregnant
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University College, London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chris Hargreaves

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

Daniel S Martin

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University College, London

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Daniel S Martin

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 02077940500

Email: [email protected]

Paula M Meale

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 02077940500

Email: [email protected]

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-009599-11

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

08/0339

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id