Body Lateralization and Its Effects on Respiratory Drive, Ventilation, and Pulmonary Aeration in Critically Ill Patients

NCT ID: NCT07323472

Last Updated: 2026-01-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-01

Study Completion Date

2027-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this quasi-experimental study is to investigate how different body positions, performed through Automatic Lateralization Therapy, affect respiratory drive, ventilation, and pulmonary aeration in critically ill adult patients under mechanical ventilation. The main questions this study aims to answer are:

* Does Automatic Lateralization Therapy, modify respiratory drive, as measured by P0.1, estimated Pmus, and sEMG of the diaphragm and parasternal muscles?
* Is there an association between respiratory drive, ventilation, and pulmonary aeration measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) in different body positions promoted by Automatic Lateralization Therapy ?

Does combining Automatic Lateralization Therapy, with Flow Bias improve physiological and functional outcomes compared to Automatic Lateralization Therapy, without Flow Bias?

Participants will:

* Be positioned in different lateralization strategies using Automatic Lateralization Therapy, while under mechanical ventilation;
* Have respiratory parameters and ventilation images assessed by EIT and sEMG;

Participate only during their ICU stay, with no need for additional visits after discharge.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Detailed Description:

Critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation frequently develop respiratory complications due to immobility and altered pulmonary mechanics. Automatic Lateralization Therapy has emerged as a promising physiologic intervention to optimize ventilation and reduce respiratory dysfunction in this population. However, its effects on respiratory drive activation remain poorly understood.

Objective:

To evaluate the effects of body lateralization on respiratory drive activation, ventilation, and pulmonary aeration in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

Methods and Design:

This is a quasi-experimental, non-randomized physiological intervention study conducted in a controlled ICU environment, following the TREND 2025 Statement Checklist for transparent reporting of non-randomized evaluations. Automatic Lateralization Therapy will be applied with and without Flow Bias, using progressive body tilt angles (0°, 15°, and 30°). Positioning strategies will be personalized based on Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) findings to ensure optimal lung recruitment and safety.

Collected data will include:

Clinical and physiological parameters such as respiratory drive (P0.1, estimated Pmus),

Diaphragm and parasternal muscle activity via surface electromyography (sEMG),

Ventilatory mechanics and gas exchange,

Pulmonary aeration and regional ventilation distribution assessed by EIT,

Additional monitoring by lung ultrasound to confirm aeration patterns.

The investigator performing the physiological data analysis will be blinded to the intervention group to minimize bias. Cardiorespiratory safety (e.g., hemodynamic stability, oxygenation) and adverse events will be monitored throughout all procedures.

Expected Outcomes:

The study aims to provide insights into whether body lateralization through Automatic Lateralization Therapy, modulates respiratory drive and improves ventilation efficiency in critically ill patients. It is hypothesized that combining Automatic Lateralization Therapy, with Flow Bias will enhance pulmonary expansion, respiratory drive activation, and gas exchange efficiency compared to Automatic Lateralization Therapy, alone, while maintaining patient safety.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intensive Care Units (ICUs)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Quasi-experimental study with a non-randomized physiological interventional design in a single group of critically ill adult patients under mechanical ventilation. Each participant will undergo all intervention conditions, including different body lateralization angles (0°, 15°, 30°) with Automatic Lateralization Therapy with and without Flow Bias. Repeated measures will include respiratory drive, ventilation, and pulmonary aeration assessed by P0.1, estimated Pmus, sEMG, EIT, and ultrasound, allowing each participant to serve as their own control.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Apart from the participants and the researchers responsible for data analysis, no other role is blinded in the study.

The researchers responsible for carrying out the interventions and conducting the study are not blinded to the intervention conditions.

Blinding is applied only to:

* Participants: sedated and, therefore, unaware of the intervention received.
* Researchers responsible for data analysis: blinded to the intervention conditions during the evaluation of physiological and ventilatory parameters.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Supine Positioning

Participants will remain in supine position with 30° head elevation. No lateralization therapy is applied.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Supine Positioning

Intervention Type OTHER

During this analysis phase, patients will be positioned on a Multicare bed (LINET) in the dorsal decubitus position with the head of the bed elevated to 30°. Data will be collected on hemodynamic monitoring, respiratory drive, respiratory mechanics, degree of lung involvement, regional distribution of ventilation and aeration, and gas exchange.

Automatic lateralization therapy

Participants will undergo continuous lateral positioning on an automated bed, with automatic angle and time adjustments. The second sequence will be combined with the Flow Bias intervention.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Automatic Lateralization Therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

During this phase of analysis and intervention related to lateral positioning, patients will be maintained on a Multicare bed (LINET) and subjected to personalized lateral positioning based on the morphofunctional pattern detected by electrical impedance tomography. This positioning will be performed using automatic lateralization therapy, programmed for unilateral or bilateral application, continuously alternating between angles of 0°, 15°, and 30°, maintained for 20 minutes at each position. The procedure will be conducted in two sequences, with the second sequence combined with the Flow Bias intervention. At each angle, data will be collected on hemodynamic monitoring, respiratory drive, respiratory mechanics, regional distribution of ventilation and aeration, and gas exchange.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Automatic Lateralization Therapy

During this phase of analysis and intervention related to lateral positioning, patients will be maintained on a Multicare bed (LINET) and subjected to personalized lateral positioning based on the morphofunctional pattern detected by electrical impedance tomography. This positioning will be performed using automatic lateralization therapy, programmed for unilateral or bilateral application, continuously alternating between angles of 0°, 15°, and 30°, maintained for 20 minutes at each position. The procedure will be conducted in two sequences, with the second sequence combined with the Flow Bias intervention. At each angle, data will be collected on hemodynamic monitoring, respiratory drive, respiratory mechanics, regional distribution of ventilation and aeration, and gas exchange.

Intervention Type OTHER

Supine Positioning

During this analysis phase, patients will be positioned on a Multicare bed (LINET) in the dorsal decubitus position with the head of the bed elevated to 30°. Data will be collected on hemodynamic monitoring, respiratory drive, respiratory mechanics, degree of lung involvement, regional distribution of ventilation and aeration, and gas exchange.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Continuous lateral positioning Automatic patient positioning Continuous lateral rotation therapy Lateral rotation therapy Continuous rotational therapy Kinetic bed therapy Lateral change Positioning Automated lateral rotation Rotating bed Automatic lateral therapy Kinetic Therapy Automated Lateral Rotation Therapy Supine Semi-recumbent position Recumbent position Dorsal decubitus Conventional supine care

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients of both sexes will be included;
* Aged ≥ 18 years;
* BMI 18-35 kg/m²;
* Under invasive mechanical ventilation via orotracheal tube for ≥ 24 hours and expected to remain on mechanical ventilatory support for at least 48 hours;
* Sedated (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale \[RASS\] -1 to -4);
* Well adapted to protective ventilation strategies in VCV or PSV modes;
* Presenting neural respiratory drive evidenced by a drop in Delta Pocc and/or the presence of assisted cycles;
* Hemodynamically stable (mean arterial pressure between 60-120 mmHg, systolic arterial pressure between 90-180 mmHg, diastolic arterial pressure between 60-100 mmHg, and heart rate between 50-150 bpm) with or without vasoactive drugs at the time of data collection (\> 0.1 to 0.3 mcg/kg/min);
* Respiratory stability, no use of accessory muscles and target SpO₂ achieved;
* No indication for nebulization or heated humidification at the time of collection;
* Positive tolerance test for lateral decubitus positioning;
* Chest circumference of 78-87.9 cm (XS), 88-99.9 cm (S), or 100-111.9 cm (M).

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients presenting medical restrictions to body repositioning, or to the use of EIT or sEMG;
* Those in therapeutic failure;
* Individuals with spinal cord injury, brain injury, or stroke with a history of functional loss and respiratory impairment prior to hospitalization;
* Neurological diseases affecting respiratory myoelectric conduction;
* History of postural deformities, diaphragmatic abnormalities, or colostomy bag;
* Unstable fracture (lower or upper limbs in proximal regions or thorax);
* Pleural effusion requiring drainage;
* Presence of drains in the thoracic and/or abdominal regions;
* Unstable intracranial pressure;
* Pregnant patients;
* Immediate postoperative period of orthopedic surgeries;
* Use of mucolytics;
* Open ventriculostomy for drainage;
* Uncontrolled agitation;
* Pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator;
* Pneumothorax;
* Use of neuromuscular blockers;
* Active tuberculosis;
* Traction devices;
* Active bleeding;
* Suspected or confirmed pulmonary embolism without prior treatment within 24 hours;
* Presence of a large mass in the right and/or left hemithorax;
* History of cardiopulmonary arrest within the past 24 hours under neuroprotection;
* In the total weaning phase from IMV and/or tracheostomy and/or enteral feeding tube and/or scheduled CT scan within the next 6 hours;
* Intolerance to the TLA test (SpO₂ drop \<92% or ≥20% from baseline, need for FiO₂ increase \>50% or ≥20% from baseline, need for PEEP increase, or hemodynamic instability within the first 5 minutes of lateralization testing);
* Those who refuse to provide consent, as determined by the legal representative.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pernambuco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shirley Lima Campos

Principal Researcher

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emanuel Fernandes Ferreira da Silva Júnior, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE) - Health-Applied Biology Graduate Program, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil

Shirley Lima Campos Lima Campos, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Geral Otávio de Freitas - Secretaria de Saúde de Pernambuco

Recife, Pernamu, Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Shirley Lima Campos, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+5581999413087

Emanuel Fernandes Ferreira da Silva Júnior, MSc

Role: CONTACT

+ 55 81 99703-9934

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Rômulo de Aquino Coelho Lins Direção do Hospital Geral Otávio de Freitas, MSc

Role: primary

+55 81 9 9486498

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dianti J, Bertoni M, Goligher EC. Monitoring patient-ventilator interaction by an end-expiratory occlusion maneuver. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2338-2341. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06167-3. Epub 2020 Jul 4. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32623476 (View on PubMed)

Salluh JI, Soares M. ICU severity of illness scores: APACHE, SAPS and MPM. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Oct;20(5):557-65. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000135.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25137401 (View on PubMed)

Chen H, Liang M, He Y, Teboul JL, Sun Q, Xie J, Yang Y, Qiu H, Liu L. Inspiratory effort impacts the accuracy of pulse pressure variations for fluid responsiveness prediction in mechanically ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing activity: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Aug 17;13(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01167-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37592166 (View on PubMed)

Silva Junior EFFD, Campos SL, Leite WS, Melo PVS, Lins RAC, Araujo MDGR, Guerino MR. Surface electromyography signal processing and evaluation on respiratory muscles of critically ill patients: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 27;18(4):e0284911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284911. eCollection 2023.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37104255 (View on PubMed)

Costa LSP, Reinaux CMA, Junior EFFS, Leite WS, Brandao DC, de Andrade AD, Roldan R, Morais CCA, Campos SL. Physiology of body lateralization on regional lung ventilation and lung volumes in healthy subjects: Within-subjects design. PLoS One. 2025 Oct 30;20(10):e0335622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335622. eCollection 2025.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 41166369 (View on PubMed)

Zack MB. Pectoriloquy, a retrospective analysis. Chest. 2009 Jan;135(1):8-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2261. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19136401 (View on PubMed)

Vedrenne-Cloquet M, Ito Y, Hotz J, Klein MJ, Herrera M, Chang D, Bhalla AK, Newth CJL, Khemani RG. Phenotypes based on respiratory drive and effort to identify the risk factors when P0.1 fails to estimate ∆PES in ventilated children. Crit Care. 2024 Oct 4;28(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05103-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39367452 (View on PubMed)

Umbrello M, Formenti P, Longhi D, Galimberti A, Piva I, Pezzi A, Mistraletti G, Marini JJ, Iapichino G. Diaphragm ultrasound as indicator of respiratory effort in critically ill patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation: a pilot clinical study. Crit Care. 2015 Apr 13;19(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0894-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25886857 (View on PubMed)

Suttapanit K, Wongkrasunt S, Savatmongkorngul S, Supatanakij P. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the diaphragm in critically ill patients to predict invasive mechanical ventilation. J Intensive Care. 2023 Sep 19;11(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00690-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37726832 (View on PubMed)

Schifino G, Vega ML, Pisani L, Prediletto I, Catalanotti V, Comellini V, Bassi I, Zompatori M, Ranieri MV, Nava S. Effects of non-invasive respiratory supports on inspiratory effort in moderate-severe COVID-19 patients. A randomized physiological study. Eur J Intern Med. 2022 Jun;100:110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.04.012. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35483993 (View on PubMed)

ROSA, Jéssica dos Santos Pereira et al. Impacts in the Respiratory Mechanics of the Ventilator Hyperinsuflation in the Flow Bias Concept: a Narrative Review. Journal of Health Sciences, v. 21, n. 3, p. 250-254, 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Roesthuis LH, van der Hoeven JG, van Hees HWH, Schellekens WM, Doorduin J, Heunks LMA. Recruitment pattern of the diaphragm and extradiaphragmatic inspiratory muscles in response to different levels of pressure support. Ann Intensive Care. 2020 May 29;10(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00684-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32472272 (View on PubMed)

Dos Santos Rocha A, Diaper J, Balogh AL, Marti C, Grosgurin O, Habre W, Petak F, Sudy R. Effect of body position on the redistribution of regional lung aeration during invasive and non-invasive ventilation of COVID-19 patients. Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 30;12(1):11085. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15122-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35773299 (View on PubMed)

Pearce AK, McGuire WC, Elliott AR, Goligher EC, Prisk GK, Butler JP, Malhotra A. Impact of Supine Versus Semirecumbent Body Posture on the Distribution of Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Crit Care Explor. 2023 Dec 1;5(12):e1014. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001014. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38053751 (View on PubMed)

Kubota S, Hashimoto H, Yoshikawa Y, Hiwatashi K, Ono T, Mochizuki M, Naraba H, Nakano H, Takahashi Y, Sonoo T, Nakamura K. Effects of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation on ventilator-free days in intensive care unit subjects with sputum retention; a randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2024 May 2;19(5):e0302239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302239. eCollection 2024.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38696429 (View on PubMed)

Huerta MDR, Giralt JAS, Diez-Fernandez A, Alonso MJR, Montes N, Suarez-Sipmann F. Effects of routine postural repositioning on the distribution of lung ventilation and perfusion in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Apr;87:103952. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103952. Epub 2025 Jan 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39864264 (View on PubMed)

Gong S, Lian H, Ding X, Wang X; Chinese Critical Ultrasound Study Group (CCUSG). High Respiratory and Cardiac Drive Exacerbate Secondary Lung Injury in Patients With Critical Illness. J Intensive Care Med. 2025 Mar;40(3):231-238. doi: 10.1177/08850666231222220. Epub 2024 Jan 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38173252 (View on PubMed)

Franchineau G, Jonkman AH, Piquilloud L, Yoshida T, Costa E, Roze H, Camporota L, Piraino T, Spinelli E, Combes A, Alcala GC, Amato M, Mauri T, Frerichs I, Brochard LJ, Schmidt M. Electrical Impedance Tomography to Monitor Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 15;209(6):670-682. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202306-1118CI.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38127779 (View on PubMed)

Cherniack NS, Lederer DH, Altose MD, Kelsen SG. Occlusion pressure as a technique in evaluating respiratory control. Chest. 1976 Jul;70(1 Suppl):137-41. doi: 10.1378/chest.70.1_supplement.137. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 939129 (View on PubMed)

Caetano DS, Morais CC, Leite WS, Lins RAC, Medeiros KJ, Cornejo RA, de Andrade AD, Campos SL, Brandao DC. Electrical Impedance Tomographic Mapping of Hypoventilated Lung Areas in Intubated Patients With COVID-19. Respir Care. 2023 Jun;68(6):773-776. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10261. Epub 2023 Apr 25. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37185111 (View on PubMed)

Brito ALA, Ferreira ACA, Costa LSP, Silva Junior EFF, Campos SL. Effect of Continuous Lateral Rotation Therapy on Clinical Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Adults. Respir Care. 2024 Nov 18;69(12):1592-1606. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11781.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38744476 (View on PubMed)

Bonczynski GS, Novo JS, Dias AS, Martins LFG, Naue WDS, Volpe MS, Junior LAF. Ventilator hyperinflation associated with flow bias optimization in the bronchial hygiene of mechanically ventilated patients. Heart Lung. 2024 Mar-Apr;64:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2023.10.011. Epub 2023 Nov 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37988854 (View on PubMed)

Bertoni M, Telias I, Urner M, Long M, Del Sorbo L, Fan E, Sinderby C, Beck J, Liu L, Qiu H, Wong J, Slutsky AS, Ferguson ND, Brochard LJ, Goligher EC. A novel non-invasive method to detect excessively high respiratory effort and dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2019 Nov 6;23(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2617-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31694692 (View on PubMed)

American Association for Respiratory Care. AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients with artificial airways 2010. Respir Care. 2010 Jun;55(6):758-64.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20507660 (View on PubMed)

Alcala GC, Ekkapat G, Medeiros KJ, Morais CCA, Xin Y, Giammatteo V, Bruno G, Nova A, Wanderley H, Buhl T, Victor M, Gaulton TG, La Vita CJ, Amato MBP, Ceradda M, Berra L, Ribeiro De Santis Santiago R. Monitoring Lung Function with Electrical Impedance Tomography in the Intensive Care Unit. J Vis Exp. 2024 Sep 6;(211). doi: 10.3791/66756.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39311582 (View on PubMed)

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Study Protocol

The Multicare: Bed for Protocol is used to standardize therapeutic positioning, ensuring precision and safety in evaluating the postural effects on lung aeration and respiratory drive

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

92079725.0.0000.5208

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LATLUNG

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.