Effect of PEEP=5cmH2O vs PEEP=0cmH2O PSV Strategies During SBT on Successful Disconnection From Mechanical Ventilation
NCT ID: NCT04939285
Last Updated: 2021-06-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-10
2021-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A SBT-based Protocol-directed Program in Difficult-to-Wean Patients
NCT05035355
Spontaneous Breathing Trial With T-piece or Inspiratory Pressure Augmentation
NCT04222205
Proportional Assisted Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation in Adult Patients With Prolonged Ventilation
NCT04140682
Ventilation Strategies During Spontaneous Breathing Trial
NCT02939963
Spontaneous Breathing Trials Using Pressure Support or T-Piece in Overweight and Obese Patients
NCT07114289
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PEEP=5cmH2O
In PSV mode,PS = 8 cmH2O,PEEP= 5 cmH2O, and FiO2 level was consistent with that before SBT
PEEP
The patients who met the withdrawal screening criteria were randomly divided into low pressure support level PSV spontaneous respiration test.The duration of the spontaneous breathing test was 30 minutes, and the results of the spontaneous breathing test were evaluated at the end of the test.
PEEP=0cmH2O
In PSV mode,PS = 8 cmH2O,PEEP=0 cmH2O, and FiO2 level was consistent with that before SBT
PEEP
The patients who met the withdrawal screening criteria were randomly divided into low pressure support level PSV spontaneous respiration test.The duration of the spontaneous breathing test was 30 minutes, and the results of the spontaneous breathing test were evaluated at the end of the test.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PEEP
The patients who met the withdrawal screening criteria were randomly divided into low pressure support level PSV spontaneous respiration test.The duration of the spontaneous breathing test was 30 minutes, and the results of the spontaneous breathing test were evaluated at the end of the test.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 2\) Patients with mechanical ventilation for 24h;
* 3\) Meet the screening standards for daily disconnection;
* 4\) The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and China's regulations on clinical trial research, and the patient or his/her family members have informed and agreed to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* 2\) Patients who refuse to be intubated again after endotracheal intubation is removed;
* 3\) Patients on long-term mechanical ventilation: mechanical ventilation duration was continuous for 21 days, \>6 h/d;
* 4\) The attending physician decides the withdrawal plan (e.g., the potential pathology is more favorable to the specific withdrawal plan).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Liu ZiMeng
associate professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ZiMeng Liu, Doctor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The first affiliated hospital of SunYatSen University
Guanzhou, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Liu Zimeng, doctor
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Esteban A, Frutos F, Tobin MJ, Alia I, Solsona JF, Valverdu I, Fernandez R, de la Cal MA, Benito S, Tomas R, et al. A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med. 1995 Feb 9;332(6):345-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199502093320601.
Ely EW, Baker AM, Dunagan DP, Burke HL, Smith AC, Kelly PT, Johnson MM, Browder RW, Bowton DL, Haponik EF. Effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation of identifying patients capable of breathing spontaneously. N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 19;335(25):1864-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199612193352502.
Esteban A, Alia I, Gordo F, Fernandez R, Solsona JF, Vallverdu I, Macias S, Allegue JM, Blanco J, Carriedo D, Leon M, de la Cal MA, Taboada F, Gonzalez de Velasco J, Palazon E, Carrizosa F, Tomas R, Suarez J, Goldwasser RS. Extubation outcome after spontaneous breathing trials with T-tube or pressure support ventilation. The Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;156(2 Pt 1):459-65. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.2.9610109.
Esteban A, Alia I, Tobin MJ, Gil A, Gordo F, Vallverdu I, Blanch L, Bonet A, Vazquez A, de Pablo R, Torres A, de La Cal MA, Macias S. Effect of spontaneous breathing trial duration on outcome of attempts to discontinue mechanical ventilation. Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Feb;159(2):512-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.2.9803106.
Perren A, Domenighetti G, Mauri S, Genini F, Vizzardi N. Protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation: clinical outcome in patients randomized for a 30-min or 120-min trial with pressure support ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2002 Aug;28(8):1058-63. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1353-z. Epub 2002 Jul 13.
Sklar MC, Burns K, Rittayamai N, Lanys A, Rauseo M, Chen L, Dres M, Chen GQ, Goligher EC, Adhikari NKJ, Brochard L, Friedrich JO. Effort to Breathe with Various Spontaneous Breathing Trial Techniques. A Physiologic Meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun 1;195(11):1477-1485. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201607-1338OC.
Pellegrini JA, Moraes RB, Maccari JG, de Oliveira RP, Savi A, Ribeiro RA, Burns KE, Teixeira C. Spontaneous Breathing Trials With T-Piece or Pressure Support Ventilation. Respir Care. 2016 Dec;61(12):1693-1703. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04816. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
Burns KEA, Soliman I, Adhikari NKJ, Zwein A, Wong JTY, Gomez-Builes C, Pellegrini JA, Chen L, Rittayamai N, Sklar M, Brochard LJ, Friedrich JO. Trials directly comparing alternative spontaneous breathing trial techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017 Jun 1;21(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1698-x.
Li Y, Li H, Zhang D. Comparison of T-piece and pressure support ventilation as spontaneous breathing trials in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2020 Feb 26;24(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2764-3.
Subira C, Hernandez G, Vazquez A, Rodriguez-Garcia R, Gonzalez-Castro A, Garcia C, Rubio O, Ventura L, Lopez A, de la Torre MC, Keough E, Arauzo V, Hermosa C, Sanchez C, Tizon A, Tenza E, Laborda C, Cabanes S, Lacueva V, Del Mar Fernandez M, Arnau A, Fernandez R. Effect of Pressure Support vs T-Piece Ventilation Strategies During Spontaneous Breathing Trials on Successful Extubation Among Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2175-2182. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7234.
Schmidt GA, Girard TD, Kress JP, Morris PE, Ouellette DR, Alhazzani W, Burns SM, Epstein SK, Esteban A, Fan E, Ferrer M, Fraser GL, Gong MN, Hough CL, Mehta S, Nanchal R, Patel S, Pawlik AJ, Schweickert WD, Sessler CN, Strom T, Wilson KC, Truwit JD. Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults: Executive Summary of an Official American College of Chest Physicians/American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Chest. 2017 Jan;151(1):160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.037. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
El-Khatib MF, Zeineldine SM, Jamaleddine GW. Effect of pressure support ventilation and positive end expiratory pressure on the rapid shallow breathing index in intensive care unit patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Mar;34(3):505-10. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0939-x. Epub 2007 Dec 1.
Futier E, Constantin JM, Petit A, Jung B, Kwiatkowski F, Duclos M, Jaber S, Bazin JE. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves end-expiratory lung volume but not oxygenation after induction of anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;27(6):508-13. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283398806.
Ostberg E, Thorisson A, Enlund M, Zetterstrom H, Hedenstierna G, Edmark L. Positive End-expiratory Pressure Alone Minimizes Atelectasis Formation in Nonabdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2018 Jun;128(6):1117-1124. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002134.
Young CC, Harris EM, Vacchiano C, Bodnar S, Bukowy B, Elliott RRD, Migliarese J, Ragains C, Trethewey B, Woodward A, Gama de Abreu M, Girard M, Futier E, Mulier JP, Pelosi P, Sprung J. Lung-protective ventilation for the surgical patient: international expert panel-based consensus recommendations. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Dec;123(6):898-913. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.017. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
Cabello B, Thille AW, Roche-Campo F, Brochard L, Gomez FJ, Mancebo J. Physiological comparison of three spontaneous breathing trials in difficult-to-wean patients. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jul;36(7):1171-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1870-0. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020761001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.