Inspiratory Work of Breathing Before and After Extubation

NCT ID: NCT07017608

Last Updated: 2025-06-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

67 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Critically ill patients who (1) are not able to maintain their airway, (2) cannot breathe on their own, or (3) both, are ones who often require tracheal intubation and support from a breathing machine (mechanical ventilator). When the patient is ready to be liberated from the mechanical ventilator because the initial insult for intubation has been resolved, the patient is screened using the readiness to wean test in preparation for extubation. As the patient passes this screening, a spontaneous breathing test (SBT) is initiated. Currently, there are many debates surrounding which SBT technique is most favorable. At Toronto General Hospital, the clinical team uses a zero-end expiratory pressure (ZEEP) trial. Once the patient successfully passes their SBT they are then extubated.

The patient will undergo a spontaneous breathing trial of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of 5 cmH2O and ZEEP, in which time the investigators will be using a new technology called electrical impedance tomography (EIT), to study and compare the end expiratory lung volume (EELV); investigators will use an esophageal catheter to measure and monitor pressures in the lung, and also assess the patient's work of breathing. This will be repeated once the patient has been extubated safely.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Detailed Description:

Many patients in intensive critical care require mechanical ventilation. Once the underlying reasons for intubating critically ill patients have been addressed, healthcare providers aim to allow patients to return to breathing spontaneously and to safely remove the endotracheal tube (ETT) at the earliest appropriate time. Unnecessarily delaying the removal of the ETT (extubation) may cause diaphragm muscle weakening or introduce ventilator induced pneumonia (VAP), ventilator induced lung injury (VILI) and ventilator induced diaphragm dysfunction. Thus, it is important to determine when a patient is ready to be weaned from mechanical ventilation in a timely manner.

Spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) can be used to aid in assessing a patient's readiness for extubation. There is currently no clear consensus on which technique is the most beneficial as there are uncertainties about how different SBT strategies impact both gas exchange and the work of breathing (WOB) before and after extubation. At Toronto General Hospital (TGH), patients are placed on a zero positive end expiratory pressure (ZEEP) SBT trial. It has been argued that the resistance from ETT increases WOB while a patient is on ZEEP, and this added effort may be eased through the use of low levels of pressure support or CPAP, which could potentially improve the success of extubation processes. Additionally, maintaining some amount of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) during SBT might improve oxygenation and WOB.

This study aims to understand how the zero positive end expiratory pressure (ZEEP) trial affects lung function and breathing effort in lung transplant patients who require mechanical ventilation in the ICU. The use of tools such as Esophageal and gastric balloon (NutriVent, Sidam, Mirandola, Italy), EIT (Drager PulmoVista 500), Pneumotachograph, FluxMed respiratory monitor, and Respiratory muscle ultrasound will be used to measure lung function, respiratory mechanics, muscle function, arterial blood gas, gastric pressure and esophageal pressure.

After enrolling 27 participants, this study has been amended to address an additional new objective - the validation of non-invasive occlusion maneuvers to estimate expiratory muscle pressure. Expiratory activity is a phenomenon that can provide important insights during mechanical ventilation and during an SBT trial. EELV might decrease due to expiratory muscle activity, possibly impairing gas exchange and increasing lung elastance due to collapse. Currently, the use of a gastric balloon is the gold standard method to assess expiratory effort and enable quantification of expiratory muscle pressure by expiratory variation of gastric pressure (∆Pga). However, the gastric balloon is an invasive tool that presents several downsides, as a high cost and the need for expertise in balloon calibration and waveform analysis. This highlights the need for non-invasive methods to detect and quantify expiratory muscle activity. The ability of occlusion maneuvers to detect presence of expiratory muscle effort measured with the gold standard (gastric pressure) will be assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves. A total of 40 patients will be enrolled to address this objective, in addition to the 27 patients already enrolled, for a total of 67 patients. Of the first 27 patients enrolled, only 15 underwent study procedures. Going forward, a patient will be considered enrolled if they undergo study procedures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Transplant; Complications Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients intubated and ventilated

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindication for esophageal catheter insertion: upper gastrointestinal surgery within prior 6 weeks, actively bleeding esophageal varices
* Bronchopleural fistula
* Contraindication for electrical impedance tomography: chest burns, skin lesions in the thorax, chest wall bandaging limiting electrode placement, unstable spinal lesions or fractures
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ewan Goligher

Ewan C Goligher, MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ewan Goligher, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Health Network, Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Glauco Plens, MD

Role: CONTACT

416-340-4800 ext. 7613

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ewan Goligher, MD

Role: primary

416-340-4800 ext. 6810

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19-5879

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.