Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in Adults at Risk of Delayed Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation

NCT ID: NCT01826890

Last Updated: 2019-03-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

78 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2018-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Many patients admitted to intensive care have heart or lung problems. Patients with these conditions often require longer durations of support from breathing machines. Survival and long-term recovery are improved if the investigators can remove the breathing support quickly. In this study, the investigators will focus on patients with severe lung or heart disease to examine whether a particular type of breathing machine (NAVA ventilator) will allow us to remove breathing support more quickly and with less need for sedative medications, when compared to current practice.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this study, we will compare the use of Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist technology (the NAVA ventilation mode and the monitoring capabilities) against standard care in patients who are at risk of prolonged periods of mechanical ventilation.

Study aim

To inform the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) by undertaking feasibility testing, evaluation of the proposed NAVA intervention and evaluation of the proposed outcomes.

Feasibility outcomes

* Number of eligible patients
* Assessment of screening and recruitment methods
* The willingness of clinicians to allow recruitment
* The willingness of participants to be randomised
* Assessment of the randomisation process
* Staff attitudes and training needs
* Protocol compliance (barriers to the use of NAVA ventilation)

Intended primary outcomes of the main study

\*Ventilator-free days (day 28)

There are a number of secondary outcomes that include:

* Total sedation / hypnotic / analgesic dose
* Ventilator free days (day 90)
* Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV)
* Duration of MV (including Non-invasive ventilation (NIV))
* Duration of post extubation NIV
* Incidence of delirium (CAM-ICU)
* Change in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score from baseline to day 3, 7, 14 and 28
* ICU and hospital length of stay
* Day 28, ICU discharge, hospital discharge and 90 day post randomisation survival
* Agitation / comfort (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Score (RASS) plus Visual \*Analogue Scale where possible)
* Frequency of sedation / analgesic / hypnotic bolus doses
* Ventilator associated pneumonia (developed 48 hours after study entry)
* Unplanned device removal (eg. ET tubes, catheters etc.)
* Patient-ventilator asynchrony
* Duration in each ventilation mode
* Change in the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi)
* Health Resource Group costs
* Quality of life at 90 days - SF36 questionnaire

STUDY DESIGN

A pilot feasibility, single centre, open label randomised controlled study. In summary, group one will receive standard care and group two will receive standard care with the addition of NAVA technology.

POPULATION

Intubated, critically ill or high-risk elective peri-operative adult patients who are at greatest risk of difficult or prolonged weaning: those with pre-existing cardiopulmonary dysfunction.

Inclusions

ICU admissions who are likely to remain intubated and ventilated for greater than 48 hours with a diagnosis of one or a combination of:

1. COPD
2. Left and/or right ventricular heart failure
3. Mild, moderate or severe (Berlin criteria) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

All diagnoses must be documented in the medical notes. There must be evidence of a specialist consultant diagnosis, or a non-specialist doctor diagnosis with either objective test results (spirometry, CT, lung biopsy, cardiac echo) and/or prescribed treatment.

Exclusions

* Less than 18 years old or pregnant.
* Inability to conduct protocol (e.g. research staff or NAVA technology unavailable).
* No personal or nominated consultee available or assent declined.
* Greater than 96 hours from intubation.
* Greater than 24 hours in the weaning phase.
* Patient likely to die/have treatment withdrawal within 48 hours.
* Contraindication to passing NG tube.
* Patients with primary neurological cause of ventilator dependence.
* High spinal injury above C6; severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Score \< 8).
* Suspected or proven hypoxic brain injury.
* Physician refusal / physician wishes to use NAVA.
* Hepatic encephalopathy greater than grade one.
* Domiciliary ventilation (except Continuous Positive Pressure (CPAP)or Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) used for sleep disordered breathing).
* Enrollment in another interventional clinical trial in the last 30 days.
* Non-English speakers where inadequate translation available to allow informed consent.

STUDY SITE

Three adult ICUs at KCH NHS Foundation Trust, London.

SAMPLE SIZE

76 patients will be recruited to estimate an anticipated compliance of 75% (95% confidence interval of +/- 10%).

FOLLOW-UP SF-36 will occur at 90 days post ICU discharge.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adults With Cardiopulmonary Disease at Risk of Prolonged Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NAVA technology

Following randomisation, a NAVA catheter will be introduced. The Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm (EAdi) will be viewed primarily to ensure a minimum level of diaphragm activation during the weaning phase. NAVA mode suitability/safety assessments will be conducted in all patients prior to the first initiation of the NAVA mode. The NAVA preview function on the Maquet Servo-i ventilators will be used to transfer from the previous mode to the NAVA mode, and the assessment will last for a maximum of 30 minutes. We are recommending the use of the NAVA ventilation mode during the weaning period. Following the commencement of weaning, sedation holds and spontaneous breathing trials will be conducted according to local protocols.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NAVA Technology

Intervention Type OTHER

Use of NAVA technology: Diaphragmatic monitoring and NAVA ventilation mode

Standard Care

A NAVA catheter will be inserted following randomisation. The NAVA capabilities of the ventilator will be disabled. Patients will be ventilated according to local weaning protocol as per current standard care with either Pressure Support, Synchronised Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation, Volume Controlled Ventilation, Pressure Controlled Ventilation or Pressure Regulated Volume Controlled Ventilation. Following the commencement of weaning, sedation holds and spontaneous breathing trials will be conducted according to local protocols.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NAVA Technology

Use of NAVA technology: Diaphragmatic monitoring and NAVA ventilation mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist NAVA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

ICU admissions who are likely to remain intubated and ventilated for greater than 48 hours with a diagnosis of one or a combination of:

1. COPD
2. Left and/or right ventricular heart failure
3. Mild, moderate or severe (Berlin criteria) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

All diagnoses must be documented in the medical notes. There must be evidence of a specialist consultant diagnosis, or a non-specialist doctor diagnosis with either objective test results (spirometry, CT, lung biopsy, cardiac echo) and/or prescribed treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Less than 18 years old or pregnant
* Inability to conduct protocol (e.g. research staff or NAVA technology unavailable)
* No personal or nominated consultee available or assent declined
* Greater than 96 hours from intubation
* Greater than 24 hours in the weaning phase
* Patient likely to die/have treatment withdrawal within 48 hours
* Contraindication to passing NG tube
* Patients with primary neurological cause of ventilator dependence
* High spinal injury above C6; severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Score \< 8)
* Suspected or proven hypoxic brain injury
* Physician refusal / physician wishes to use NAVA
* Hepatic encephalopathy greater than grade one
* Domiciliary ventilation (except CPAP/BIPAP used for sleep disordered breathing)
* Enrollment in another interventional clinical trial in the last 30 days
* Non-English speakers where inadequate translation available to allow informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

King's College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

JP Moulton Charitable Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

King's College Hospital NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daniel J Hadfield

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

King's College Hospital NHS Trust

Phillip A Hopkins

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

King's College Hopspital NHS Foundation Trust

Nicholas Hart

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Gerrard F Rafferty

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

King's College Hospital NHS Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hadfield DJ, Rose L, Reid F, Cornelius V, Hart N, Finney C, Penhaligon B, Molai J, Harris C, Saha S, Noble H, Clarey E, Thompson L, Smith J, Johnson L, Hopkins PA, Rafferty GF. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus pressure support ventilation: a randomized controlled feasibility trial performed in patients at risk of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2020 May 14;24(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02923-5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32408883 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13/LO/0012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.