Extubation Advisor: Initial Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Extubation Clinical Decision Support Tool

NCT ID: NCT04708509

Last Updated: 2025-05-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-04

Study Completion Date

2023-01-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Expeditious, safe extubation is vitally important in the care of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, as prolonged mechanical ventilation harms patients and failed extubation (i.e. re-intubation within 48 hrs) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and costs. The urgent need to improve extubation failure is further highlighted by current observations suggesting that COVID-19 patients are at increased risk of both early and late extubation failure. The investigators previously found that decreased respiratory rate variability (indicative of reduced adaptability and/or increased stress) during Spontaneous Breathing Trials (SBTs) predicted extubation failure and outperformed the best available predictive indices. Combining this predictive analytic with standardized extubation readiness checklists and risk mitigation strategies, the investigators created the Extubation Advisor (EA). The investigators recently completed a single-center phase I mixed methods observational study (n=117) wherein there was demonstrated technical feasibility (i.e. ability to generate 92% EA of reports) and clinician acceptance of the EA tool. In the current open-label, multi-center interventional phase I study, the investigators will assess the feasibility and initial perceptions of EA implementation in the intensive care unit by (1) evaluating the feasibility of patient enrolment, data collection, and EA report generation, and (2) performing a mixed-methods analysis of critical care physician and respiratory therapist perceptions of EA. Findings from this study will inform a future randomized controlled trial assessing EA outcomes compared to standard of care, with the intent of aiding bedside decision-making, enhancing care delivery, and improving outcomes in critically ill patients with and without COVID-19.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Airway Extubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Open-label, multi-center interventional Phase 1 study to implement and evaluate perceptions of Extubation Advisor in consenting patients in the intensive care unit.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Arm

Wave form data from participants' spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) will be analyzed using Extubation Advisor (EA) to generate an EA report that provides clinical decision support regarding extubation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Extubation Advisor

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants undergoing a Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) to assess readiness for extubation will be connected to a portable monitor displaying ECG, capnography, and other waveforms. This monitor will also be connected to a laptop containing the Extubation Advisor (EA) software. During the SBT, relevant patient information will be entered into the EA application and the EA application will record waveform data. When the SBT is complete, the EA application will analyze the waveform and patient data to generate a score summarizing the risk of extubation failure. A report will be generated and provided to the respiratory therapist and attending physician to help determine whether to proceed with extubation or not. Patients will be followed for 72 hours after extubation, when the clinical outcome case report form will be completed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Extubation Advisor

Participants undergoing a Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) to assess readiness for extubation will be connected to a portable monitor displaying ECG, capnography, and other waveforms. This monitor will also be connected to a laptop containing the Extubation Advisor (EA) software. During the SBT, relevant patient information will be entered into the EA application and the EA application will record waveform data. When the SBT is complete, the EA application will analyze the waveform and patient data to generate a score summarizing the risk of extubation failure. A report will be generated and provided to the respiratory therapist and attending physician to help determine whether to proceed with extubation or not. Patients will be followed for 72 hours after extubation, when the clinical outcome case report form will be completed.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* In the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
* Able to provide informed consent (through a surrogate)
* Invasive mechanical ventilation for \> 48 hours
* Ready for spontaneous breathing test (SBT) for assessment for extubation
* At least partial reversal of the condition precipitating mechanical ventilation
* Stabilization of other organ systems
* Toleration of pressure support ventilation less than or equal to 14 cm H2O, (oxygen saturation (SpO2) greater than or equal to 90% with fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) less than or equal to 40% and positive end-expiry pressure (PEEP) less than or equal to 10cm H2O)
* Hemodynamic stability (low - phenylephrine less than 50 ug/min; norepinephrine less than 5 ug/min; dobutamine less than 5 ug/kg/min; milrinone less than 0.4 ug/kg/min - or no vasopressors)
* Stable neurological status (no deterioration in Glasgow coma score during prior 24 hours and, if measured, intracranial pressure (ICP) less than 20 mmHg)
* Intact airway reflexes (adequate cough with suctioning and a gag reflex)
* Normal sinus rhythm at the time of the SBT (no pacemaker)

Exclusion Criteria

* Order not to re-intubate should the patient fail extubation
* Anticipated withdrawal of life support
* Known or suspected severe weakness (myopathy, neuropathy, or quadriplegia)
* Tracheostomy
* Prior extubation during current ICU stay
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrew JE Seely, MD, PhD, FRCSC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Ottawa Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hryciw BN, Hudek N, Brehaut JC, Herry C, Scales N, Lee E, Sarti AJ, Burns KEA, Seely AJE. Extubation Advisor: Implementation and Evaluation of A Novel Extubation Clinical Decision Support Tool. J Intensive Care Med. 2025 Apr;40(4):418-426. doi: 10.1177/08850666241291524. Epub 2024 Oct 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39444331 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2681

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Apparatus and Method for Moving Patients
NCT04882865 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING