Post-extubation High-flow Nasal Oxygen for Preventing Extubation Failure
NCT ID: NCT03361683
Last Updated: 2019-08-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
127 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-10-01
2019-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Given the beneficial effects described above, the investigators hypothesize that high-flow nasal oxygen therapy decreases the risk of extubation failure in a group of patients that required invasive mechanical ventilation due to primary acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of HFNC Versus NIV for Prevent Reintubation in Sepsis Patients
NCT03246893
High-flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Extubation Failure in Adult Trauma Intensive Care Patients
NCT06110390
Extubation Failure Prevention in High Risk Patients by High-flow Conditioned Oxygen Therapy vs. Standard Oxygen Therapy
NCT01820507
Nasal High-flow Versus Venturi Mask Oxygen Therapy in the Post-extubation Period
NCT01575353
Non-invasive Ventilation vs Oxygen Therapy After Extubation Failure
NCT03832387
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Extubation failure shall be defined as the need for using invasive mechanical ventilation again within two days following extubation based on the criteria below:
* Breathing rate over 25 breaths per minute for more than two hours.
* Heart rate above 140 beats per minute or with a sustained increase or decrease greater than 20%.
* Clinical data showing fatigue of the respiratory muscles or an increase in breathing work.
* SaO2 \<90%; PaO2 \<80 mmHg with a FiO2 \> 50%.
* Hypercapnia (PaCO2 \>45 mmHg or \>20% compared to the value before extubation) with a pH below 7.33.
Patients who do not fulfill the extubation failure criteria after the first 48 hours of admission may receive extra supplementary oxygen through any device (e.g., nasal cannula, face mask, reservoir mask, etc.). Every day, SpO2 will be measured and the moment when the patient reaches SpO2 \>94% with no need for oxygen will be determined.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High-flow nasal oxygen
Randomized patients will receive oxygen through a high flow nasal device capable of delivering humidified, heated air at an output rate of 40 L/min
High-flow nasal oxygen
Randomized patients will receive oxygen through a high nasal flow device capable of delivering humidified, heated air at an output rate of 40 L/min
Conventional oxygen
Randomized patients will receive oxygen through a Venturi mask at an air flow of 15 L/min
Venturi mask
Randomized patients will receive oxygen through a Venturi mask at an air flow of 15 L/min
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High-flow nasal oxygen
Randomized patients will receive oxygen through a high nasal flow device capable of delivering humidified, heated air at an output rate of 40 L/min
Venturi mask
Randomized patients will receive oxygen through a Venturi mask at an air flow of 15 L/min
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours
Successful Spontaneous Breathing Trial
Exclusion Criteria
Immediate indication for non-invasive mechanical ventilation
Self-extubation
One or more failed Spontaneous Breathing Trial
Chronic respiratory failure
Neuromuscular diseases
Tracheostomy.
Nasal cavity pathology
Facial surgery
Failure to authorize the informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jose de Jesus Rodriguez-Andoney, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán,
México, , Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chanques G, Constantin JM, Sauter M, Jung B, Sebbane M, Verzilli D, Lefrant JY, Jaber S. Discomfort associated with underhumidified high-flow oxygen therapy in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jun;35(6):996-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1456-x. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
Dysart K, Miller TL, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH. Research in high flow therapy: mechanisms of action. Respir Med. 2009 Oct;103(10):1400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 May 21.
Dewan NA, Bell CW. Effect of low flow and high flow oxygen delivery on exercise tolerance and sensation of dyspnea. A study comparing the transtracheal catheter and nasal prongs. Chest. 1994 Apr;105(4):1061-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.4.1061.
Ricard JD. High flow nasal oxygen in acute respiratory failure. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Jul;78(7):836-41. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
Groves N, Tobin A. High flow nasal oxygen generates positive airway pressure in adult volunteers. Aust Crit Care. 2007 Nov;20(4):126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2007.08.001. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
Corley A, Caruana LR, Barnett AG, Tronstad O, Fraser JF. Oxygen delivery through high-flow nasal cannulae increase end-expiratory lung volume and reduce respiratory rate in post-cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Dec;107(6):998-1004. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer265. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
Spence KL, Murphy D, Kilian C, McGonigle R, Kilani RA. High-flow nasal cannula as a device to provide continuous positive airway pressure in infants. J Perinatol. 2007 Dec;27(12):772-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211828. Epub 2007 Aug 30.
Chidekel A, Zhu Y, Wang J, Mosko JJ, Rodriguez E, Shaffer TH. The effects of gas humidification with high-flow nasal cannula on cultured human airway epithelial cells. Pulm Med. 2012;2012:380686. doi: 10.1155/2012/380686. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson-Mason A, Osiovich H. High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics. 2001 May;107(5):1081-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.5.1081.
Roca O, Riera J, Torres F, Masclans JR. High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Respir Care. 2010 Apr;55(4):408-13.
Maggiore SM, Idone FA, Vaschetto R, Festa R, Cataldo A, Antonicelli F, Montini L, De Gaetano A, Navalesi P, Antonelli M. Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Effects on oxygenation, comfort, and clinical outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 1;190(3):282-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201402-0364OC.
Lenglet H, Sztrymf B, Leroy C, Brun P, Dreyfuss D, Ricard JD. Humidified high flow nasal oxygen during respiratory failure in the emergency department: feasibility and efficacy. Respir Care. 2012 Nov;57(11):1873-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01575. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Gonzalez P, Subira C, Frutos-Vivar F, Rialp G, Laborda C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1354-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2711.
Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Gonzalez P, Canabal A, Sanchez S, Rodriguez ML, Villasclaras A, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Postextubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1565-1574. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14194.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REF-1350
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.