Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
180 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-10
2018-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pilot Study of High-flow Humidified Nasal Oxygen During Breaks From Noninvasive Ventilation
NCT01925534
Prehospital High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy
NCT03326830
Physiologic Effects of High Flow Nasal Therapy in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (OPTIFLOW)
NCT01056952
High VS Low Flow Nasal O2 for Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
NCT04640948
Clinical Effect of the Association of Noninvasive Ventilation and High Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in Resuscitation of Patients With Acute Lung Injury (FLORALI Study)
NCT01320384
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The patients recruited will be stratified into 3 groups according to their oxygen (O2) requirements at recruitment (low, medium and high).
All recruited patients will then be given supplementary O2 using the Optiflow system. Patients from all three recruitment oxygen requirements (low, medium and high) will be randomised to 30 litres, 45 litres or 60 litres per minute with initial a fractional inspired O2 concentration(FiO2) of 0.90 (90% oxygen). The FiO2 is then decreased in 0.05 increments every 5 minutes and the minimum oxygen saturation recorded until it reaches 94%.
End points:
Minimal FiO2 required to maintain saturation above 94% for patients with low, medium and high recruitment oxygen requirements for 30 litres, 45 litres and 60 litres per minute. Use Kruskal Wallis to compare the median FiO2 requirements of those patients who recruited with low, medium and high O2 requirement.
Obtain dose response curve 02 saturation against FiO2 for 3 different flow rates for each of the recruitment 02 requirements and use regression modelling to find best fit dose FiO2 response O2 saturation curves
Patient satisfaction scores and number of patients unable to tolerate the three flow rates in each of the three starting groups and flow rates.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
All recruited patients will then be given supplementary O2 using the Optiflow system. Patients from all three recruitment oxygen requirements (low, medium and high) will be randomised to 30 litres, 45 litres or 60 litres per minute with initial a fractional inspired O2 concentration(FiO2) of 0.90 (90% oxygen). The FiO2 is then decreased in 0.05 increments every 5 minutes and the minimum oxygen saturation recorded until it reaches 94%.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
30 litres per minute
High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'
'Optiflow'
High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'
45 litres per minute
High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'
'Optiflow'
High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'
60 litres per minute
High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'
'Optiflow'
High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
'Optiflow'
High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Nasal obstruction
* Previous bleomycin administration
* Base of skull fracture
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fisher and Paykel Healthcare
INDUSTRY
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Malcolm Sim, MD, MB ChB
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sim MA, Dean P, Kinsella J, Black R, Carter R, Hughes M. Performance of oxygen delivery devices when the breathing pattern of respiratory failure is simulated. Anaesthesia. 2008 Sep;63(9):938-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05536.x. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GN16RM134
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.