Flow veRsus OxygeNaTion In acutE ReSpiratory Failure

NCT ID: NCT03223948

Last Updated: 2017-07-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-10

Study Completion Date

2018-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

High flow nasal oxygen therapy has been widely used but guidelines as to the optimal starting flow rate and oxygen percentage are not available. Prolonged exposure to an inappropriately high oxygen concentration should be avoided as there is increasing evidence that the production of oxygen free radicals can lead to lung damage. This pilot dose finding study will determine the optimal flow rate and oxygen concentration using HFNO2 for patients with respiratory failure requiring low, medium or high oxygen concentration from conventional low flow devices. An assessment will also be made of comfort and compliance with HFNO2.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will recruit a total of between 180 and 270 patients across three hospital sites mainly from high dependence units.

The patients recruited will be stratified into 3 groups according to their oxygen (O2) requirements at recruitment (low, medium and high).

All recruited patients will then be given supplementary O2 using the Optiflow system. Patients from all three recruitment oxygen requirements (low, medium and high) will be randomised to 30 litres, 45 litres or 60 litres per minute with initial a fractional inspired O2 concentration(FiO2) of 0.90 (90% oxygen). The FiO2 is then decreased in 0.05 increments every 5 minutes and the minimum oxygen saturation recorded until it reaches 94%.

End points:

Minimal FiO2 required to maintain saturation above 94% for patients with low, medium and high recruitment oxygen requirements for 30 litres, 45 litres and 60 litres per minute. Use Kruskal Wallis to compare the median FiO2 requirements of those patients who recruited with low, medium and high O2 requirement.

Obtain dose response curve 02 saturation against FiO2 for 3 different flow rates for each of the recruitment 02 requirements and use regression modelling to find best fit dose FiO2 response O2 saturation curves

Patient satisfaction scores and number of patients unable to tolerate the three flow rates in each of the three starting groups and flow rates.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The patients recruited will be divided into 3 groups according to their oxygen (O2) requirements at recruitment (low, medium and high).

All recruited patients will then be given supplementary O2 using the Optiflow system. Patients from all three recruitment oxygen requirements (low, medium and high) will be randomised to 30 litres, 45 litres or 60 litres per minute with initial a fractional inspired O2 concentration(FiO2) of 0.90 (90% oxygen). The FiO2 is then decreased in 0.05 increments every 5 minutes and the minimum oxygen saturation recorded until it reaches 94%.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

30 litres per minute

High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

'Optiflow'

Intervention Type DEVICE

High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'

45 litres per minute

High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

'Optiflow'

Intervention Type DEVICE

High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'

60 litres per minute

High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

'Optiflow'

Intervention Type DEVICE

High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

'Optiflow'

High flow nasal oxygen delivery device 'Optiflow'

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patient aged 18-80 at time of recruitment to study) Able to give their own consent (4 "A" Test score of 0 if capacity questionable) Acute respiratory failure but no significant deterioration in the previous hour Receiving conventional oxygen therapy (Hudson, Venturi, non-rebreathing mask or equivalent) up to a maximum of 90% Oxygen saturation ≥ 94% and respiratory rate ≤30

Exclusion Criteria

Type II respiratory failure (chloride ≤95 and bicarbonate ≥35, on an arterial blood gas or venous sample within 4 weeks) Chronic respiratory disease limiting functional capacity (MRC breathlessness grade IV or V) Pregnancy Heart failure (NYHA Grade III or IV) Decreased GCS Cardiovascular instability (systolic BP ≤90 or heart rate ≥130) Pulmonary embolism Unable to give informed consent Contraindication to receiving high flow nasal oxygen

* Nasal obstruction
* Previous bleomycin administration
* Base of skull fracture
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fisher and Paykel Healthcare

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Malcolm Sim, MD, MB ChB

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Queen Elizabeth University Hospital

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Malcolm J watson, PhD, MB ChB

Role: CONTACT

0141 452 3430

Malcolm Sim, MD, MB ChB

Role: CONTACT

0141 452 3033

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Malcolm Sim, MB ChB

Role: primary

01414523430

Malcolm j watson, MBchB

Role: backup

01414523430

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sim MA, Dean P, Kinsella J, Black R, Carter R, Hughes M. Performance of oxygen delivery devices when the breathing pattern of respiratory failure is simulated. Anaesthesia. 2008 Sep;63(9):938-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05536.x. Epub 2008 Jun 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18540928 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GN16RM134

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.