Identifying the Best Flow Setting Strategy for High-Flow Nasal Cannula

NCT ID: NCT07007715

Last Updated: 2025-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

480 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-05

Study Completion Date

2028-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this randomized trial is to compare four different flow-setting approaches for post-extubation use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). Selecting the appropriate flow rate when initiating HFNC oxygen therapy is both crucial and challenging for clinicians, as the physiological benefits of HFNC depend significantly on the flow rate. To date, there are no guidelines or consensus on flow-rate setting and weaning for HFNC oxygen therapy.

The investigators hypothesized that physiological marker-guided flow setting using peak tidal inspiratory flow (PTIF) or PaO₂/FiO₂ ratios lead to better extubation outcomes as compared to empirical flow setting of 40 L/min or 60 L/min.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four study groups with different flow setting strategies summarized as follows: (1) Setting flow at 40 L/min, (2) Setting flow at 5 L/min above the peak tidal inspiratory flow, up to a maximum of 60 L/min. (3) Setting flow according to P/F ratio prior to extubation. Flow will be set at 60, 50 40 L/min if P/F ratio \<250 mmHg, 250-300 mmHg and \>300 mmHg, respectively. (4) Setting flow at 60 L/min.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a promising intervention for post-extubation oxygen therapy, with the potential to improve oxygenation, increase end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), reduce the work of breathing, and lower the risk of reintubation. Selecting an appropriate flow rate when initiating HFNC therapy is both crucial and challenging for clinicians. Although the physiological benefits of HFNC depend significantly on the flow rate, arbitrarily applying higher flow rates without appropriate patient selection may increase the risk of barotrauma and patient discomfort. Currently, there are no established guidelines or consensus on flow-rate setting for HFNC therapy. Given the growing use of HFNC, determining the optimal flow-setting strategy is urgently needed to ensure both clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

This 4-arm parallel-group randomized trial aims to compare four different flow-setting approaches for post-extubation use of HFNC in extubation outcomes. The individual flow-setting strategy for each study arm is summarized as follows: (1) Setting flow at 40 L/min, (2) Setting flow at 5 L/min above the peak tidal inspiratory flow, up to a maximum of 60 L/min. (3) Setting flow according to P/F ratio prior to extubation. Flow will be set at 60, 50 40 L/min if P/F ratio \<250 mmHg, 250-300 mmHg and \>300 mmHg, respectively. (4) Setting flow at 60 L/min. In addition, this study will incorporate measurements of peak tidal inspiratory flow and EELV to highlight the physiological characteristics of individual patients. These physiological measures may serve as both explanatory variables and potential predictors of flow responders. By examining the associations among flow responders, peak tidal inspiratory flow, pre-extubation oxygen demand, and changes in EELV, we aim to develop a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms and key factors influencing flow responsiveness during post-extubation care with HFNC.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Extubation Readiness Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Flow of 40L/min

Setting HFNC flow at 40 L/min

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Flow of 40L/min

Intervention Type OTHER

Setting flow rate at 40L/min

Peak tidal inspiratory flow (PTIF) guided

Setting HFNC flow at 5 L/min above the peak tidal inspiratory flow (PTIF), up to a maximum of 60 L/min.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Peak tidal inspiratory flow (PTIF) guided

Intervention Type OTHER

Setting HFNC flow at 5 L/min above the peak tidal inspiratory flow (PTIF), up to a maximum of 60 L/min.

PaO2/FiO2 ratio guided

Setting HFNC flow according to P/F ratio prior to extubation. Flow will be set at 60, 50 40 L/min if P/F ratio \<250 mmHg, 250-300 mmHg and \>300 mmHg, respectively.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PaO2/FiO2 ratio guided

Intervention Type OTHER

Setting HFNC flow according to P/F ratio prior to extubation. Flow will be set at 60, 50 40 L/min if P/F ratio \<250 mmHg, 250-300 mmHg and \>300 mmHg, respectively.

Flow of 60L/min

Setting HFNC flow at 60 L/min

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Flow of 60L/min

Intervention Type OTHER

Setting flow rate at 60L/min

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Flow of 40L/min

Setting flow rate at 40L/min

Intervention Type OTHER

Peak tidal inspiratory flow (PTIF) guided

Setting HFNC flow at 5 L/min above the peak tidal inspiratory flow (PTIF), up to a maximum of 60 L/min.

Intervention Type OTHER

PaO2/FiO2 ratio guided

Setting HFNC flow according to P/F ratio prior to extubation. Flow will be set at 60, 50 40 L/min if P/F ratio \<250 mmHg, 250-300 mmHg and \>300 mmHg, respectively.

Intervention Type OTHER

Flow of 60L/min

Setting flow rate at 60L/min

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Intubated and receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours
* Ready for planned extubation after passing a spontaneous breathing trial
* PaO2/FiO2 \<350 mmHg on the day of extubation

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<18 years
* On do-not-reintubate code
* Pregnant women
* Having tracheostomies
* Infeasibility of using HFNC
* Planning to use preventive NIV after extubation by the primary care team
* Life expectancy less than one month
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

National Taiwan University Clinical Trial Center

Sheng-Yuan Ruan, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sheng-Yuan Ruan, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

886223123456

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Research Ethics Committee of NTUH

Role: primary

886223951950

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202502078RINA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

HFNC vs Two Nare HFNC in Extubated Patients
NCT06398951 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA