High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Non-Invasive (NIV)in Both Hypoxemic and Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure.
NCT ID: NCT05499039
Last Updated: 2022-09-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-10-10
2024-10-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of HFNC compared to NIMV in management of Acute hypoxemic and acute hypercapneic respiratory failure
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficiency of HFNC Vs NIV in Patient With Acute Type 2 RF
NCT05698641
High Flow Oxygen and Non Invasive Ventilation for Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
NCT03627598
High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Non-invasive Ventilation in Prevention of Escalation to Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
NCT03788304
HVNI vs Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
NCT04998383
Evaluation of High Velocity Nasal Insufflation in Management of Respiratory Failure in Patients With Overlap Syndrome
NCT05190458
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* ARF can be categorized into acute hypoxemic respiratory failure(AHRF) and acute hypercapneic respiratory failure.
* Supplemental oxygen and treatment of the underlying cause is the mainstay of therapy for AHRF. Options for oxygen therapy include conventional oxygen therapy delivered via nasal cannulae (NC) or face masks (FM) initially, followed by non-invasive ventilation (NIV), and finally intubation or mechanical ventilation (MV) .
* Traditional NC and FM (collectively referred to as conventional oxygen therapy or COT) can achieve flow rates of up to 1 5 L/min. However, these flow rates may be significantly lower than patients' spontaneous inspiratory flow rates and the oxygen is diluted as it is mixed with room air Consequently, the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) delivered Is variable and this is thought to explain why many patients require an escalation of oxygen therapy to NIV or MV.
* By contrast, humidified high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy utilizes an air oxygen blend allowing from 21 % to 1 00% FiO2 delivery and generates up to 60 L/min flow rates The gas is heated and humidified through an active heated humidifier and delivered via a single limb heated inspiratory circuit (to avoid heat loss and condensation) to the patient through a large diameter nasal cannula Theoretically, HFNC offers significant advantages in oxygenation and ventilation over COT. Constant high flow oxygen delivery provides steady FiO2 and decreases oxygen dilution. It also washes out physiologic dead space and generates positive end expiration pressure (PEEP) that augments ventilation The heated humidification facilitates secretion clearance, decreases bronchospasm, and maintains mucosal integrity
* HFNC has been well studied in the neonatal and pediatric settings However, in adults, the use of HFNC has Primarily been studied in post-cardiac surgery post-extubation and bronchoscopy patients. However, the utility of HFNC use in adults with AHRF in emergency and general inpatient practice is less clear .Heated and humidified high-flow oxygen through nasal cannula (HFNC) has been developed over the past 2 decades, as an alternative to standard oxygen delivery systems
* . In adults, it has been used to treat hypoxemic respiratory failure, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, postoperatively and postextubation in do-not-intubate patients or during bronchoscopy
* To date, the literature supports the possibility to use HFNC as alternative to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in some settings, while in others might be even superior . It is also an alternative to standard oxygen as first line therapy in management of patients with acute respiratory failure . NIV is strongly recommended in patients with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure associated with acute respiratory acidosis, the vast majority of whom meet the criteria for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation
* Recently, Studies revealed no difference of the 30-day mortality and intubation rate between NIV and HFNC, in severe acute exacerbation of COPD with moderate, hypercapnic, acute respiratory failure. In a retrospective study, that suggeste that HFNC oxygen therapy was beneficial, even in respiratory failure Type 2, resulting in significant improvement of both oxygenation and hypercapnia. another study also indicated that HFNO leads to a flow-dependent reduction in PaCO2 in patients with stable hypercapnic COPD, due to a washout of the respiratory tract and a functional reduction in dead space
* Although cumulative evidence supports that HFNC is effective in patients with hypercapnia, randomized studies to compare HFNC vs. NIV in patients with acute, hypercapnic respiratory failure are missing. so the investigator conducting this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, involving patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED), to compare the efficacy of HFNC versus NIV in the management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A1 (NIVMV on hypoxemic)
Use of NIV on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients
Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (NIV)
Respiratory assistance is provided by a NIV either Puritan Bennet 840 , Engström Carestation or Hamilton-G5 , will be used for conventional non-invasive ventilation via an oronasal mask. Settings will be adjusted based on the clinical assessment of the respiratory therapist . Initial setting includes: -
Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP): 5 cmH2O. Pressure support (PS): 12-20 cmH2O. FiO2 will be adjusted to achieve a SpO2 at least 95% Intervention: Device: non-invasive ventilation
Group A2 (HFNC on hypoxemic)
Use of HFNC on acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC)
High flow nasal cannula consists of an apparatus that allows adjustable FiO2 from 21 to 100% and delivers a modified gas flow up to 60 l/ min .
will be set with: -
Temperature at 37°C or 34°C Flow rate 30: 50 L/min. FiO2 will be adjusted to achieve a SpO2 at least 95%
Group B1 (NIVMV on hypercapneic)
Use of NIV on acute hypercapneic respiratory failure patients
Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (NIV)
Respiratory assistance is provided by a NIV either Puritan Bennet 840 , Engström Carestation or Hamilton-G5 , will be used for conventional non-invasive ventilation via an oronasal mask. Settings will be adjusted based on the clinical assessment of the respiratory therapist . Initial setting includes: -
Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP): 5 cmH2O. Pressure support (PS): 12-20 cmH2O. FiO2 will be adjusted to achieve a SpO2 at least 95% Intervention: Device: non-invasive ventilation
Group B2 (HFNC on hypercapneic)
Use of HFNC on acute hypercapneic respiratory failure patients
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC)
High flow nasal cannula consists of an apparatus that allows adjustable FiO2 from 21 to 100% and delivers a modified gas flow up to 60 l/ min .
will be set with: -
Temperature at 37°C or 34°C Flow rate 30: 50 L/min. FiO2 will be adjusted to achieve a SpO2 at least 95%
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC)
High flow nasal cannula consists of an apparatus that allows adjustable FiO2 from 21 to 100% and delivers a modified gas flow up to 60 l/ min .
will be set with: -
Temperature at 37°C or 34°C Flow rate 30: 50 L/min. FiO2 will be adjusted to achieve a SpO2 at least 95%
Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (NIV)
Respiratory assistance is provided by a NIV either Puritan Bennet 840 , Engström Carestation or Hamilton-G5 , will be used for conventional non-invasive ventilation via an oronasal mask. Settings will be adjusted based on the clinical assessment of the respiratory therapist . Initial setting includes: -
Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP): 5 cmH2O. Pressure support (PS): 12-20 cmH2O. FiO2 will be adjusted to achieve a SpO2 at least 95% Intervention: Device: non-invasive ventilation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. (Participants admitted with acute hypoxemic respiratory with the following criteria:
RR\> 25 breath/minute Use of accessory muscles of respiration, paradoxical breathing, thoracoabdominal asynchrony.
Hypoxemia evidenced by PaO2 / FiO2 ratio \<300)
* Acute hypercapnic respiratory failure ((Participants admitted with acute hypercapneic respiratory with the following criteria:
pO2 less than 60 mm Hg (hypoxemia). pCO2 greater than 50 mm Hg (hypercapnia) with pH less than 7.35. Signs and symptoms of acute respiratory distress)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with cancer or transplant patients,
* Patients less than 18 years old
* Patients with Heart failure patients
* Patients with renal failure patients
* Patients with hemodynamic instability
* Patients with central causes of hypercapnic respiratory failure
* Patients with disturbed conscious level
* Patients who refuse to participate in the study
* Indication for emergency endotracheal intubation
* Tracheotomy or other upper airway disorders
* Active upper gastrointestinal bleeding
18 Years
95 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abdelrahman Alham
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Zein Al-abdeen Ah Sayed, professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assiut University
Taghred SA Meshref, professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assiut University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assiut University
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Peter At Rizk
Role: CONTACT
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HFNC VS NIV
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.