The Physiologic Effect of the Flow Generated by High Flow Nasal Cannula in Mild Respiratory Failure
NCT ID: NCT05708287
Last Updated: 2023-02-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-08-01
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effects of Flow Settings During High Flow Nasal Cannula for Adult Hypoxemia Patients
NCT03738345
Effects of High Flow Nasal Cannula on Deadspace Reduction and Regional Distribution of Ventilation
NCT02460653
Physiologic Effects of High-flow Nasal Cannula Versus Standard Oxygen Therapy Postextubation in Critically Ill Patients
NCT04711759
Effects of HFNC on Moderate and Severe Respiratory Failure Patients
NCT02687074
High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Non-Invasive (NIV)in Both Hypoxemic and Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure.
NCT05499039
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This method of non-invasive oxygen delivery has several presumed important working principals. Firstly, the high flow rate may meet the patient's own inspiratory flow rate. This enables accurate delivery of a high fractional inspired concentration of oxygen (FiO2). Second, the high gas flow might also produce a certain degree of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). In addition, the heated and humidified gas might also wash out/reduce the physiological airway dead space of the patient. Furthermore, HFNC is more comfortable and might be better tolerated than other Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) devices, such as Bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP). This, in turn, can prolong the time the patient is comfortably connected to the HFNC device.
Information regarding the basic physiologic influence of HFNC on oxygenation, ventilation and vital signs is missing in the literature. Patients with mild respiratory failure provide an opportunity to examine this topic. On one hand, these patients suffer from respiratory failure manifested by hypoxemia, on the other hand the respiratory failure is mild to the extent that removal of the conventional oxygen therapy (COT) will not lead to immediate respiratory collapse. This prospective study evaluates the physiologic effects of HFNC in 28 patients with mild respiratory failure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
all patients
HFNC
The patients with mild hypoxemia, defined as the need for conventional oxygen therapy (COT) using nasal cannula at 4-5 liters per minute (LPM) to maintain O2 Saturation \>90%, were commenced on HFNC therapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HFNC
The patients with mild hypoxemia, defined as the need for conventional oxygen therapy (COT) using nasal cannula at 4-5 liters per minute (LPM) to maintain O2 Saturation \>90%, were commenced on HFNC therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient had invasive blood pressure monitoring via an arterial line in situ
* The patient had a mild respiratory failure manifested by the need for oxygen support via nasal prongs in order to maintain oxygen saturation (SpO2) above 90% for at least one hour prior to the start of the intervention
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients regularly using O2 at home
* No patient consent for participation
18 Years
120 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hadassah Medical Organization
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hadassah medical center
Jerusalem, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HMO-20-0260
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.