Conventional Low Flow Oxygenation Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula in Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
NCT ID: NCT05497986
Last Updated: 2022-08-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
84 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-10-31
2024-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The role of HFNC is less clear in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Although non-invasive ventilation is the recommended treatment, it is associated with discomfort, and a significant proportion (up to 25% in some reports) cannot tolerate non-invasive ventilation. Observational reports and limited data from randomized controlled trials suggests that HFNC is effective in treating patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure.
We designed this trial to assess whether early application of HFNC in patients with non-severe hypercapnic respiratory failure can correct barometric abnormalities, and prevent progression to non-invasive ventilation or tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Non-Invasive Ventilation in Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
NCT03033251
High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Non-Invasive (NIV)in Both Hypoxemic and Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure.
NCT05499039
Comparison of High-flow Oxygen vs. BiPAP in Type II (Hypercapnic) Respiratory Failure
NCT03443479
High Flow Oxygen and Non Invasive Ventilation for Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
NCT03627598
HFNC and Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
NCT04109560
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High Flow Nasal Cannula
High flow nasal cannula
HFNC with the maximum tolerated flow (up to 60 L/min). Titration of supplemental oxygen to a SpO2 between 88 - 92%.
Conventional Oxygenation with low flow cannula
Conventional low flow oxygenation
Conventional oxygenation through nasal prongs or a facemask, with supplemental oxygen titrated to a SpO2 between 88 - 92%.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High flow nasal cannula
HFNC with the maximum tolerated flow (up to 60 L/min). Titration of supplemental oxygen to a SpO2 between 88 - 92%.
Conventional low flow oxygenation
Conventional oxygenation through nasal prongs or a facemask, with supplemental oxygen titrated to a SpO2 between 88 - 92%.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute Hypercapnic respiratory failure with pH \< 7.35 and pCO2 \> 45 mmHg
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who cannot read and understand French or English
* Hypercapnia secondary to a drug toxicity or non-pulmonary aetiology
* Hypercapnia secondary to exacerbation of asthma
* Contraindication to NIV
* Contraindication to HFNC
* Not for escalation to NIV based on a ceiling of care
* pH \< 7.15
* GCS 8 or less
* Shock defined as systolic \< 90 mmHg or a reduction by 20mmHg from usual systolic BP despite volume resuscitation
* Respiratory or cardio-respiratory arrest
* Any other indication that requires immediate invasive/non-invasive mechanical ventilation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hôpital de Verdun
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ivan Pavlov, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CIUSSS-Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CISSS-de-la-Montérégie-Centre
Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
CIUSSS de l'Est-de-l'ïle-de-Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Hôpital de Verdun
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Valérie Langlois-Carbonneau, M.D.
Role: primary
Massimiliano Iseppon, M.D.
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Verdun2022_01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.