Therapy With High-flow Oxygen by Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: a Crossover Physiologic Study

NCT ID: NCT03865056

Last Updated: 2019-03-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-15

Study Completion Date

2021-03-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background and rationale: A large multicenter randomized controlled trial demonstrated that in patients with hypoxemic non-hypercapnic respiratory failure treatment with nasal high flow oxygen (NHF) resulted in a reduction of the endotracheal intubation rate (38%) compared with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) delivered by facemask (50%) or with conventional oxygen therapy (47%), although the difference was not statistically significant. These results could be potentially explained by the physiological benefits provided by the NHF. However, one of the surprising findings of this study was that patients randomized to the facemask NIV group had a similar or even poorer outcome than oxygen alone. Interestingly, an observational study showed that in patients receiving facemask NIV for acute hypoxemia delivered tidal volumes were higher than expected (8.1-11.1 ml/kg predicted body weight), suggesting that NIV could potentially cause ventilator-induced lung injury resulting in worsening respiratory failure.

We, therefore, plan a crossover physiologic study investigating the hypothesis that compared with NIV the treatment with NHF of patients with acute hypoxemic non-hypercapnic respiratory failure results in a more homogeneous distribution of tidal volume, and hence less ventilator-induced lung injury, as measured by electrical impedance tomography (EIT).

Methods: This physiologic study will enroll 20 patients from the ICU at Toronto General Hospital in one year. Adult patients with acute hypoxemic non cardiogenic respiratory failure and PaO2:FiO2 ≤ 300 mmHg, respiratory rate \> 25 breaths/minute, PaCO2 ≤ 45 mmHg and absence of clinical history of underlying chronic respiratory failure will be eligible. Patients that received invasive mechanical ventilation for \> 48 hours in the same hospital admission, requiring immediate intubation, with hemodynamic instability (systolic arterial pressure \< 90 mmHg after optimal fluid therapy), with Glasgow Coma Scale \< 12, or contraindications to noninvasive ventilation and tracheostomy, will be excluded. After baseline assessment while receiving oxygen through facemask or nasal prongs, patients will receive in randomly assigned order NHF for 20 minutes and NIV for 20 minutes, in a crossover manner. EIT recordings, diaphragm ultrasound, and collection of blood samples for arterial blood gases will be performed at the end of each phase.

Data analysis: The primary endpoint is the comparison of the EIT intra-tidal ventilation index between treatment with NHF and NIV. As secondary endpoints, we will determine whether NHF, in comparison to NIV, provides respiratory support with lower global inhomogeneity index (EIT), lower tidal volumes, reduces respiratory muscle effort (respiratory rate and diaphragmatic ultrasound), and improves gas exchange (oxygen saturation, PaO2:FiO2, PaCO2, RR).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypoxemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Optiflow (High-flow Nasal Cannula)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Optiflow will be applied for 20 minutes

Noninvasive ventilation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Non-invasive Ventilation

Intervention Type DEVICE

non-invasive ventilation will be applied for 20 minutes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Optiflow (High-flow Nasal Cannula)

Optiflow will be applied for 20 minutes

Intervention Type DEVICE

Non-invasive Ventilation

non-invasive ventilation will be applied for 20 minutes

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Optiflow

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Hypoxemia defined by a ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2:FiO2) ≤ 300 while the patient is breathing oxygen through NHF for at least 15 minutes;
2. Respiratory rate \> 25 breaths/minute;
3. Partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) ≤ 45 mmHg;
4. Absence of clinical history of underlying chronic respiratory failure.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Lack of consent;
2. Age \< 18 years;
3. Invasive mechanical ventilation for \> 48 hours in the same hospital admission
4. Immediate need for intubation;
5. Previous inclusion in the present study;
6. Systolic arterial pressure \< 90 mmHg after optimal fluid therapy;
7. Cardiogenic pulmonary edema;
8. Glasgow Coma Scale \< 12;
9. Imminent death;
10. Contraindications to noninvasive ventilation;
11. Tracheostomy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

L:orenzo Del Sorbo, MD

Role: CONTACT

416-340-4800 ext. 8009

Felicity Backhouse, MSc

Role: CONTACT

416-340-4800 ext. 6056

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18-6194

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.