Standard Oxygen Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

NCT ID: NCT04468126

Last Updated: 2026-01-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1504 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-19

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

First-line therapy of patients with acute respiratory failure consists in oxygen delivery through standard oxygen, high-flow nasal oxygen therapy through cannula or non-invasive ventilation. Non-invasive ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is not recommended. In a large randomized controlled study, high-flow nasal oxygen has been described as superior to non-invasive ventilation and standard oxygen in terms of mortality but not of intubation. Paradoxically in immunocompromised patients, high-flow nasal oxygen has not been shown to be superior to standard oxygen. To improve the level of evidence of daily clinical practice, we propose comparing high-flow nasal oxygen versus standard oxygen, in terms of mortality in all patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Respiratory Failure Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

standard oxygen group

In order to maintain SpO2 between 92 and 96%

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard oxygen

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard low flow oxygen therapy through facemask or non-rebreathing mask at least 10 L/min.

high-flow nasal cannula oxygen group

At least 50 L/min adjusted in order to maintain SpO2 between 92 and 96 %

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High-flow nasal oxygen therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Humidified and heated oxygen with a gas flow at least 50 l/min through nasal cannula and inspired fraction of oxygen adjusted in order to maintain a SpO2 between 92 and 96%

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard oxygen

Standard low flow oxygen therapy through facemask or non-rebreathing mask at least 10 L/min.

Intervention Type OTHER

High-flow nasal oxygen therapy

Humidified and heated oxygen with a gas flow at least 50 l/min through nasal cannula and inspired fraction of oxygen adjusted in order to maintain a SpO2 between 92 and 96%

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All consecutive patients older than 18 years with an acute hypoxemic respiratory failure will be enrolled if they meet all the following criteria:

* Respiratory rate \>25 breaths/min whatever the oxygen support
* Pulmonary infiltrate,
* PaO2/FiO2 ≤200 mmHg
* Informed consent from the patient or relatives.

Exclusion Criteria

* PaCO2 \> 45 mm Hg
* Need for emergent intubation: pulse oximetry \< 90% with maximum oxygen support, respiratory arrest, cardiac arrest, or Glasgow coma scale below 8 points
* Hemodynamic instability defined by signs of hypoperfusion or use of vasopressors \> 0.3 µg/kg/min
* Glasgow coma scale equal to or below 12 points
* Exacerbation of chronic lung disease including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (grade 3 or 4 of Gold classification), or another chronic lung disease with long term oxygen or ventilatory support
* Cardiogenic pulmonary edema as main reason for acute respiratory failure
* Coronavirus SARS-2 infection as reason for acute respiratory failure (the SOHO-COVID study has been completed)
* Post-extubation respiratory failure within 7 days after extubation,
* Post-operative patients within 7 days after abdominal or cardiothoracic surgery,
* Do not intubate order;
* Already included in the study, refusal to participate or participation in another interventional study with the same primary outcome.
* Patients without any healthcare insurance scheme or not benefiting from it through a third party,
* Persons under law protection, namely minors, pregnant or breastfeeding women, persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Poitiers University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean-Pierre FRAT, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Poitiers

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHu Poitiers

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Frat JP, Coudroy R, Quenot JP, Guitton C, Badie J, Gacouin A, Ehrmann S, Demoule A, Jarousseau F, Carteaux G, Rigaud JP, Reignier J, Sedillot N, Contou D, Beloncle F, Daubin C, Dureau AF, Fatah A, Besse MC, Ferre A, Turbil E, Merdji H, Galerneau LM, Lacombe B, Richard JC, Romen A, Delbove A, Prat G, Lautrette A, Colin G, Soum E, Bourdin G, Hernandez G, Ragot S, Thille AW; REVA network. Effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus standard oxygen on mortality in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (SOHO). BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 23;14(10):e083232. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083232.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39448217 (View on PubMed)

Frat JP, Quenot JP, Badie J, Coudroy R, Guitton C, Ehrmann S, Gacouin A, Merdji H, Auchabie J, Daubin C, Dureau AF, Thibault L, Sedillot N, Rigaud JP, Demoule A, Fatah A, Terzi N, Simonin M, Danjou W, Carteaux G, Guesdon C, Pradel G, Besse MC, Reignier J, Beloncle F, La Combe B, Prat G, Nay MA, de Keizer J, Ragot S, Thille AW; SOHO-COVID Study Group and the REVA Network. Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen vs Standard Oxygen Therapy on Mortality in Patients With Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19: The SOHO-COVID Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022 Sep 27;328(12):1212-1222. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.15613.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36166027 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SOHO

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.