Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs. High-flow Nasal Cannula in Moderate-to-severe Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

NCT ID: NCT04502576

Last Updated: 2024-01-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-13

Study Completion Date

2022-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Helmet noninvasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula are novel tools for the first-line treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Compared to face-mask noninvasive ventilation in randomized trials, both have improved clinical outcome of patients with moderate-to-severe hypoxemic respiratory failure.

As compared to high-flow nasal cannula, helmet noninvasive ventilation improves oxygenation, reduces inspiratory effort, respiratory rate and dyspnea. Whether these physiological benefits are translated into improved outcome remains to be established.

The investigators designed a randomized trial to establish whether first line treatment with Helmet noninvasive ventilation is capable of increasing the number of 28-day respiratory-support-free days, as compared to high-flow nasal cannula in patients with moderate-to-severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High-flow nasal cannula

High-flow nasal cannula will be delivered with the Optiflow system. Initial set flow will be ≥ 50 /min and flows will be decreased in case of intolerance and/or according to patients' requirements: flows≥30 L/min will be mandatory in all enrolled patients. Humidification chamber (MR860, Fisher and Paykel healthcare, New Zealand) will be set at 37 °C or 34 °C according to patient's comfort. FiO2 will be titrated to obtain an SpO2≥92% and ≤98%.

The treatment according to the assigned protocol will be continued until the patient requires endotracheal intubation or (in case of no intubation) up to ICU discharge. Weaning from high-flow will be considered as standardized criteria are met.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Noninvasive respiratory support

Intervention Type DEVICE

In both arms, the treatment according to the assigned protocol will be continued until the patient requires endotracheal intubation or (in case of no intubation) up to ICU discharge.

Patients will have to undergo the allocated treatment within 1 hour from the moment of randomization and within 24 hours from admission in the intensive care unit

Helmet noninvasive ventilation

Patients will receive continuous helmet pressure support ventilation for at least 16 hours/day the first 2 calendar days. Continuous noninvasive ventilation without interruptions will be strongly encouraged in the first 24 hours of treatment. The ventilator will be set in pressure support mode. Use of continuous positive airway pressure by flow generators and Venturi systems instead of pressure support ventilation will be allowed in case of shortage of ventilators. Maintenance of positive end-expiratory pressure ≥ 8-10 during the treatment is mandatory.

After weaning and during any interruption from noninvasive ventilation, patients will undergo low-flow or high-flow oxygen, according to the decision of the attending physician.

The treatment according to the assigned protocol will be continued until the patient requires endotracheal intubation or (in case of no intubation) up to ICU discharge.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Noninvasive respiratory support

Intervention Type DEVICE

In both arms, the treatment according to the assigned protocol will be continued until the patient requires endotracheal intubation or (in case of no intubation) up to ICU discharge.

Patients will have to undergo the allocated treatment within 1 hour from the moment of randomization and within 24 hours from admission in the intensive care unit

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Noninvasive respiratory support

In both arms, the treatment according to the assigned protocol will be continued until the patient requires endotracheal intubation or (in case of no intubation) up to ICU discharge.

Patients will have to undergo the allocated treatment within 1 hour from the moment of randomization and within 24 hours from admission in the intensive care unit

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Acute-onset respiratory distress or flue-related symptoms Moderate-to-severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2\<=200 mmHg) PaCO2\<45 mmHg pH\>7.30

Exclusion Criteria

Need for urgent endo-tracheal intubation Exacerbation of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Documented pneumothorax Clinical diagnosis of Cardiogenic pulmonary oedema Do-not-intubate order Altered neurological status that requires immediate intubation and/or making the patient uncooperative Thoracic or abdominal surgery in the previous 7 days Recent head surgery or anatomy that prevent the application of helmet or Optiflow to patient's face
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Università degli studi di Chieti

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Societa Italiana Anestesia Analgesia Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Domenico Luca Grieco, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS

Massimo Antonelli, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

SS. Annunziata Hospital, Gabriele d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara

Chieti, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Arcispedale Sant'Anna, University of Ferrara

Ferrara, , Italy

Site Status

Infermi Hospital

Rimini, , Italy

Site Status

Fondazione Policlinico Universitaro A. Gemelli IRCCS

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Michi T, Mattana C, Menga LS, Bocci MG, Cesarano M, Rosa T, Gualano MR, Montomoli J, Spadaro S, Tosato M, Rota E, Landi F, Cutuli SL, Tanzarella ES, Pintaudi G, Piervincenzi E, Bello G, Tonetti T, Rucci P, De Pascale G, Maggiore SM, Grieco DL, Conti G, Antonelli M; Gemelli COVID-ICU study group. Long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. high-flow nasal oxygen: a randomized trial. J Intensive Care. 2023 May 19;11(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00669-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37208787 (View on PubMed)

Grieco DL, Menga LS, Cesarano M, Rosa T, Spadaro S, Bitondo MM, Montomoli J, Falo G, Tonetti T, Cutuli SL, Pintaudi G, Tanzarella ES, Piervincenzi E, Bongiovanni F, Dell'Anna AM, Delle Cese L, Berardi C, Carelli S, Bocci MG, Montini L, Bello G, Natalini D, De Pascale G, Velardo M, Volta CA, Ranieri VM, Conti G, Maggiore SM, Antonelli M; COVID-ICU Gemelli Study Group. Effect of Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen on Days Free of Respiratory Support in Patients With COVID-19 and Moderate to Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: The HENIVOT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 May 4;325(17):1731-1743. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4682.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33764378 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4443

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Helmet NIV in Acute Respiratory Failure
NCT05022173 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Helmet CPAP Versus HFNC in COVID-19
NCT04395807 TERMINATED NA