Helmet CPAP Versus HFNC in COVID-19

NCT ID: NCT04395807

Last Updated: 2021-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-03

Study Completion Date

2021-04-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We aim to investigate whether the use of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure using a Helmet device (Helmet CPAP) will increase the number of days alive and free of ventilator within 28 days compared to the use of a High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) in patients admitted to Helsingborg Hospital, Sweden, suffering from COVID-19 and an acute hypoxic respiratory failure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A detailed description can be found in the study protocol published in Trials in Dec 2020:

Tverring, J., Åkesson, A. \& Nielsen, N. Helmet continuous positive airway pressure versus high-flow nasal cannula in COVID-19: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial (COVID HELMET). Trials 21, 994 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04863-5

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COVID Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Helmet CPAP

Helmet Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CaStar hood for CPAP therapy by Starmed/Intersurgical) driven by high-flow blender (Bio-Med Devices).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Helmet CPAP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Start-up air flow 40 L/min. Start-up PEEP 5 cmH2O. Max PEEP 20 cmH2O. Oxygen flow / FiO2% according to 92% SpO2 target. Titrations at physician's choice.

HFNC

High-Flow Nasal Cannula (OptiflowTM nasal high-flow interface) driven by AIRVO 2 humidification system (Fisher and Paykel)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

HFNC

Intervention Type DEVICE

Start-up air flow 30 L/min. Max air flow 60 L/min. Oxygen flow / FiO2% according to 92% SpO2 target. Titrations at physician's choice.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Helmet CPAP

Start-up air flow 40 L/min. Start-up PEEP 5 cmH2O. Max PEEP 20 cmH2O. Oxygen flow / FiO2% according to 92% SpO2 target. Titrations at physician's choice.

Intervention Type DEVICE

HFNC

Start-up air flow 30 L/min. Max air flow 60 L/min. Oxygen flow / FiO2% according to 92% SpO2 target. Titrations at physician's choice.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years
2. Sars-Cov-2 found in the upper or lower respiratory tract by PCR during the current disease episode
3. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) \< 92 % despite conventional low-flow oxygen therapy of at least 6 L /min for at least 15 min
4. A decision to initiate HFNC or Helmet CPAP by the attending ward physician
5. The patient has given written informed consent to participate.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Need for direct admission to the intensive care unit for mechanical ventilation
2. Unconsciousness or drowsiness
3. Pneumothorax
4. Carbon dioxide pressure (pCO2) \> 6 kPa in venous blood gas (VBG)
5. Underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease stage III-IV
6. A decision not to participate
7. Inability to comprehend the study content and give informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Region Skane

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lund University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jonas Tverring, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lund University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Helsingborg's Hospital

Helsingborg, Region Skane, Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tverring J, Akesson A, Nielsen N. Helmet continuous positive airway pressure versus high-flow nasal cannula in COVID-19: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial (COVID HELMET). Trials. 2020 Dec 3;21(1):994. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04863-5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33272319 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COVID HELMET

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Helmet NIV in Acute Respiratory Failure
NCT05022173 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA