High-flow Nasal Oxygenation and Non-invasive Ventilation Strategies for the Treatment of Covid-19 Pneumonia

NCT ID: NCT05137431

Last Updated: 2022-08-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-08

Study Completion Date

2022-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

HFNO and NIV strategies are the most commonly used strategies for the treatment of hypoxia in patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 who are still followed in the intensive care unit, but there is no study comparing the two yet. In our prospective study, we aimed to compare these two treatment modalities. The primary goal is that the treatment is successful (weaned off HFNO/weaned off NIV: No need for HFNO or NIV and the patient recovers without the need for intubation). Failure will be evaluated as the need for intubation during treatment or the patient's death. Secondary aim is failure of treatment and discharge of patients from intensive care to service or home.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) is a deadly infection that causes a new type of severe acute respiratory syndrome. It has been reported that the mortality rate in critically ill patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 reached 61%. The primary pathology in these patients is progressive hypoxia due to lung injury and associated multi-organ damage. It has been reported that aggressive treatments such as tracheal intubation and classical mechanical ventilation to treat lung injury are not helpful or even harmful. The highest mortality rate was reported as 86% in these patients on mechanical ventilation. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developing in COVID-19 infection is not typical and is estimated to have a different mechanism, therefore it is emphasized that different strategies should be used for the treatment of ARDS in these patients. Two of the most important strategies used in these patients followed in the intensive care unit are high flow nasal oxygenation (High Flow Nasal Oxygenation-HFNO) and non-invasive ventilation (Non-Invasive Ventilation-NIV). HFNO is a method frequently used before intubation in adult patients with acute respiratory failure. It is based on the principle of giving warm and humidified oxygen to the patient through a nasal cannula in the range of 1-70 L/min. Due to the low number of mechanical ventilators in many intensive care units at the beginning of the pandemic, it was used in many COVID-19 patients and was found to be effective in later retrospective analyzes. It has been reported in many studies that HFNO therapy is more effective than conventional mask oxygen therapy. There are publications stating that it is more advantageous compared to NIV as it is easier to apply and more comfortable for the patient. Conventional NIV is called continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or Bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation. It is used as oxygen/ventilation therapy in SARS and H1N1 patients. Studies have reported that it is used in 70% of patients before tracheal intubation in COVID-19 patients. However, mortality was high in these patients.

HFNO and NIV strategies are the most commonly used strategies for the treatment of hypoxia in patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 who are still followed in the intensive care unit, but there is no study comparing the two yet. In our prospective study, we aimed to compare these two treatment modalities. The primary goal is that the treatment is successful (weaned off HFNO/weaned off NIV: No need for HFNO or NIV and the patient recovers without the need for intubation). Failure will be evaluated as the need for intubation during treatment or the patient's death. Secondary aim is failure of treatment and discharge of patients from intensive care to service or home.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COVID-19 Pneumonia COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High Flow Nasal Oxygenation-HFNO

The current will be adjusted from 50-70 liters. The patient's SpO2 value will be maintained at at least 92%. Arterial blood gas will be checked at the 1st hour

HFNO and NIV

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be treated alternately with 2 hours of HFNO and 1 hour of NIV (HFNO-NIV for the same patient in turn). In 24 hours, there will be 16 hours of HFNO, 8 hours of NIV.

Parameters to record

* Respiratory parameters (respiratory rate)
* SpO2
* Ventilator settings
* Patient's tolerance (VAS; between 0-100)
* Arterial blood gas (HFNO and NIV at 1 hour)
* Clinical parameters (D dimer, CRP, ROX index)

Intubation criteria

* Loss of consciousness
* Agitation
* Persistent hypotension
* Need for fluid resuscitation
* Need for vasopressor
* Respiration rate ≥40/min
* SpO2 \<92
* pH\<7.30

Non-Invasive Ventilation-NIV

Tidal volume will be adjusted to be 6-8 ml/kg. The respiratory rate will be \<30. The patient's SpO2 value will be maintained at at least 92%. The PEEP value will be 5 cmH2O. At the 1st hour, arterial blood gas will be checked.

HFNO and NIV

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be treated alternately with 2 hours of HFNO and 1 hour of NIV (HFNO-NIV for the same patient in turn). In 24 hours, there will be 16 hours of HFNO, 8 hours of NIV.

Parameters to record

* Respiratory parameters (respiratory rate)
* SpO2
* Ventilator settings
* Patient's tolerance (VAS; between 0-100)
* Arterial blood gas (HFNO and NIV at 1 hour)
* Clinical parameters (D dimer, CRP, ROX index)

Intubation criteria

* Loss of consciousness
* Agitation
* Persistent hypotension
* Need for fluid resuscitation
* Need for vasopressor
* Respiration rate ≥40/min
* SpO2 \<92
* pH\<7.30

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HFNO and NIV

Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be treated alternately with 2 hours of HFNO and 1 hour of NIV (HFNO-NIV for the same patient in turn). In 24 hours, there will be 16 hours of HFNO, 8 hours of NIV.

Parameters to record

* Respiratory parameters (respiratory rate)
* SpO2
* Ventilator settings
* Patient's tolerance (VAS; between 0-100)
* Arterial blood gas (HFNO and NIV at 1 hour)
* Clinical parameters (D dimer, CRP, ROX index)

Intubation criteria

* Loss of consciousness
* Agitation
* Persistent hypotension
* Need for fluid resuscitation
* Need for vasopressor
* Respiration rate ≥40/min
* SpO2 \<92
* pH\<7.30

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* PCR (+)
* P/F ≤300 mmHg (despite standard mask oxygen support from 15 L/min for 15 minutes)
* Respiratory rate ≥24/min or signs of respiratory failure (intercostal retraction, nasal wing breathing)

Exclusion Criteria

* Chronic respiratory failure
* Cardiogenic pulmonary edema
* Aplasia
* GCS ≤12
* Hemodynamic instability (use of vasopressors)
* Emergency intubation requirement
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medipol University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bahadir Ciftci

Primary researcher

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital

Istanbul, Bagcilar, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Calligaro GL, Lalla U, Audley G, Gina P, Miller MG, Mendelson M, Dlamini S, Wasserman S, Meintjes G, Peter J, Levin D, Dave JA, Ntusi N, Meier S, Little F, Moodley DL, Louw EH, Nortje A, Parker A, Taljaard JJ, Allwood BW, Dheda K, Koegelenberg CFN. The utility of high-flow nasal oxygen for severe COVID-19 pneumonia in a resource-constrained setting: A multi-centre prospective observational study. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov;28:100570. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100570. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33043285 (View on PubMed)

Frat JP, Brugiere B, Ragot S, Chatellier D, Veinstein A, Goudet V, Coudroy R, Petitpas F, Robert R, Thille AW, Girault C. Sequential application of oxygen therapy via high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: an observational pilot study. Respir Care. 2015 Feb;60(2):170-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03075. Epub 2014 Oct 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25294935 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Medipol Hospital 22

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.