A Prospective Trial of Elective Extubation in Brain Injured Patients.
NCT ID: NCT00729261
Last Updated: 2015-04-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-08-31
2006-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
We designed a safety and feasibility study of randomizing brain injured patients into early or delayed extubation. The purpose was to gain insight into patient safety concerns and to obtain estimates of sample size needed for a larger study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Risk Factors Regarding Extubation Failure in Severe Brain Injured Patients.
NCT02426242
The NEUROlogically-impaired Extubation Timing Trial
NCT02920580
Criteria of Extubation Failure of Brain Injured Patients. Elaboration of a Prognostic Score.
NCT02235376
Preventing Hypoxemia With Manual Ventilation During Endotracheal Intubation (PreVent) Trial
NCT03026322
The NEUROlogically-impaired Extubation Timing Trial (NEURO-ETT)
NCT04291235
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
armA I
Patients remain intubated until the patients Glasgow coma score improves to greater than 8.
continued intubation
patients remain intubated until their Glasgow coma scores improve to greater than 8.
arm 2
Patients that meet standard airway and ventilatory criteria for extubation but have a Glasgow coma score of less than or equal to 8 are immediately extubated.
extubation
Brian injured patients that remained intubation solely because of a depressed level of consciousness were randomized into immediate extubation or delayed extubation until their level of consciousness improved.All patients met standard ventilatory, and airway criteria for extubation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
extubation
Brian injured patients that remained intubation solely because of a depressed level of consciousness were randomized into immediate extubation or delayed extubation until their level of consciousness improved.All patients met standard ventilatory, and airway criteria for extubation.
continued intubation
patients remain intubated until their Glasgow coma scores improve to greater than 8.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Adequate gas exchange.
3. Adequate ventilation.
4. Respiratory rate to tidal volume ratio \<105.
5. Core body temperature \< 38 degrees celsius.
6. Hemoglobin \> 8 grams per deciliter.
7. No sedative medications for 2 hours.
Neurological requirements included:
1. GCS ≤ 8.
2. Intracranial pressure (ICP) \< 15 cm of water and a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) \> 60 mm Hg for patients with intracranial pressure monitors.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Lack of informed consent by the patients' surrogate.
3. Dependence on mechanical ventilation for at least two weeks prior to enrollment.
4. Patients with tracheostomies.
5. Intubation instituted for therapeutic hyperventilation.
6. Planned surgical or radiological intervention within the next 72 hours.
7. Anticipated neurological or medically worsening conditions (i.e develop cerebral edema or vasospasm).
8. Patients intubated for airway preservation due to airway edema (cervical neck injuries or surgery) as opposed to airway protection.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mayo Clinic
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Edward M. Manno, M.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Coplin WM, Pierson DJ, Cooley KD, Newell DW, Rubenfeld GD. Implications of extubation delay in brain-injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 May;161(5):1530-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9905102.
Manno EM, Rabinstein AA, Wijdicks EF, Brown AW, Freeman WD, Lee VH, Weigand SD, Keegan MT, Brown DR, Whalen FX, Roy TK, Hubmayr RD. A prospective trial of elective extubation in brain injured patients meeting extubation criteria for ventilatory support: a feasibility study. Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R138. doi: 10.1186/cc7112. Epub 2008 Nov 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1210-04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.