Predictors of Weaning Outcomes for Brain Injured Patients

NCT ID: NCT02863237

Last Updated: 2020-01-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-30

Study Completion Date

2018-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Brian injured patients are predisposed to various complications related to mechanical ventilation. Appropriate decision making of the weaning is crucial and validated predictive parameters are desirable. In present study, the investigators aim to a) validate the electrical activity of diaphragm (EAdi) derived parameters, and b) evaluate the traditional predictive parameters in weaning prediction in brain injured patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In general intensive care unit (ICU), about 20% patients are ventilated because of neurological illness. This proportion might be much higher in brain injured patients. As with general intensive care patients, brain injured patients are predisposed to a number of complications associated with mechanical ventilation. Both unnecessarily delaying and premature attempts of withdrawal of mechanical ventilation will increase the rate of complications, prolonged mechanical ventilation, the length of stay, motility, and the cost.

Numerous studies had examined factors that predict combined liberation/extubation outcomes, including vital capacity (VC), minute ventilation(VE), and maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), airway pressure developed 100 ms after the beginning of inspiration against an occluded airway (P0.1), breathing pattern variability (BPV), and the "rapid shallow breathing index" (RSBI, Breathing frequency-tidal volume ratio, f/Vt). The introduction of Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) has made available a standardized and validated method to monitor and measure diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi) both during conventional modes of ventilation and spontaneous breathing trail (SBT). Neuroventilatory efficiency index (NVE, Tidal volume - EAdi ratio, Vt/EAdi) and neuromechanical efficiency index (NME, tidal volume - EAdi ratio, Paw/EAdi) had also been proposed and showed a promising prospect.

However, all those physiological and mechanical parameters are either have limitations on using in brain injured patients, or have not yet been proved to be validity or even had a poor predictive ability. In part this is because respiratory failure of brain injured patient results from two principle etiologic entities: primary pulmonary dysfunction and neurogenic pulmonary dysfunction. The latter brings us quite different characters of brain injury patients, which required specially consideration. Another reason is that, patients with brain injured but no other indication for mechanical ventilation constitute a group in whom the needs for ventilatory support and for an artificial airway might be separate. Previous study that, in neurosurgical patients passed SBT, a median of 2 days elapsed before the attempted extubation, and 45% patients suffered reintubation or tracheostomies. Nonetheless, in most studies, disconnection of ventilatory support and extubation are often lumped together. Although some studies investigated the factors that are predictive of successful extubation, few study considered about the solely liberation of mechanical ventilation.

Therefore, in present study, the investigators separate the liberation of ventilatory support as a standalone part from the traditional weaning/extubation process. Patients are divided into two groups: weaning success and weaning failure, without consideration of the artificial airway status. The primary aims of the study are: a) validate the EAdi derived values, and b) evaluate the traditional predictive parameters in weaning prediction in brain injured patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Brain Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

weaning failure group

Patients reconnected to the ventilator within 48 hours after SBT will be designated the weaning failure group

No interventions assigned to this group

weaning success group

Patients who pass the SBT and breathing without ventilator support within 48 hours are designated the weaning success group

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 18 to 80 years
* Mechanical ventilation \> 24 hours
* Fulfilling the weaning screen criteria

Exclusion Criteria

* Moribund or brain dead
* With spinal injury
* Status epilepsy
* Contraindication to EAdi catheter placement
* Severe cardiac disease
* Company with chest or abdominal injury
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Capital Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jian-Xin Zhou

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jian-Xin Zhou, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ICU, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shi ZH, Jonkman AH, Tuinman PR, Chen GQ, Xu M, Yang YL, Heunks LMA, Zhou JX. Role of a successful spontaneous breathing trial in ventilator liberation in brain-injured patients. Ann Transl Med. 2021 Apr;9(7):548. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6407.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33987246 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KY2016-018-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.