Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-08-01
2022-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Transcranial Direct Stimulation on Cognitive Functions of Healthy Adults
NCT04873804
Influence of tDCS on Cortical Plasticity in Healthy Older Adults
NCT01888055
tDCS Effects on GABA Concentration and Brain Functional Connectivity in Older Adults Of Working Age
NCT02794272
Investigating Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Accelerating Learning in a Healthy Older Population
NCT03467698
tDCS of the Left dlPFC: Effects on Information Processing
NCT07168031
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of the study is to explore the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on either the right tempo-parietal junction (rTPJ) or the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) in healthy older adults (replication in a different sample of a study by Martin et al., 2020). 60 healthy older adults and 30 younger participants (serving as a control group) will be tested in a Reading the Eyes in the Mind Task (RMET) and a Task of Visual Perspective Taking (VPT) , while stimulation either the rTPJ or the dmPFC with either active or sham tDCS (stimulation only in the group of older participants). In the RMET the expectation is that older participants have higher reaction times after correct answers under rTPJ tDCS. No stimulation effects of the dmPFC are expected. In the VPT older participants are expected to have a selective effect on body position (similar to the results of Martin et al., 2020) under rTPJ stimulation, but not dmPFC stimulation.
A further focus of the study is how functional and structural connectivity of the brain and individual differences measured with an MRI assessment influence with the success of the RMET and VPT paradigms in an explorative research question.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
TRIPLE
Sham or active tDCS is applied via codes. Principal Investigators are blinded for these codes.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
dmPFC tDCS + Social Cognition tasks in older participants
Participants will receive either active or sham stimulation over the dmPFC while conducting two different social cognition paradigms: one regarding emotion recognition, one on visual perspective taking.
Social Cognition Task
Two paradigms will be tested: visual perspective taking and reading the mind in the eyes.
tDCS
tDCS either over the dmPFC or the rTPJ.
rTPJ tDCS + Social Cognition tasks in older participants
Participants will receive either active or sham stimulation over the rTPJ while conducting two different social cognition paradigms: one regarding emotion recognition, one on visual perspective taking.
Social Cognition Task
Two paradigms will be tested: visual perspective taking and reading the mind in the eyes.
tDCS
tDCS either over the dmPFC or the rTPJ.
Social cognition tasks in younger participants
Participants will conduct two different social cognition paradigms: one regarding emotion recognition, one on visual perspective taking but without tDCS stimulation.
Social Cognition Task
Two paradigms will be tested: visual perspective taking and reading the mind in the eyes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Social Cognition Task
Two paradigms will be tested: visual perspective taking and reading the mind in the eyes.
tDCS
tDCS either over the dmPFC or the rTPJ.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* German as their main language or sufficient german skills to understand the experiment and the task
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Medicine Greifswald
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marcus Meinzer, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitymedicine Greifswald
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medicine Greifswald
Greifswald, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Martin AK, Kessler K, Cooke S, Huang J, Meinzer M. The Right Temporoparietal Junction Is Causally Associated with Embodied Perspective-taking. J Neurosci. 2020 Apr 8;40(15):3089-3095. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2637-19.2020. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
Roheger M, Mader A, Riemann S, Niemann F, Kessler K, Martin AK, Meinzer M. Intact embodiment during perspective-taking in older adults is not affected by focal tDCS. Geroscience. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1007/s11357-025-01554-4. Online ahead of print.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SoCoStim
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.