Effects of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Task Performance in Healthy Adults
NCT ID: NCT06995560
Last Updated: 2025-05-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-10-25
2024-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary questions this study aims to answer are:
1. Does tES improve task performance, including speed, accuracy, and overall success, during a computerized track-and-capture task?
2. Do different stimulation targets produce differential effects on performance?
3. Are there short-term post-stimulation effects on task performance (up to 48 hours)?
Participants will:
1. Complete two testing sessions under either active or sham stimulation conditions.
2. Perform a complex operational task involving dual-hand controllers while undergoing tES or sham stimulation, and immediately after.
3. Return for follow-up task performance assessments at 24 and 48 hours post-stimulation to evaluate after-effects.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Modeling TMS-induced Cortical Network Activity
NCT05288959
Efficacy of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) on Emotion Processing
NCT04551118
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Neuromodulation of Executive Function Across Neuropsychiatric Populations
NCT04296604
Intensity-Dependent Effects of 4-week Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Learning in Healthy Young Adults
NCT07089069
Non-invasive Stimulation on Central Nervous System Excitability
NCT02659826
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Existing research has primarily focused on the effects of tES on simple cognitive tasks, with limited investigation into task that require multiple cognitive domain to operate simultaneously. Performance on complex tasks, such as those involving motor coordination, visual-spatial process, decision-making, and rapid response, may respond differently to tES than simple, isolated tasks. Understanding these effects could have broad applications in optimizing cognitive performance across various high-demand settings.
This study is designed to address several key uncertainties:
1. Inter-individual variability in behavioral and neurophysiological responses to tES.
2. the impact of stimulation parameters (location, type, intensity) on task performance.
3. The magnitude and duration of both immediate and post-stimulation effects on behavior.
To investigate these questions, healthy adults perform a computerized track-and-capture task requiring real-time motor control and decision-making using dual-hand controllers. Participants undergo both active and sham stimulation in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. Stimulation will target either the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex or the left anterior insula, guided by current flow modeling software. Performance is assessed during stimulation, immediately after, and at 24 and 48 hours post-stimulation to evaluate both immediate and short-term after-effects.
Outcome measures include task performance metrics (e.g., speed, accuracy, overall success) and neurophysiological data collected via non-invasive monitoring with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). The study is part of a broader research effort to characterize the functional impact of tES on complex behavior and to inform future applications in cognitive performance enhancement.
All stimulation procedures follow established safety guidelines for low-intensity tES, including continuous monitoring of electrode impedance and post-session adverse event questionnaires assessing discomfort, mood, and cognitive status. The Soterix Medical MXN-33 HD-tES system includes built-in safeguards to prevent excessive current delivery and to ensure safe electrode contact throughout the stimulation. Participants serve as their own controls in a within-subject crossover design, increasing statistical power for detecting within-subject differences between active and sham conditions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DLPFC Stimulation Group
Participants receive transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and perform a complex cognitive-motor task using the Robotic On-Board Trainer for Research (ROBoT-r) under both active and sham stimulation in a randomized, crossover design.
Active Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
Active tES delivered using the Soterix Medical MXN-33 HD-tES stimulator. Stimulation is applied via high definition electrodes targeting either the left DLPFC or L-aINS at intensities up to 1.9 mA. Stimulation is performed for up to 45 minutes during task execution. Participants perform the ROBoT-r task during stimulation.
Sham Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
Sham tES using the same Soterix Medical MXN-33 HD-tES stimulator and electrode placements. Stimulation ramps up and down over 20 seconds to mimic sensation but provides no continuous current. Participants perform the ROBoT-R task under sham conditions.
Anterior Insula Stimulation Group
Participants receive transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) targeting the left anterior insula and perform a complex cognitive-motor task using the Robotic On-Board Trainer for Research (ROBoT-r) under both active and sham stimulation in a randomized, crossover design.
Active Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
Active tES delivered using the Soterix Medical MXN-33 HD-tES stimulator. Stimulation is applied via high definition electrodes targeting either the left DLPFC or L-aINS at intensities up to 1.9 mA. Stimulation is performed for up to 45 minutes during task execution. Participants perform the ROBoT-r task during stimulation.
Sham Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
Sham tES using the same Soterix Medical MXN-33 HD-tES stimulator and electrode placements. Stimulation ramps up and down over 20 seconds to mimic sensation but provides no continuous current. Participants perform the ROBoT-R task under sham conditions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Active Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
Active tES delivered using the Soterix Medical MXN-33 HD-tES stimulator. Stimulation is applied via high definition electrodes targeting either the left DLPFC or L-aINS at intensities up to 1.9 mA. Stimulation is performed for up to 45 minutes during task execution. Participants perform the ROBoT-r task during stimulation.
Sham Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
Sham tES using the same Soterix Medical MXN-33 HD-tES stimulator and electrode placements. Stimulation ramps up and down over 20 seconds to mimic sensation but provides no continuous current. Participants perform the ROBoT-R task under sham conditions.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Master's or Doctorate degree, or equivalent relevant experience
* No history of head injury or neurological or psychiatric disorders
* No history of cardiac disease
* No metal implants in the head
* No implanted electronic devices
* Not taking medication affecting neural or cardiovascular function
* Able to provide written, dated informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Current illegal drug use
* Alcohol abuse
* Pregnancy (confirmed by urine test)
* Participation in another brain stimulation protocol withing the past month
25 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gary E. Strangman
Principle Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute
Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NNX16AO30G
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2020P002253
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.