Effects of Direct Current Brain Stimulation on Cognition

NCT ID: NCT00048698

Last Updated: 2008-03-04

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: PHASE1
• Total Enrollment: 170 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2002-11-30
• Study Completion Date: 2005-10-31

Brief Summary

This study will examine the effects of direct current (DC) electrical polarization of the brain on thinking speed, reaction time, mood, and brain waves in healthy individuals. The results will provide information for designing further studies to examine the safety and effectiveness of this technique in treating certain brain diseases involving impaired cognition (thought processing). The study consists of three experiments; participants will take part in either one or two of the experiments.

Healthy right-handed volunteers between 18 and 80 years of age with 12 or more years of education may be eligible for this study. Candidates will be screened with a medical and educational history and a brief neurological examination. Participants in experiments 2 and 3 will also be screened with a verbal fluency test in which they will be asked to say as many words beginning with certain letters as they can in 1 minute.

Participants will undergo the following procedures for the experiment(s) in which they participate:

Experiment 1

While resting quietly, subjects receive 20 minutes of weak electrical current stimulation or sham stimulation with no current. For the stimulation, two gauze pads soaked with a conducting salt solution are placed on the head-one on the left side and one above the right eye. The current is passed between the pads and may cause an itching or tingling sensation under the electrodes. Before and after the stimulation, the participant's reaction time-tested by moving a finger as fast as possible at the sound of a tone-and mood are evaluated. Some participants also have an electroencephalogram, or EEG (brain wave recording) during the experiment. After the stimulation, participants take two brief tests of thinking speed, and the mood and reaction time tests are repeated.

Experiment 2

The participant sits in a chair with electrodes attached to the muscles that control movement in a finger on the right hand. Reaction time is tested as described in experiment 1. Then, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used to test the activity of the brain's motor cortex (the part of the brain that controls movement). For TMS, an insulated wire coil is placed on the subject's scalp. A brief electrical current is passed through the coil, creating a magnetic pulse that travels through the scalp and skull and causes small electrical currents in the brain cortex. The stimulation may cause twitching of the right hand or arm or produce a mild snapping sensation on the scalp. During the stimulation, the electrical activity of muscles in the right hand is recorded on a computer. Following the TMS, DC stimulation is applied, as described in experiment 1. The stimulation begins at a low level and is followed by repeat TMS and DC stimulation at increasingly higher levels. This continues until there is a clear effect on the muscle response to the magnetic pulses, or until the stimulation becomes uncomfortable. At the end of the electrical stimulation, reaction time is tested again.

Experiment 3

This experiment uses the average DC level that produced a change in the size of the responses to magnetic stimulation in experiment 2. Thinking speed and reaction time are tested during the DC stimulation, and the mood test is given before and during the stimulation. This test does not use TMS or EEG recording.

Detailed Description

The passage of weak DC currents across the head (DC polarization) has been done for centuries with various effects reported. Many of the reports and studies of DC effects in humans are, however, archaic, anecdotal, uncontrolled, or scientifically baseless. Recently, it has been shown by objective means, in controlled experiments, that this type of treatment has robust and lasting effects on the excitability of the motor cortex in healthy humans. In vitro and animal experiments have revealed little about the mechanism of this effect, but neither has convincing evidence of toxicity been found at moderate doses. Therefore, we are becoming interested in whether this type of treatment can be used to improve cognitive processing in individuals with brain lesions, particularly of the prefrontal cortex. The purpose of this project is to prepare the way for clinical trials by beginning to establish the safety of this technique in humans and then to look for preliminary evidence of potentially useful effects on cognition when moderate doses are applied to the prefrontal cortex. First, we propose to test the safety of 20 min of anodal and cathodal DC applied the left prefrontal area, at 1 mV, by looking for clinical-level effects on verbal fluency, cognitive processing speed, EEG, mood, or motor reaction speed after exposure. The duration of exposure in this study will match the time required to gather preliminary efficacy data in healthy controls and patients. Then, in a dose-finding study, we propose to find the anodal DC amperage necessary for producing a clear effect on excitability, as measured by an increase in the amplitude of the motor evoked potential to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Then, if no significant adverse effects are in the first two studies, a preliminary efficacy study will look for differences in these measures between groups receiving anodal, cathodal, and sham DC of the left prefrontal cortex during stimulation.

Conditions

Electrical Stimulation of the Brain

Study Design

• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT

Interventions

TMS

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

EEG

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Participants will be right-handed healthy volunteers aged 18-80 with greater than or equal to 12 years of education.

Subjects must perform within one standard deviation of the mean on screening with the verbal fluency test.

Exclusion Criteria

Current serious medical or psychiatric condition of any kind.

History of any significant trauma or medical condition affecting the brain or skull.

History of epileptic seizure.

History of significant psychiatric illness, i.e. requiring medication or hospitalization.

Current use of neuroactive medication or recreational drugs.

History of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), learning disorder, or any other cognitive deficit.

Pregnancy.

Presence of metal in the head other than dental hardware.

Broken skin in the area of the stimulating electrodes.

• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role: lead

Locations

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Countries

United States

References

Agnew WF, McCreery DB. Considerations for safety in the use of extracranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials. Neurosurgery. 1987 Jan;20(1):143-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-198701000-00030.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 3808255 (View on PubMed)

Baudewig J, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Frahm J. Regional modulation of BOLD MRI responses to human sensorimotor activation by transcranial direct current stimulation. Magn Reson Med. 2001 Feb;45(2):196-201. doi: 10.1002/1522-2594(200102)45:23.0.co;2-1.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 11180425 (View on PubMed)

Burke D, Hicks R, Gandevia SC, Stephen J, Woodforth I, Crawford M. Direct comparison of corticospinal volleys in human subjects to transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation. J Physiol. 1993 Oct;470:383-93. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019864.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 8068071 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

03-N-0017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

030017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id