Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-01
2027-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Cognitive Processing
NCT01602263
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Deficits After Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT02613936
tDCS and Cognition in Adults With Multiple Sclerosis or Encephalitis
NCT02538094
Cognitive Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Older Adults
NCT01611103
Treating Traumatic Brain Injury With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
NCT06989970
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings in those with psMCI show temporal dispersion consistent with generalized disruption of cognitive networks during resting state, irrespective of lesion location. Evaluation of frequency spectra show bilaterally decreased beta power in the frontoparietal lobes correlating with impaired reaction times. Functional connectivity analyses at 6 months demonstrate increased inter-hemispheric connections that may explain or reflect a patient's improvement. It is currently unknown whether specific cognitive networks are involved, though based on the pattern of clinical deficits it would be reasonable to hypothesize that the frontoparietal network, responsible for executive function and higher level cognitive tasks, is disrupted to a greater extent than the limbic, responsible for emotion and memory. Neural modulation with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) increases the likelihood of neural firing, strengthening connectivity by promoting long-term potentiation and facilitating task performance. As anodal tDCS only induces the firing of neurons near threshold, it follows that it is most effective and longest acting when paired with a task that engages focal activation. This is best seen in patients with aphasia undergoing speech-language therapy.
In this study, the investigators will determine the utility of A-tDCS in conjunction with computerized cognitive therapy (CCT) to treat psMCI. The investigators will recruit approximately 60 patients with subacute minor stroke and randomize the patients to A-tDCS administered over the ipsilesional frontoparietal cortex versus sham plus 15 sessions of cognitive therapy using a widely used online platform focused most on executive functioning and processing speed based on the investigators' preliminary work targeting deficits most specific to those with psMCI. The investigators hypothesize that tDCS will augment both generalized connectivity as well as the connectivity of specific networks targeted during training (most notably the frontoparietal) and that patients will show increased clinical improvement acutely after therapy that will last for months after treatment.
Along with clinical evaluation, the investigators will use MEG to evaluate cerebral activation patterns and connectivity pre- (1 month post-infarct) and post- (3 and 6 months post-infarct) intervention. The investigators will collect longitudinal MEG and clinical data through a multicenter collaboration of experts in the fields of stroke, dementia, and functional neuroimaging.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A-tDCS
Participants randomized to tDCS will undergo 15- 30 minute sessions over 5 weeks of A-tDCS to the ipsilesional frontoparietal cortex while participating in computerized cognitive therapy (CCT).
Anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (A-tDCS)
Participants randomized to tDCS will undergo 5 weeks of A-tDCS + CCT.
Sham Intervention
Participants randomized to sham will undergo 15- 30 minute sessions over 5 weeks of a sham-intervention, also applied to the ipsilesional frontoparietal cortex, while participating in computerized cognitive therapy (CCT).
Sham Intervention
Participants randomized to sham-intervention will undergo 5 weeks of sham + CCT.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (A-tDCS)
Participants randomized to tDCS will undergo 5 weeks of A-tDCS + CCT.
Sham Intervention
Participants randomized to sham-intervention will undergo 5 weeks of sham + CCT.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Evidence on brain MRI of acute ischemic stroke (imaging negative strokes and TIAs will be excluded).
3. Native English speaker (by self-report) prior to stroke.
4. NIHSS \<8 at initial follow-up visit (approximately 30 days post-stroke).
5. mRS 0-2 at initial follow-up visit.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Presence of proximal large vessel occlusion.
3. Cortical exam findings including aphasia or neglect.
4. Prior report or history of dementia or undertreated psychiatric illness.
5. Uncorrected hearing or visual loss.
6. Inability to attend treatment or follow-up sessions.
7. Inability to travel to College Park (UMD) for MEG recording sessions.
8. Presence of any of the following that would lead to significant artifact on MEG: cardiac pacemaker, intracranial clips, metal implants or external clips within 10mm of the head, metal implants in the eyes (unlikely given that all patients will have an MRI and criteria are similar).
9. Claustrophobia, obesity, and/or any other reason leading to difficulty staying in the MEG machine for up to 1 hour.
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Maryland, College Park
OTHER
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elisabeth B Marsh, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Marsh EB, Brodbeck C, Llinas RH, Mallick D, Kulasingham JP, Simon JZ, Llinas RR. Poststroke acute dysexecutive syndrome, a disorder resulting from minor stroke due to disruption of network dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 29;117(52):33578-33585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013231117. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
Marsh EB, Lawrence E, Hillis AE, Chen K, Gottesman RF, Llinas RH. Pre-stroke employment results in better patient-reported outcomes after minor stroke: Short title: Functional outcomes after minor stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;165:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.12.020. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
Sharma R, Mallick D, Llinas RH, Marsh EB. Early Post-stroke Cognition: In-hospital Predictors and the Association With Functional Outcome. Front Neurol. 2020 Dec 23;11:613607. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.613607. eCollection 2020.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Marsh Lab website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00315010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.