Thermic Effect of Three Different Meals in Healthy Women

NCT ID: NCT04440826

Last Updated: 2024-04-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

11 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-23

Study Completion Date

2015-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will investigate the acute effect of three isocaloric meals varying in level of food processing, including a whole foods, gluten-free, and highly processed meal on energy metabolism and blood glucose in 8-12 young adult, normal weight females. A secondary aim of this proposed study is to compare palatability, satiety, and perceived energy ratings among highly processed, unrefined, and gluten-free unrefined isocaloric meals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A shift towards a diet containing large quantities of highly processed foods is believed to be a major contributor to the trends in obesity. The degree of processing of foods often affects the nutritional content of the constituents. A reduction in macromolecular complexity allows for an increased rate of digestion, meaning that the body does not have to work as hard to metabolize high processed food products. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effect on energy metabolism and blood glucose after the consumption of an unrefined, whole foods meal versus two highly processed food meals, including a common Western style meal and gluten-free meal in 8-12 young adult, normal weight females. A secondary aim of this proposed study is to compare palatability, satiety, and perceived energy ratings among highly processed, unrefined, and gluten-free unrefined isocaloric meals. It is hypothesized that an unrefined meal will induce a greater postprandial thermogenic response and a smaller blood glucose response than a highly processed or gluten-free meal. Additionally, it is hypothesized that a highly processed foods meal will be considered more palatable than an unrefined or gluten-free meal.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Weight Loss Obesity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Whole Food Meal

Whole foods meal - grilled cheese and drink meal

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Whole Food Meal

Intervention Type OTHER

Whole foods meal

Processed Food Meal

Highly processed foods - grilled cheese and drink meal

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Processed Food Meal

Intervention Type OTHER

Processed food meal

Gluten-Free and Lactose-Free Meal

Gluten-free and lactose-free foods - grilled cheese and drink meal

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gluten-free and lactose-free

Intervention Type OTHER

Gluten-free and lactose-free food meal

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Whole Food Meal

Whole foods meal

Intervention Type OTHER

Processed Food Meal

Processed food meal

Intervention Type OTHER

Gluten-free and lactose-free

Gluten-free and lactose-free food meal

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy females between the ages of 18 and 24 years that have BMIs that fall in the range of 18.5 kg/m2 to 28 kg/m2.

Exclusion Criteria

* Those with a history of celiac disease or other food allergies, metabolic disease or heart disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

24 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Skidmore College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mary Hoehn, MPH

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Skidmore College

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1502-441

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

GOS and Insulin Sensitivity
NCT02271776 COMPLETED NA
Almond Consumption and Glycemia
NCT03236116 COMPLETED NA