HIIT Versus MICT on Abdominal Fat Mass and Lipid Oxidation in Postmenopausal Women (MATISSE)
NCT ID: NCT03357016
Last Updated: 2018-08-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-02-01
2018-06-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Most exercise programs designed for weight loss have focused on about 30 min several times per week of moderate intensity continuous training (MICT). Disappointingly, such exercise programs have led to either none or low fat loss. Accumulating evidence suggests that high intensity interval training (HIIT) should be an effective exercise protocol for reducing body fat of overweight individuals, especially at the abdominal level.
Resistance Training (RT) is associated with increased muscle mass and strength gain in main muscles groups. Thus, RT seems to be an interesting strategy to fight against deconditioning and autonomy loss with age. Development of muscle mass enhances resting metabolism rate. Thus, RT could raise daily energy expenditure ie. substrates' oxidation including lipids.
The aim of our study was to compare the effects of a 12-week moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) program with high intensity interval training (HIIT) program combined or not with a resistance training (RT) program on total abdominal and visceral fat mass and substrate utilization in postmenopausal women.
It is hypothesized that HIIT compared to MICT program would result in significantly greater whole body and regional fat mass losses (abdominal and visceral) and would improve lipid oxidation at rest and during prolonged moderate exercise. It is also hypothesized that HIIT associated with RT could be the best strategy to reduce fat mass.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biking vs. Running: Comparison of EPOC, Substrate Oxidation, Appetite and Energy Intakes in Men With Overweight/Obesity.
NCT06082310
High-Intensity Interval Training and Fat Mass Losses
NCT05311800
High-intensity Interval Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Overweight Women
NCT03300895
High-intensity Training for Improving Physical Performance of Aged Women
NCT03840330
High-intensity Intermittent Training for Obese Individuals
NCT01143376
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Most exercise programs designed for weight loss have focused on about 30 min several times a week of moderate intensity continuous training (MICT). Disappointingly, such exercise programs have led to either none or low fat losses. Accumulating evidence suggests that high intensity interval training (HIIT) could be an effective exercise protocol for reducing adipose tissue of overweight individuals, especially at the abdominal level. HIIT involves brief high-intensity, anaerobic exercise followed by brief but slightly longer bouts of very low-intensity exercise.
Resistance training (RT) program are currently proposed in order to reduce fat mass / preserve fat-free mass. Their beneficial effects have been demonstrated, especially in the elderly. Through development (or maintenance) of muscle mass, RT increases resting metabolism rate, daily energy expenditure, and substrate (fatty acids) oxidation.
The aim of the study was to compare the effects of a 12-week moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) program with high intensity interval training (HIIT) combined or not with resistance training (RT) program on total, abdominal and visceral fat mass and substrate utilization at rest and during exercise in postmenopausal women.
36 postmenopausal women will be randomly assigned to MICT (n= 12) or HIIT (n= 12) or HIIT + RT (n= 12) group. Subjects performed three sessions per week during 12 weeks, on bicycle.
MICT: For the MICT protocol, each subject performed 35 min at 50% maximal aerobic power (MAP).
HIIT: For the HIIT protocol, each subject performed repeated cycles of sprinting for 8 s and pedaling slowly for 12 s (between 20 and 30 rpm) for a maximum of 60 repeats per session.
HIIT+RT: For the HIIT+RT protocol, each subject performed HIIT protocol. Then they performed a single set of 8 exercises with 1 or 2min resting period between exercises. Each set consisted of 8-12 repetitions at about 80% maximum repetition (MR).
Total body and regional fat content will be measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) before and after the intervention (3 months).
The investigators will examine the effects of HIIT, MICT and HIIT + RT programs on:
* Total fat mass (and appendicular fat mass) (DEXA)
* Total fat free mass (and appendicular fat free mass) (DEXA)
* Glycemic profile (plasma HbA1c, plasma glucose)
* Lipid profile (TG, HDL, LDL, total cholesterol)
* Substrates oxidation at rest and during moderate exercise (40min, 50% of maximal oxygen consumption VO2 max)
Statistical analysis
Appropriate sample size has been calculated given previous results about fat mass loss during HIIT in women and considering the dropouts observed in this type of protocol.
Gaussian distribution of the data will be tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Data will be presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Comparisons between groups will be made with Mann \& Whitney U test or ANOVA when appropriate. Relationships between data will be assessed by Pearson correlation. Significance will be accepted at the p\<0.05 level. Statistical procedures will be performed using Statistica software.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High Intensity Interval Training program (HIIT)
Subjects perform three sessions of training during 12 weeks: 35 min at 50% maximal aerobic power on bicycle.
Training programs
High Intensity Interval Training program (HIIT) vs. Moderate Intensity Continuous Training program (MICT) vs. High Intensity Interval Training program + Resistance Training program (HIIT+RT)
Moderate Intensity Continuous Training program (MICT)
Subjects perform three sessions of training during 12 weeks: repeated cycles of sprinting for 8s and pedaling slowly for 12s (between 20 and 30 rpm) for a maximum of 60 repeats per session.
Training programs
High Intensity Interval Training program (HIIT) vs. Moderate Intensity Continuous Training program (MICT) vs. High Intensity Interval Training program + Resistance Training program (HIIT+RT)
HIIT + Resistance Training program (RT)
Subjects perform three sessions of training during 12 weeks: Each subject performed HIIT protocol and then a single set of 8 exercises with 1 ou 2min resting period between exercises. Each set consisted of 8-12 repetitions at about 80% maximum repetition.
Training programs
High Intensity Interval Training program (HIIT) vs. Moderate Intensity Continuous Training program (MICT) vs. High Intensity Interval Training program + Resistance Training program (HIIT+RT)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Training programs
High Intensity Interval Training program (HIIT) vs. Moderate Intensity Continuous Training program (MICT) vs. High Intensity Interval Training program + Resistance Training program (HIIT+RT)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* BMI ≥ 25 and \< 40
* Able to follow an exercise protocol
* Eating behavior and physical activity stable since at least 3 month
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject not able to perform bicycle exercise (pains)
* Chronic infection
* Use of β-blocker
* Medical treatment that could interfere with the different outcome measures
* Hormonal Replacement Therapy (HRT)
* Regular consumption of alcohol
* Refusal to sign the consent form
55 Years
82 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CREPS Vichy Auvergne
UNKNOWN
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
OTHER
Laboratoire des Adaptations Métaboliques à l'Exercice en conditions Physiologiques et Pathologiques
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Martine Duclos, Pr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHRU Gabriel Montpied Clermont-Ferrand
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CREPS Vichy Auvergne
Bellerive-sur-Allier, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-A01742-49
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
AU1303
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.