Comparison of Non-Invasive Methods of Assessing Fluid Responsiveness in ED and ICU Patients
NCT ID: NCT02679625
Last Updated: 2020-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-11-01
2019-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To date, three major ultrasonographic modalities have emerged as viable candidates for the bedside assessment of FRes: 1) measurement of dynamic changes in inferior vena caval diameter (IVC-CI), 2) measurement of dynamic changes in peripheral arterial waveform derived variables (PA Doppler), and 3) echocardiographic measurement of dynamic changes in left ventricular outflow tract waveform derived variables (LVOT Doppler). In this study, the investigators will perform the first direct comparison of techniques representing all three of the above modalities in the prediction of FRes against a non-invasive bioreactance cardiac output monitor (the Cheetah NICOM™), which has been extensively validated against gold-standard invasive methods of cardiac output measurement. The investigators will compare the accuracy of these modalities in both spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients using passive leg raise testing (PLR) as a surrogate for volume challenge. In addition, the investigators will also elicit information from the treating physician(s) on their clinical assessment of FRes.
The investigators will recruit adult patients in the ED and ICU with sepsis, who have received an initial bolus of 20-30 cc/kg of IV fluid, and can tolerate the PLR and US procedures. Prior to US and NICOM measurement, investigators will ask the attending physician managing the patient regarding their assessment of the their fluid status. Then, separate investigators will perform US and NICOM measurements independently to ensure blinding. NICOM data, which has been well validated in septic patients, will be shared with the attending physician. They will then be asked if this new data will change management.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fluid Responsiveness Prediction at the Bedside
NCT00721604
Fluid Responsiveness Evaluation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension
NCT02837731
Non-invasive Fluid Management
NCT02892799
Hemodynamic Optimization By Non-Invasive Determination Of Cardiac Output In Critically Ill Patients
NCT01309724
Timing and Dose of Fluid Deresuscitation in Critically Ill Patients
NCT07275658
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The timeframe for measurement is within 72 hours of the subjects' admission. Determination of the outcome (i.e., whether a subject is fluid responsive) is based upon the data generated by the NICOM device. The NICOM generates data within 5 minutes of assessment. The ultrasound modalities to be studied will generate data within 5 minutes of assessment as well. The US data will be compared to the NICOM data to generate the statistics listed in this protocol. There is no further planned follow-up for the subjects.
1. The investigators will compare the ability of dynamic changes in inferior vena caval diameter (IVC-CI), dynamic changes in peripheral arterial waveform derived variables (PA Doppler), and dynamic changes in left ventricular outflow tract waveform derived variables (LVOT Doppler) to detect fluid responsiveness (FRes) relative to FRes as assessed by bioreactance cardiac output monitoring before and after passive leg raise (PLR).
Hypothesis: PA Doppler and LVOT Doppler will have superior sensitivity and specificity to predict FRes in comparison to IVC-CI.
2. The investigators will evaluate data acquisition duration and data acquisition failure rate of IVC-CI, PA Doppler, and LVOT Doppler. Hypothesis: PA Doppler will have shorter data acquisition durations in comparison to LVOT velocity variation and IVC-CI.
Hypothesis: PA Doppler will have lower data acquisition failure rates in comparison to LVOT velocity variation and IVC-CI.
3. The investigators will compare the ability of IVC-CI, PA Doppler, and LVOT Doppler to predict FRes in comparison to FRes as predicted by clinical judgment.
Hypothesis: PA Doppler and LVOT Doppler will have superior sensitivity and specificity to predict FRes in comparison to clinical judgment.
4. The investigators will evaluate the ability of dynamic changes in PA corrected flow times (cFT) to detect FRes relative to FRes as assessed by bioreactance cardiac output monitoring before and after PLR. Hypothesis: cFT will have greatest sensitivity and specificity to predict FRes at a Δflow time threshold of ≥15% after PLR.
Hypothesis: At a Δflow time threshold of ≥15%, cFT will have superior sensitivity and specificity to detect FRes in comparison to IVC-CI.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound and NICOM
All patients enrolled will have all three ultrasound-based modalities for fluid responsiveness performed, as well as have NICOM data to serve as the comparison standard.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adult between the age of 18 to 90 years old;
* Not pregnant;
* Not using non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or BiPAP);
* No history of heart, lung, and/or liver transplant;
* Not determined by the clinical team to be acutely unstable requiring immediate intervention at the time of data collection, and;
* No contraindications to a passive leg raise test (known or suspected cranio-cerebral or C-spine injury, venous thrombosis, orthopedic injury requiring immobilization or traction, or other contraindications as per clinical team).
Exclusion Criteria
* Using non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or BiPAP);
* Presence of or suspected elevated intracranial pressure;
* Presence of central venous catheters or other medical devices that prevent the use of bedside ultrasound;
* History of heart, lung, and/or liver transplant;
* History of critical aortic stenosis or severe aortic insufficiency;
* Determined by the clinical team to be acutely unstable and requiring immediate intervention at the time of study enrollment or data collection or;
* Has a contraindication to passive leg raise maneuver, e.g. known cervical spinal injury, deep venous thrombosis, orthopedic injury requiring immobilization or traction.
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Olive View-UCLA Education & Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alan Chiem, M.D.
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alan Chiem, MD MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Olive View-UCA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Olive View-UCLA
Sylmar, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB #14H-136004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.