Comparison of Non-Invasive Methods of Assessing Fluid Responsiveness in ED and ICU Patients

NCT ID: NCT02679625

Last Updated: 2020-04-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-01

Study Completion Date

2019-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Accurate assessment of fluid responsiveness (FRes) is central to guiding fluid management in septic and critically ill patients. As evidence accumulates that both inadequate and excessive fluid resuscitation are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, it is simultaneously becoming increasingly clear that current widely used methods to predict FRes are of questionable accuracy. The optimal technique to predict FRes would be a non-invasive point-of-care test with not only a high degree of accuracy, but also one which requires minimal training to perform correctly and may be easily performed repeatedly for serial evaluation of FRes during the ongoing management of the critically ill patient.

To date, three major ultrasonographic modalities have emerged as viable candidates for the bedside assessment of FRes: 1) measurement of dynamic changes in inferior vena caval diameter (IVC-CI), 2) measurement of dynamic changes in peripheral arterial waveform derived variables (PA Doppler), and 3) echocardiographic measurement of dynamic changes in left ventricular outflow tract waveform derived variables (LVOT Doppler). In this study, the investigators will perform the first direct comparison of techniques representing all three of the above modalities in the prediction of FRes against a non-invasive bioreactance cardiac output monitor (the Cheetah NICOM™), which has been extensively validated against gold-standard invasive methods of cardiac output measurement. The investigators will compare the accuracy of these modalities in both spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients using passive leg raise testing (PLR) as a surrogate for volume challenge. In addition, the investigators will also elicit information from the treating physician(s) on their clinical assessment of FRes.

The investigators will recruit adult patients in the ED and ICU with sepsis, who have received an initial bolus of 20-30 cc/kg of IV fluid, and can tolerate the PLR and US procedures. Prior to US and NICOM measurement, investigators will ask the attending physician managing the patient regarding their assessment of the their fluid status. Then, separate investigators will perform US and NICOM measurements independently to ensure blinding. NICOM data, which has been well validated in septic patients, will be shared with the attending physician. They will then be asked if this new data will change management.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a diagnostic accuracy study comparing selected ultrasound techniques to a well validated standard for predicting fluid responsiveness in septic patients (NICOM). The primary outcomes will be reported in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves.

The timeframe for measurement is within 72 hours of the subjects' admission. Determination of the outcome (i.e., whether a subject is fluid responsive) is based upon the data generated by the NICOM device. The NICOM generates data within 5 minutes of assessment. The ultrasound modalities to be studied will generate data within 5 minutes of assessment as well. The US data will be compared to the NICOM data to generate the statistics listed in this protocol. There is no further planned follow-up for the subjects.

1. The investigators will compare the ability of dynamic changes in inferior vena caval diameter (IVC-CI), dynamic changes in peripheral arterial waveform derived variables (PA Doppler), and dynamic changes in left ventricular outflow tract waveform derived variables (LVOT Doppler) to detect fluid responsiveness (FRes) relative to FRes as assessed by bioreactance cardiac output monitoring before and after passive leg raise (PLR).

Hypothesis: PA Doppler and LVOT Doppler will have superior sensitivity and specificity to predict FRes in comparison to IVC-CI.
2. The investigators will evaluate data acquisition duration and data acquisition failure rate of IVC-CI, PA Doppler, and LVOT Doppler. Hypothesis: PA Doppler will have shorter data acquisition durations in comparison to LVOT velocity variation and IVC-CI.

Hypothesis: PA Doppler will have lower data acquisition failure rates in comparison to LVOT velocity variation and IVC-CI.
3. The investigators will compare the ability of IVC-CI, PA Doppler, and LVOT Doppler to predict FRes in comparison to FRes as predicted by clinical judgment.

Hypothesis: PA Doppler and LVOT Doppler will have superior sensitivity and specificity to predict FRes in comparison to clinical judgment.
4. The investigators will evaluate the ability of dynamic changes in PA corrected flow times (cFT) to detect FRes relative to FRes as assessed by bioreactance cardiac output monitoring before and after PLR. Hypothesis: cFT will have greatest sensitivity and specificity to predict FRes at a Δflow time threshold of ≥15% after PLR.

Hypothesis: At a Δflow time threshold of ≥15%, cFT will have superior sensitivity and specificity to detect FRes in comparison to IVC-CI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis Fluid Overload Hypovolemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound and NICOM

All patients enrolled will have all three ultrasound-based modalities for fluid responsiveness performed, as well as have NICOM data to serve as the comparison standard.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects presenting to the ED will be screened in accordance with the Olive View Medical Center Sepsis Waiver, and subjects meeting two of the following four criteria will be eligible for inclusion in the study: Temperature \>38/100.4 or \<36/96.8, heart rate \>90, respiratory rate \>20 or PaCO2\<32, and WBC \>12K or \<4K or \> 10% bands (neutrophils). The clinical team will be contacted regarding patients identified based on this initial screening, and if the patient is determined to have a suspected infection and a fluid bolus is planned, the patient will be enrolled in the study if they meet the following criteria:
* Adult between the age of 18 to 90 years old;
* Not pregnant;
* Not using non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or BiPAP);
* No history of heart, lung, and/or liver transplant;
* Not determined by the clinical team to be acutely unstable requiring immediate intervention at the time of data collection, and;
* No contraindications to a passive leg raise test (known or suspected cranio-cerebral or C-spine injury, venous thrombosis, orthopedic injury requiring immobilization or traction, or other contraindications as per clinical team).

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant;
* Using non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or BiPAP);
* Presence of or suspected elevated intracranial pressure;
* Presence of central venous catheters or other medical devices that prevent the use of bedside ultrasound;
* History of heart, lung, and/or liver transplant;
* History of critical aortic stenosis or severe aortic insufficiency;
* Determined by the clinical team to be acutely unstable and requiring immediate intervention at the time of study enrollment or data collection or;
* Has a contraindication to passive leg raise maneuver, e.g. known cervical spinal injury, deep venous thrombosis, orthopedic injury requiring immobilization or traction.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Olive View-UCLA Education & Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alan Chiem, M.D.

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alan Chiem, MD MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Olive View-UCA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Olive View-UCLA

Sylmar, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB #14H-136004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

VExUS-guided Fluid Management in the ICU
NCT07291778 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA