Fluid Responsiveness Prediction at the Bedside

NCT ID: NCT00721604

Last Updated: 2009-08-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-07-31

Study Completion Date

2009-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to verify the accuracy and applicability of predictors of fluid administration efficacy in hypotensive critically ill patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Severe hypotension is a common life-threatening conditions in critically ill patients. Discriminating between the need for volume expansion or inotropic/vasoactive support is a main clinical goal. Pulse pressure variation are an accurate index of fluid responsiveness, but it needs controlled mechanical ventilation with a tidal volume of at least 8 ml/kg and absence of arrhythmias. This could limit its clinical applicability. Moreover pulse pressure variation accurately predicted cardiac output increment. However the cardiac output increase is not a clinically relevant target in absence of low cardiac output.

The objectives of the present protocol are: 1) to calculate the accuracy of cardiovascular and renal variables to predict either arterial pressure increase or clinically relevant improvement after fluid administration and 2) to verify how often dynamic indices could be applied in clinical practice.

Arterial pressure increase is defined by mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg or an increment greater than 20 % respect to basal value. Clinically relevant improvement is defined by restoring adequate values of arterial pressure or cardiac index or diuresis or central venous saturation if they are inadequate before fluid administration. These adequate values are 65 mmHg for mean arterial pressure, 2.5 l.min-1.m-2 for cardiac index, 0.5 ml.kg-1.h-1 for the diuresis, 70 % for central venous saturation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypotension Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

patients with mean arterial pressure lower than 65 mmHg

fluid administration

Intervention Type DRUG

two consecutive infusions of 6% hydroxyethyl starch at the dosage 7 ml/kg over 30 minutes (total 14 ml/kg in 60 minutes)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

fluid administration

two consecutive infusions of 6% hydroxyethyl starch at the dosage 7 ml/kg over 30 minutes (total 14 ml/kg in 60 minutes)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Haes Steril, Fresenius Kabi

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* mean arterial pressure lower than 65 mmHg

Exclusion Criteria

* fluid overload
* mean arterial pressure lower than 45 mmHg and mandatory immediate treatment
* active bleeding
* hemoglobin lower than 8 g.dl-1
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

FPoliambulanza

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Giuseppe Natalini, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Natalini G, Rosano A, Militano CR, Di Maio A, Ferretti P, Bertelli M, de Giuli F, Bernardini A. Prediction of arterial pressure increase after fluid challenge. BMC Anesthesiol. 2012 Mar 5;12:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-12-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22390818 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FP-TIP-03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Capnogram and Fluid Responsiveness
NCT03788707 WITHDRAWN NA