Hemodynamic Optimization By Non-Invasive Determination Of Cardiac Output In Critically Ill Patients
NCT ID: NCT01309724
Last Updated: 2011-03-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
92 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-01-31
2010-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fluid Responsiveness Prediction at the Bedside
NCT00721604
Fluid Balance in the ICU - Interventions to Minimize Fluids in Patients With Septic Shock
NCT02473718
Timing and Dose of Fluid Deresuscitation in Critically Ill Patients
NCT07275658
Response of Pulse Pressure Variation in PA Catheter Tracing to IV Fluid Bolus in the ICU
NCT02419404
Effects of Induced Moderate Hypothermia on ARDS Patients Under Venovenous ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
NCT05306392
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A cornerstone of hemodynamic resuscitation is volume administration. The goal of volume administration is to maximize cardiac output, and thereby systemic oxygen delivery, by optimizing cardiac preload. Bedside clinical assessment is inadequate for judging whether or not this goal has been achieved. Invasive techniques, such as central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring and pulmonary artery catheterization, carry risks, are costly and time-consuming, and may yield misleading data. Doppler ultrasound-based technology has been developed that allows for instantaneous, non-invasive monitoring of key hemodynamic parameters, such as cardiac output. This technology may facilitate determining the etiology of hemodynamic disturbances and assist the clinician in optimizing therapy based on changes in hemodynamic parameters. This randomized, controlled trial was designed to determine the impact of a volume resuscitation protocol, guided by non-invasive Doppler ultrasound technology, on outcomes in medical ICU patients with vasopressor-dependent hypotension.
Materials and methods:
Patient Population:
Study participants were recruited between January 19, 2010 and December 26, 2010 from two medical ICUs at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, a 1252-bed urban teaching hospital. The Washington University School of Medicine Human Research Protection Office approved the study, and informed consent was obtained from participants or their authorized representatives. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years; administration of vasopressors, defined as a continuous infusion of norepinephrine at a dose \>5 mcg/min, dopamine ≥5 mcg/kg/min or any dose of another vasopressor; and passage of \<18 hours since initiation of vasopressors at doses specified above. Exclusion criteria were hemorrhagic shock, need for immediate surgery, imminent risk of death in the next 48 hours (as judged by the attending ICU physician), level of care decision that precluded implementation of the study protocol, enrollment in any other clinical study, and pregnancy.
Study Protocol:
Subjects were assigned to treatment groups using blocked randomization to receive either volume resuscitation guided by the ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM; USCOM Ltd., Sydney, Australia) or observation. The USCOM is a non-invasive device that uses continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound measurements of blood flow in the ascending aorta or pulmonary artery to estimate stroke volume (SV). Prior to the beginning of the study, one of the study investigators (LMD) underwent a supervised training period with the USCOM in 50 patients to insure reproducibility of the obtained measurements. Subjects randomized to the intervention group underwent a baseline USCOM measurement of SV by a single operator (LMD), followed by a pressurized infusion of 1 L of normal saline (NS) over approximately 15 minutes, after which the SV measurement was repeated. If the SV increased by ≥15%, the patient was deemed volume-responsive, and another 1 L NS bolus was administered. This process was repeated until the SV did not increase by ≥15%, two hours had elapsed since study enrollment, or 4 L of NS had been infused, whichever occurred first. With the exception of initial fluid management in the intervention group, as described above, use of all diagnostic and treatment modalities were at the discretion of the ICU physicians. Subjects in the control group underwent no intervention; ongoing care was carried out at the discretion of the ICU physicians. ICU physicians were unaware of subjects' group assignments and the USCOM data acquired in the intervention group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
No measurements are made on the control group.
No interventions assigned to this group
USCOM
Patients undergo hemodynamic measurements with the ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM). Fluid resuscitation is guided by USCOM measurements.
USCOM-guided fluid administration
Patients in the intervention group underwent hemodynamic measurements with the ultrasound cardiac output monitor. Based on these measurements, patients were guided through a fluid resuscitation protocol.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
USCOM-guided fluid administration
Patients in the intervention group underwent hemodynamic measurements with the ultrasound cardiac output monitor. Based on these measurements, patients were guided through a fluid resuscitation protocol.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Administration of vasopressors, defined as a continuous infusion of norepinephrine at a dose \>5 mcg/min, dopamine ≥5 mcg/kg/min or any dose of another vasopressor
* Passage of \<18 hours since initiation of vasopressors at doses specified above
Exclusion Criteria
* Need for immediate surgery
* Imminent risk of death in the next 48 hours (as judged by the attending ICU physician)
* Level of care decision that precluded implementation of the study protocol
* Enrollment in any other clinical study
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Barnes-Jewish Hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lee M Demertzis, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Barnes-Jewish Hospital
Marin H Kollef, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Warren Isakow, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Barnes-Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
09-1074
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.