Peripheral Perfusion Targeted Fluid Management

NCT ID: NCT01397474

Last Updated: 2014-01-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

* Impaired peripheral perfusion is related to worse outcome in critically ill patients. Although this is known, these parameters have never been used as target for hemodynamic therapy.
* We hypothesize that targeting of fluid administration on parameters of peripheral perfusion might prevent excessive fluid administration, leading to less formation of tissue edema, less respiratory dysfunction and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: Currently, fluid administration of critically ill patients is aimed at optimizing conventional hemodynamic parameters such as stroke volume and cardiac output. Fluid is infused repeatedly until patients become "non-responsive", i.e. cardiac output does not increase anymore. However, the ultimate goal of hemodynamic therapy should be to improve peripheral (i.e. tissue) perfusion. Recently we have shown that 1) increasing stroke volume does not always have an effect on peripheral perfusion and 2) that peripheral perfusion is not impaired when stroke volume can still be increased with fluid infusion. Furthermore, repeated administration of fluid in order to reach a maximum cardiac output can lead to an enormous accumulation of fluid in the patient. This leads to formation of lung edema and respiratory dysfunction and is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and ICU-stay. Recently, techniques have been developed which allow bedside assessment of peripheral perfusion. Although impaired peripheral perfusion was related to worse outcome, these parameters have never been used as target for hemodynamic therapy.

Objective: To study whether peripheral perfusion targeted fluid management (PPTFM) leads to less fluid administration, improved respiratory function and shorter mechanical ventilation.

Study design: The study is a pilot study and is designed as a randomized controlled trial. The study will be conducted as a single-center study at the Intensive Care of the Erasmus Medical Center.

Study population: We aim to include 40 adult patients who are admitted to the Intensive Care with hemodynamic instability (defined as mean arterial pressure \< 65 mmHg and an arterial lactate concentration \> 3.0 mmol/l) due to severe sepsis and septic shock.

Intervention: In the intervention group fluid management is targeted on peripheral perfusion parameters while in the control group fluid is administered in order to optimize cardiac output.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study endpoints are daily fluid balance and duration of mechanical ventilation.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: There is a possible risk that in the treatment group the patients will remain hypovolemic. To ensure that this will not occur, fluids will be administrated in this group, irrespective of peripheral perfusion parameters, until cardiac index is 2,5 L/min/m2. Assessment of peripheral perfusion is performed with non-invasive optical techniques that impose no burden to the patient.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis Severe Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

The fluid management algorithm of the control group is based on the standard care procedure of our ICU as recommended in guidelines: the patient's fluid status is assessed by performing a fluid challenge with a bolus of 250 ml colloids. When the patients is fluid responsive (i.e. showing an increase in stroke volume \> 10% ) he will receive an additional bolus of 250 ml of colloids. After each fluid challenge, patients will be revaluated for fluid responsiveness to access need of further fluid administration.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

PPTFM

The fluid management algorithm of the intervention group uses identical therapy (i.e. fluids) yet targeted at different endpoints (i.e. peripheral perfusion parameters). After evaluation of peripheral perfusion, only patients with a "bad peripheral perfusion" (i.e. 3 out of 4 criteria considered as bad) will receive a fluid challenge, the same way as in the standard care procedure (i.e. bolus of 250 ml of fluid). After each fluid challenge, patients will be re-evaluated for peripheral perfusion to access further need in fluid challenges. To ensure that no hypovolemia will occur in the intervention group, fluid will be administered irrespectively of peripheral perfusion parameters, if cardiac index falls below a value of 2,5 L/min/m2.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PPTFM

Intervention Type OTHER

Peripheral Perfusion Targeted Fluid Management

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PPTFM

Peripheral Perfusion Targeted Fluid Management

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CRT PFI delta Temp StO2

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All adult patients (\>18 years) admitted to the intensive care with 1) hemodynamic instability due to severe sepsis, and 2) a mean arterial pressure \< 65 mmHg and 3) an arterial lactate concentration \> 3.0 mmol/L will be considered for participation

Exclusion Criteria

* moribund.
* severe coagulation disorder (contraindication for central venous catheter placement).
* severe peripheral vascular disease (interfering with peripheral perfusion measurement).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

ME van Genderen

Drs

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jasper van Bommel, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Erasmus Medical Center

Michel E Genderen, Drs

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasmus Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ErasmusMC

Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

ErasmusMC

Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jasper Bommel, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

003110704 0704

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jasper van Bommel, MD,PhD

Role: primary

0031107040704

Jasper v Bommel, MD,PhD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lima A, Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Ince C, Bakker J. The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):934-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819869db.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19237899 (View on PubMed)

Lima A, van Bommel J, Sikorska K, van Genderen M, Klijn E, Lesaffre E, Ince C, Bakker J. The relation of near-infrared spectroscopy with changes in peripheral circulation in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1649-54. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182186675.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21685739 (View on PubMed)

van Genderen ME, Engels N, van der Valk RJ, Lima A, Klijn E, Bakker J, van Bommel J. Early peripheral perfusion-guided fluid therapy in patients with septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb 15;191(4):477-80. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201408-1575LE. No abstract available.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25679107 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL34607.078.10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Efficient PICU Fluid Care Evaluation
NCT06644508 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA