Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-10-31
2014-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* We hypothesize that targeting of fluid administration on parameters of peripheral perfusion might prevent excessive fluid administration, leading to less formation of tissue edema, less respiratory dysfunction and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Time Course Evolution of Cardiac Output
NCT03694717
Hemodynamic Optimization By Non-Invasive Determination Of Cardiac Output In Critically Ill Patients
NCT01309724
Timing and Dose of Fluid Deresuscitation in Critically Ill Patients
NCT07275658
Proactive Prescription-based Fluid Management vs Usual Care in Critically Ill Patients on Kidney Replacement Therapy
NCT05473143
Fluid Shifts in Patients Treated With Therapeutic Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest
NCT00347477
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: To study whether peripheral perfusion targeted fluid management (PPTFM) leads to less fluid administration, improved respiratory function and shorter mechanical ventilation.
Study design: The study is a pilot study and is designed as a randomized controlled trial. The study will be conducted as a single-center study at the Intensive Care of the Erasmus Medical Center.
Study population: We aim to include 40 adult patients who are admitted to the Intensive Care with hemodynamic instability (defined as mean arterial pressure \< 65 mmHg and an arterial lactate concentration \> 3.0 mmol/l) due to severe sepsis and septic shock.
Intervention: In the intervention group fluid management is targeted on peripheral perfusion parameters while in the control group fluid is administered in order to optimize cardiac output.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study endpoints are daily fluid balance and duration of mechanical ventilation.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: There is a possible risk that in the treatment group the patients will remain hypovolemic. To ensure that this will not occur, fluids will be administrated in this group, irrespective of peripheral perfusion parameters, until cardiac index is 2,5 L/min/m2. Assessment of peripheral perfusion is performed with non-invasive optical techniques that impose no burden to the patient.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
The fluid management algorithm of the control group is based on the standard care procedure of our ICU as recommended in guidelines: the patient's fluid status is assessed by performing a fluid challenge with a bolus of 250 ml colloids. When the patients is fluid responsive (i.e. showing an increase in stroke volume \> 10% ) he will receive an additional bolus of 250 ml of colloids. After each fluid challenge, patients will be revaluated for fluid responsiveness to access need of further fluid administration.
No interventions assigned to this group
PPTFM
The fluid management algorithm of the intervention group uses identical therapy (i.e. fluids) yet targeted at different endpoints (i.e. peripheral perfusion parameters). After evaluation of peripheral perfusion, only patients with a "bad peripheral perfusion" (i.e. 3 out of 4 criteria considered as bad) will receive a fluid challenge, the same way as in the standard care procedure (i.e. bolus of 250 ml of fluid). After each fluid challenge, patients will be re-evaluated for peripheral perfusion to access further need in fluid challenges. To ensure that no hypovolemia will occur in the intervention group, fluid will be administered irrespectively of peripheral perfusion parameters, if cardiac index falls below a value of 2,5 L/min/m2.
PPTFM
Peripheral Perfusion Targeted Fluid Management
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PPTFM
Peripheral Perfusion Targeted Fluid Management
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* severe coagulation disorder (contraindication for central venous catheter placement).
* severe peripheral vascular disease (interfering with peripheral perfusion measurement).
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
ME van Genderen
Drs
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jasper van Bommel, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Erasmus Medical Center
Michel E Genderen, Drs
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Erasmus Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ErasmusMC
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
ErasmusMC
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lima A, Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Ince C, Bakker J. The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):934-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819869db.
Lima A, van Bommel J, Sikorska K, van Genderen M, Klijn E, Lesaffre E, Ince C, Bakker J. The relation of near-infrared spectroscopy with changes in peripheral circulation in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1649-54. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182186675.
van Genderen ME, Engels N, van der Valk RJ, Lima A, Klijn E, Bakker J, van Bommel J. Early peripheral perfusion-guided fluid therapy in patients with septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb 15;191(4):477-80. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201408-1575LE. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL34607.078.10
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.