Evaluating Fluid Responsiveness in ICU Patients Using VTI and Trendelenburg Positioning

NCT ID: NCT06418022

Last Updated: 2024-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-01

Study Completion Date

2025-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Fluid administration is a commonly performed in the ICU for critically ill patients. However, it can lead to complications such as fluid overload, pulmonary edema, and increased mortality in some patients. Therefore, identifying patients who are likely to respond to fluid therapy is crucial for optimizing their management. Several methods have been used to assess fluid responsiveness, such as passive leg raising, stroke volume variation, and cardiac output monitoring. However, these methods have limitations and may not be feasible in all patients. In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the use of velocity time integral (VTI) and Trendelenburg positioning in predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators will perform an echocardiogram both in the supine and Trendelenburg positions for research purposes prior to the ICU team assessing fluid responsiveness (see paragraph below).

Critically ill patients in which fluid responsiveness is unclear typically admitted to the ICU routinely undergo a bedside echocardiogram in the supine position and then another echocardiogram still in the supine position after receiving IV fluids to assess the patient's fluid responsiveness (i.e., whether giving a small IV fluid bolus increases cardiac output). VTI is an echocardiographic surrogate for cardiac output and is routinely used in the ICU setting in addition to providing additional information on whether a patient is fluid responsive. This method is already standard practice in the medical and surgical ICU in our PCCM department.

Unfortunately, administering IV fluids can potentially cause adverse events such as pulmonary edema, heart failure, interstitial edema, respiratory failure, and death. The use of a method, such as the passive leg raise maneuver (i.e., raising patient's legs by 30 degrees for 1 minute and then evaluating hemodynamic measurements), help predict whether a patient would benefit from IV fluids prior to giving them fluids in order to prevent these aforementioned adverse events since it is a reversible process. Literature and current practice support the use of the passive leg raise (PLR) maneuver in predicting fluid responsiveness, where an increase of at least 15% signifies a positive fluid response. Similar to IV fluids, the PLR maneuver can cause adverse events, is cumbersome, and not feasible in certain circumstances. There is recent research which suggests that Trendelenburg positioning (TP) can be used as an alternative approach that is potentially safer and less cumbersome. This study aims to evaluate a cutoff increase in VTI that would be accurate in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing TP. As stated above, in our study we will see if placing the patient in TP (i.e., tilt head of the bed 15 degrees downward) will predict if the patient is fluid responsive. The investigators want use ROC analysis to determine the cutoff VTI increase and the accuracy of using TP in predicting fluid responsiveness. The gold standard is to check VTI prior to and after administering an IV fluid bolus and the current literature demonstrates that a VTI increase by 15% is indicative of an appropriate fluid response.

The patients in the study in the ICU will receive IV fluids regardless of our study based on the clinician's discretion (i.e., our study will not affect the decision of the clinician in any way). The bedside echocardiogram takes less than 2 minutes to perform and will not delay care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shock Fluid Overload Cardiac Output, Low

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

This is a single-center, minimal risk study that will include a total of 400 critically ill patients, aged 18 and older, that require fluid administration.

In prior studies, fluid responsiveness has been shown after an IV fluid bolus with ≥15% increase in VTI or after a passive leg raise (PLR) with ≥ 15% increase in VTI. Similar to the other maneuvers such as the PLR maneuver, we hope to find an optimal cutoff in the increase in VTI after Trendelenburg positioning based on ROC analysis, with an increase of VTI \>15% in patients after receiving IV fluids as the gold standard. There will be no intervention arm and patients will serve as their own control.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fluid challenge (control)

This study is evaluating the potential of Trendelenburg positioning (TP) in determining fluid responsiveness by using the change in velocity time integral (VTI), and echocardiographic parameter that can be used as a surrogate for stroke volume and cardiac output.

There are essentially two arms, whereby the patients is being compared to themselves.

The "control arm" is the patient receiving a fluid challenge (FC; IV fluid bolus of 500cc crystalloids- either 0.9% Normal Saline or Lactated Ringer's solution) that the clinician would have given regardless of the study; the change of VTI is collected after administration of IV fluids with comparison to the baseline supine position.

The "intervention arm" is the same patient undergoing TP from the baseline supine position to determine the change in VTI after subjecting to TP.

Group Type OTHER

Trendelenburg positioning VTI

Intervention Type DEVICE

There are essentially two arms, whereby the patients is being compared to themselves. The "intervention arm" is the same patient undergoing TP from the baseline supine position to determine the change in VTI after subjecting to TP.

We will be using a Sonosite PX ultrasound system, which is intended for diagnostic ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body and, more specifically, for our echocardiographic measurements of velocity time integral (VTI; surrogate for stroke volume and cardiac output). The Sonosite PX is a general-purpose ultrasound system intended for use by qualified physicians and healthcare professionals, for evaluation by ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body. This is an FDA-cleared (510K# K200964) commercial device legally marketed in the United States that is being used in accordance with labeling.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trendelenburg positioning VTI

There are essentially two arms, whereby the patients is being compared to themselves. The "intervention arm" is the same patient undergoing TP from the baseline supine position to determine the change in VTI after subjecting to TP.

We will be using a Sonosite PX ultrasound system, which is intended for diagnostic ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body and, more specifically, for our echocardiographic measurements of velocity time integral (VTI; surrogate for stroke volume and cardiac output). The Sonosite PX is a general-purpose ultrasound system intended for use by qualified physicians and healthcare professionals, for evaluation by ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body. This is an FDA-cleared (510K# K200964) commercial device legally marketed in the United States that is being used in accordance with labeling.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) admitted to the medical or surgical ICU.
* Patients who require fluid administration for suspicion of hypovolemia or indicated for volume expansion due to any one of the following: hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 90 mm Hg or mean arterial pressure \< 65 mm Hg), tachycardia (heart rate \> 100 beats per min), blood lactate \> 2.0 mmol/L, skin mottling, oliguria (urine output \< 30 ml/hr), or requiring vasopressor/inotrope support.
* Patients who are able to tolerate the Trendelenburg position.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy.
* Prisoners and institutionalized patients.
* Patients who are not able to tolerate the Trendelenburg position. This includes patients with increased intra-cranial hypertension, intra-abdominal hypertension and gastric retention which places a risk for stomach fluid aspiration.
* Unsatisfactory cardiac echogenicity (an inability to correctly align the Doppler beam to generate reliable VTI measurements at the left ventricular outflow tract \[LVOT\]).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lenox Hill Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Matthew Kheir

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthew Kheir, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lenox Hill Hospital- Northwell Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lenox Hill Hospital- Northwell Health

New York, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Matthew Kheir, MD

Role: CONTACT

516-465-1910

Sara Velichkovikj, BS

Role: CONTACT

212-434-4087

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Matthew Kheir, MD

Role: primary

212-434-4087

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

23-0441

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Efficient PICU Fluid Care Evaluation
NCT06644508 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Non-invasive Fluid Management
NCT02892799 UNKNOWN NA