Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-11-12
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hemodynamic Optimization By Non-Invasive Determination Of Cardiac Output In Critically Ill Patients
NCT01309724
Comparison of Non-Invasive Methods of Assessing Fluid Responsiveness in ED and ICU Patients
NCT02679625
Fluid Responsiveness Evaluation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension
NCT02837731
Fluid Responsiveness Prediction During Prone Position
NCT05898269
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Fluid Responsiveness in Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO) - "HemodynamECMOnitoring-VV Study"
NCT06593717
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Negative fluid balance in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been shown to improve intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and ventilator-free days. Although protocols exist for fluid management, all require invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Despite the large evidence base supporting the use of invasive monitoring, the majority of ARDS patients are now managed without invasive central lines. A non-invasive protocol for managing fluid status in patients with ARDS has not been rigorously implemented nor studied within a randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE:
The study objective is to compare a novel non-invasive parameter-guided protocol for fluid management to usual care. The specific aims are: 1) to compare the incidence of new or worsening renal failure, the incidence of new or worsening shock, and the incidence of new or worsening non-shock hypotension; 2) to compare the relative effectiveness of the 2 treatment groups as assessed by cumulative fluid balance over 7 days; 3) to determine if the non-invasive protocol increases the number of ventilator-free days and ICU-free days; and further, to evaluate if it decreases 60-day mortality; and 4) to document the clinical instances where treatment digression between the 2 groups occurs.
STUDY DESIGN:
This study is a single-blinded, randomized control trial, comparing 1 treatment arm to usual care. We will treat patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure (including ARDS) for 7 consecutive days. Their post-study course will be monitored for a period of 60 days or until death. Patients who are randomized to the intervention group will receive fluid management strategies that are dictated by non-invasively derived (via the "NICOM" device) surrogates of cardiac preload and output. Patients who are randomized to the control group will receive standard-of-care "best practice" fluid management, as dictated by the treating physician.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard of Care
Patients randomized to the usual care arm will be treated almost the same as if they do not enroll in the study. They will be managed in accordance with best ICU (intensive care unit) practices, with treatment decisions made by the treating team. Often this will include blood draws (often 2 teaspoons once or twice per day, but sometimes exceeding this), assessments of cardiac function, assessments of fluid status, and other measures as dictated by the presenting illness (this is broad and will include antibiotics, diuretics, cardiac medications, ventilator and oxygen management, etc.). Patients in the usual care arm will not have diuresis managed by NICOM.
Standard of Care
NICOM-Guided Diuresis
Within 4 hours, patients will have their blood pressure obtained, a NICOM-based assessment of PLR (passive leg raise)-induced change in cardiac index, hourly urinary output, and quantization of the total input and output from the beginning of the morning shift (7 am). This will allow determination of the fluid goal over the next 4 hours. Patients will receive furosemide to achieve the goal fluid balance, if needed as described in the accompanying protocol. Monitoring of electrolytes and renal function will be at the discretion of the treating physician.
Following the initial evaluation, at set times spaced every 4 hours apart, patients will have an ongoing evaluation of the day's fluid balance, hourly urinary output, and PLR/NICOM values. This diuresis protocol will continue for a total of seven 24-hour periods or until the primary means of oxygenation/ventilation has been withdrawn, whichever occurs first. Patients will be followed for a total of 60 days to evaluate outcome data.
NICOM-Guided Diuresis
NICOM-based assessment of PLR-induced change in cardiac index
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NICOM-Guided Diuresis
NICOM-based assessment of PLR-induced change in cardiac index
Standard of Care
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute respiratory failure (must meet ONE of the following)
* Receipt of mechanical ventilation
* Receipt of non-invasive ventilation via BIPAP or CPAP, used for an indication other than sleep apnea
* Receipt of high flow nasal cannula oxygenation with FiO2 \> .4 and a flow rate \> 30 LPM
* Increased total body fluid volume (any of the following)
* \> 1 kg increased weight gain (compared to admission)
* \> 1 L positive fluid balance (compared to admission)
* Bedside clinician determination
Exclusion Criteria
* Dialysis dependence, at the time of enrollment
* Chronic ventilator dependence, prior to admission
* Intubation for airway protection (solely for a surgical procedure) or upper airway obstruction
* Neuromuscular disease that impairs the ability to ventilate spontaneously, such as C5 or higher spinal cord injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, and myasthenia gravis
* Solid organ transplantation or bone marrow transplantation
* Vasculitis with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage
* Severe chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh Score 10-15)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Lanspa
Adjunct Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Lanspa, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Intermountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Michael Lanspa, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1050087
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.