The Effect pf Goal-directed De-escalation in ARDS on Organ Function and Mortality

NCT ID: NCT04508296

Last Updated: 2024-03-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-10

Study Completion Date

2020-12-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective: To compare two de-escalation strategies guided by either extravascular lung water or global end-diastolic volume-oriented algorithms in patients with sepsis and ARDS.

Design: A prospective randomized study. Setting: City Hospital #1 of Arkhangelsk, Russia, mixed ICU. Patients: Sixty patients with sepsis and ARDS were randomized to receive de-escalation fluid therapy, guided either by extravascular lung water index (EVLWI, n = 30) or global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI, n = 30).

Intervention: In case of GEDVI \> 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI \> 10 mL/kg, diuretics and/or controlled ultrafiltration were administered. The primary goal of de-escalation was to achieve the cumulative 48-hr fluid balance in the range of 0 to - 3000 mL. If GEDVI \< 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI \< 10 mL/kg, the target fluid balance was set from 0 to +3000 mL.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In all patients, investigators catheterized the internal jugular or the subclavian vein with a triple-lumen central venous catheter (Certofix, B\|Braun, Germany) and the femoral artery with a thermistor-tipped arterial catheter (5F, PV2015L20, Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany). The arterial blood pressure was recorded from a side port of the catheter. Hemodynamic monitoring was carried out using the method of transpulmonary thermodilution (PiCCO2 monitor, Pulsion Medical Systems, Germany) by a triplicate 15 mL bolus of cold (\< 8 °C) 0.9% saline solution.

Mechanical ventilation (Puritan Bennett 840 and 980, Medtronic, USA) was performed according to the ARDS Network protocol, using pressure-controlled ventilation with tidal volume 6-7 ml/kg of predicted body weight, with a Ppeak not exceeding 35 cm H2O, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and a fraction of inspiratory oxygen (FiO2) levels adjusted to maintain SpO2 within a 92-97% range.

The target fluid balance was achieved by continuous infusion of furosemide with an initial dose of 0.07 mcg/kg/hr and a minimal duration of 12 hrs. In case of failure to reach a negative fluid balance by means of diuretics, started controlled ultrafiltration using continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH, multiFiltrate, Fresenius Medical Care, Germany). For fluid replacement, if necessary, investigators administered balanced crystalloid solutions (Sterofundin Iso/G5, B\|Braun, Germany) with an initial infusion rate of 6-7 ml/kg/hr.

Heart rate (HR), MAP, cardiac index (CI), GEDVI, EVLWI, pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI), central venous pressure (CVP), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), pulse pressure variation (PPV), and stroke volume variation (SVV) were assessed using transpulmonary thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis. During the study, investigators also assessed blood gases (ABL Flex 800 Radiometer, Denmark) and biochemical parameters (Random Access A-25, BioSystems, Spain). All measurements were performed at baseline, at 24 and at 48 hrs of the goal-directed de-escalation

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

ARDS, Human Sepsis, Severe

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GEDVI-oriented de-escalation

Patients received de-escalation fluid management using either diuretics or ultrafiltration during continuous RRT. In the case of GEDVI \> 650 mL/m2 the primary goal of de-escalation is to obtain a cumulative fluid balance after 48 hrs from the study baseline of 0 to -3000 mL. In the case of GEDVI \< 650 mL/m2 he target fluid balance is in the range of 0 to +3000 mL

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Goal directed de-escalation therapy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patients received de-escalation fluid management using either diuretics or ultrafiltration during continuous RRT in the case of GEDVI \> 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI \> 10 mL/kg depending on the randomization group. The primary goal of de-escalation was to obtain a cumulative fluid balance after 48 hrs from the study baseline of 0 to -3000 mL. In the case of GEDVI \< 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI \< 10 mL/kg, the target fluid balance was in the range of 0 to +3000 mL

EVLWI-oriented de-escalation

Patients received de-escalation fluid management using either diuretics or ultrafiltration during continuous RRT. In the case of EVLWI \> 10 mL/kg the primary goal of de-escalation is to obtain a cumulative fluid balance after 48 hrs from the study baseline of 0 to -3000 mL. In the case of EVLWI \< 10 mL/kg, the target fluid balance is in the range of 0 to +3000 mL

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Goal directed de-escalation therapy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patients received de-escalation fluid management using either diuretics or ultrafiltration during continuous RRT in the case of GEDVI \> 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI \> 10 mL/kg depending on the randomization group. The primary goal of de-escalation was to obtain a cumulative fluid balance after 48 hrs from the study baseline of 0 to -3000 mL. In the case of GEDVI \< 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI \< 10 mL/kg, the target fluid balance was in the range of 0 to +3000 mL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Goal directed de-escalation therapy

Patients received de-escalation fluid management using either diuretics or ultrafiltration during continuous RRT in the case of GEDVI \> 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI \> 10 mL/kg depending on the randomization group. The primary goal of de-escalation was to obtain a cumulative fluid balance after 48 hrs from the study baseline of 0 to -3000 mL. In the case of GEDVI \< 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI \< 10 mL/kg, the target fluid balance was in the range of 0 to +3000 mL

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The presence of sepsis ( the third international definition of sepsis and septic shock )
* The precence of ARDS (the Berlin definition of ARDS)
* mechanical ventilation before the study for at least 24 hrs
* the age of the patient \> 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria

* continuous infusion of norepinephrine in a dose exceeding 0.4 mcg/kg/min to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 65-75 mm Hg,
* morbid obesity with BMI \> 40 kg/m2,
* severe brain injury,
* chronic kidney diseases,
* pregnancy,
* known irreversible underlying conditions such as end-stage neoplasms.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northern State Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mikhail Y. Kirov

Head of Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

City Hospital # 1 n.a. E.E. Volosevich

Arkhangelsk, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

De-escalation ARDS_2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.