Effect of Fluid Deresuscitation With Central Venous Pressure Target 0-4 mmHg in Septic Shock Patients
NCT ID: NCT04156451
Last Updated: 2025-05-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-14
2020-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hemodynamic Optimization By Non-Invasive Determination Of Cardiac Output In Critically Ill Patients
NCT01309724
The Furosemide Stress Test, Electrolytes Response and Renal Index in Critically Ill Patients
NCT04215419
Timing and Dose of Fluid Deresuscitation in Critically Ill Patients
NCT07275658
Whether a Minimal Volume Could Predict Fluid Responsiveness Using Thermodilution by PAC in Septic Shock Patients
NCT04515511
Impact of Starting Dose of Vasopressor on Hemodynamic Response in Shock
NCT06481839
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study evaluates the difference in capillary perfusion density, AKI stage (based on KDIGO criteria), and the Cardiac index value between groups septic shock patients with CVP 0-4 mmHg on the 7th day after deresuscitation compared with the control group (CVP 8-10 mmHg on the first 7th day after being given deresuscitation).
The study evaluates the difference in the number of intubation incidents, duration of use ventilators, and care in the ICU between groups of patients with septic shock CVP 0 - 4 on day 28 after being given a degree of comparison with a control group (CVP 8-10 mmHg on day 28th after being deresuscitation).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Central Venous Pressure 8 - 10 mmHg
Furosemide deresuscitation or crystalloid loading until the CVP target 8-12 mmHg is reached
Fluid resuscitation and furosemide administration (bolus and continuous) with central venous pressure target 8 - 10 mmHg
Crystalloid loading or furosemide administration with the CVP target 8-10 mmHg is reached in septic shock patients
Central Venous Pressure 0 - 4 mmHg
Furosemide deresuscitation or crystalloid loading until the CVP target 0-4 mmHg is reached
Fluid deresuscitation and furosemide administration (bolus and continuous) with central venous pressure target 0 - 4 mmHg
active fluid removal with furosemide bolus and continuous or crystalloid loading until the CVP target 0-4 mmHg is reached in septic shock patients
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fluid resuscitation and furosemide administration (bolus and continuous) with central venous pressure target 8 - 10 mmHg
Crystalloid loading or furosemide administration with the CVP target 8-10 mmHg is reached in septic shock patients
Fluid deresuscitation and furosemide administration (bolus and continuous) with central venous pressure target 0 - 4 mmHg
active fluid removal with furosemide bolus and continuous or crystalloid loading until the CVP target 0-4 mmHg is reached in septic shock patients
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients, both men and women, in the age range of 18 - 60 years
* Patients who experience post clean operative sepsis
* Patients who agree to attend the study by signing informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Have severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, patients with severe pleural effusion
* Patients who, based on ultrasound examination, found stones or tumors in the kidney during the study period
* CKD patients are based on history taking and physical examination
* DNR (do not resuscitate) patients
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indonesia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dita Aditianingsih
MD, PhD, Anesthesiologist Consultant
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, Gerlach H, Moreno R, Carlet J, Le Gall JR, Payen D; Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients Investigators. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):344-53. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000194725.48928.3a.
Opal SM, Laterre PF, Francois B, LaRosa SP, Angus DC, Mira JP, Wittebole X, Dugernier T, Perrotin D, Tidswell M, Jauregui L, Krell K, Pachl J, Takahashi T, Peckelsen C, Cordasco E, Chang CS, Oeyen S, Aikawa N, Maruyama T, Schein R, Kalil AC, Van Nuffelen M, Lynn M, Rossignol DP, Gogate J, Roberts MB, Wheeler JL, Vincent JL; ACCESS Study Group. Effect of eritoran, an antagonist of MD2-TLR4, on mortality in patients with severe sepsis: the ACCESS randomized trial. JAMA. 2013 Mar 20;309(11):1154-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.2194.
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL; International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee; American Association of Critical-Care Nurses; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Emergency Physicians; Canadian Critical Care Society; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; European Respiratory Society; International Sepsis Forum; Japanese Association for Acute Medicine; Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Hospital Medicine; Surgical Infection Society; World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb SA, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, Kumar A, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Rubenfeld GD, Angus DC, Annane D, Beale RJ, Bellinghan GJ, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith C, De Backer DP, French CJ, Fujishima S, Gerlach H, Hidalgo JL, Hollenberg SM, Jones AE, Karnad DR, Kleinpell RM, Koh Y, Lisboa TC, Machado FR, Marini JJ, Marshall JC, Mazuski JE, McIntyre LA, McLean AS, Mehta S, Moreno RP, Myburgh J, Navalesi P, Nishida O, Osborn TM, Perner A, Plunkett CM, Ranieri M, Schorr CA, Seckel MA, Seymour CW, Shieh L, Shukri KA, Simpson SQ, Singer M, Thompson BT, Townsend SR, Van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Wiersinga WJ, Zimmerman JL, Dellinger RP. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
Prowle JR, Echeverri JE, Ligabo EV, Ronco C, Bellomo R. Fluid balance and acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010 Feb;6(2):107-15. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2009.213. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
Payen D, de Pont AC, Sakr Y, Spies C, Reinhart K, Vincent JL; Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Investigators. A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure. Crit Care. 2008;12(3):R74. doi: 10.1186/cc6916. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
Van Biesen W, Yegenaga I, Vanholder R, Verbeke F, Hoste E, Colardyn F, Lameire N. Relationship between fluid status and its management on acute renal failure (ARF) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis: a prospective analysis. J Nephrol. 2005 Jan-Feb;18(1):54-60.
Wang CH, Hsieh WH, Chou HC, Huang YS, Shen JH, Yeo YH, Chang HE, Chen SC, Lee CC. Liberal versus restricted fluid resuscitation strategies in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies*. Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):954-61. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000050.
Cordemans C, De Laet I, Van Regenmortel N, Schoonheydt K, Dits H, Huber W, Malbrain ML. Fluid management in critically ill patients: the role of extravascular lung water, abdominal hypertension, capillary leak, and fluid balance. Ann Intensive Care. 2012 Jul 5;2(Suppl 1 Diagnosis and management of intra-abdominal hyperten):S1. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-S1-S1. eCollection 2012.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IndonesiaUAnes040
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.