Stop Hypernatremia, Use Metolazone, for Aggressive, Controlled, Effective Diuresis
NCT ID: NCT01617798
Last Updated: 2019-06-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-06-30
2013-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hydrochloorthiazide and Hypernatriaemie
NCT01974739
Non-invasive Fluid Management
NCT02892799
Hypertonic Saline Therapy in Ambulatory Heart Failure Unit.
NCT04533997
Nebulized Furosemide, Heparin, Hypertonic Saline in Mechanically Ventilated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Adult Patients
NCT07286409
Peritoneal Dialysis vs Furosemide for Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiopulmonary Bypass
NCT01709227
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Conduct a randomized, pilot trial of standard versus metolazone supplemented diuresis in ICU patients with the primary outcome of improved negative fluid balance.
2. Assess secondary outcomes including time to extubation, exacerbation of renal failure, and incidence of electrolyte derrangements in the treatment and control arms.
3. Track whether initial hypernatremia within the control group is a risk factor for poor diuresis with furosemide, and whether it delays extubation.
The anticipated benefits of our proposed intervention involve fundamental ICU and patient care quality measures: avoiding the pitfalls of hypernatremia and diuretic resistance should lead to more effective diuresis, which should in turn lead to a more negative fluid balance, earlier liberation from the ventilator, and a shorter length of stay in the ICU.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control-- furosemide (lasix) only
Control arm receives standard of care diuresis with furosemide(lasix)only. The treatment team will decide the dosing of furosemide (lasix).
No actual placebo is administered.
Placebo Comparator: Control-- furosemide (lasix) only
Control arm will receive furosemide as monotherapy for diuresis
Study Arm
Study arm receives evolving standard of care diuresis with furosemide and metolazone.
Supplemental metolazone diuresis
Patients in the Study Arm will receive supplemental diuresis with metolazone 2.5 mg per dobhoff tube twice daily, in addition to furosemide as the primary team sees fit.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Supplemental metolazone diuresis
Patients in the Study Arm will receive supplemental diuresis with metolazone 2.5 mg per dobhoff tube twice daily, in addition to furosemide as the primary team sees fit.
Placebo Comparator: Control-- furosemide (lasix) only
Control arm will receive furosemide as monotherapy for diuresis
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients must be hypernatremic (Na \> 140 mEq/L) at the time diuresis is initiated or become hypernatremic over the course of receiving loop diuretics in anticipation of extubation.
* GFR \> 30 ml/min \[as calculated by the MedCalc MDRD formula {GFR = 170 x PCr - 0.999 x Age - 0.176 x BUN - 0.170 x Albumin0.318 x 0.762 (for women) x 1.180 (for blacks)} \]
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to place enteral access
* Moribund status
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oregon Health and Science University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jeffrey Gold
Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Steiger, JD MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oregon Health and Science University
Dan Hagg, MS MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oregon Health and Science University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Oregon Health Sciences University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00007857
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.