Perioperative Fluid Management in Patients Receiving Major Abdominal Surgery - Effects of Normal Saline Versus an Acetate Buffered Balanced Infusion Solution on the Necessity of Catecholamines for Cardiocirculatory Support

NCT ID: NCT02414555

Last Updated: 2016-05-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-31

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background Intraoperative hypotension is a common problem that significantly contributes to perioperative mortality and morbidity. At the moment the "gold standard" for perioperative fluid management is the so called "goal-directed therapy" that features fluid resuscitation followed if necessary catecholamines if needed for perioperative cardiocirculatory support.

Worldwide the so called "physiological" sodium chlorid (0.9% NaCl) solution is the most often used infusate for perioperative fluid management. Despite its widespread use physiological saline has its major disadvantages such as the increased incidence of metabolic acidosis. Nevertheless catecholamines have their significant side effects as well (eg diminished renal perfusion, increased cardiovascular morbidity) and they therefore should be used with caution.

In a prior study by group members on patients undergoing renal transplantation receiving either physiological saline or an acetate-buffered infusate showed a 50% decrease in catecholamine necessity in the acetate-buffered infusate group. The investigators therefore would like to evaluate the effects of the perioperative fluid choice on the necessity of catecholamine use.

Aim

* Evaluation of the perioperative fluid choice on the necessity of catecholamines for cardiocirculatory support.
* Description of the relationship between perioperative fluid choice and minimal blood pressure as well as the time to catecholamine use and their dosage.

Methods The investigators plan a prospective randomized-controlled trial of all patients undergoing major abdominal surgery at the Vienna General Hospital and Medical University of Vienna. Fluid management and catecholamine use will be based on a oesophageal Doppler -based treatment scheme.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NaCl 0.9% BBraun (normale saline)

154mmol/l sodium, 154mmol/l chloride

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

vasopressor

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients receive oesophageal doppler-based hemodynamic support either with fluid or with vasopressor

fluid bolus

Intervention Type DRUG

oesophagus doppler (CardioQ)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Normal Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

arterial cannulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

intravenous peripheral line insertion (17 gauge)

Intervention Type DEVICE

for fluid bolus administration

Elo-Mel Isoton (balanced acetat-based infusate)

sodium 140mmol/l, potassium 5.0mmol/l, calcium 2.5mmol/l, magnesium 1.5mmol/l, chlorid 108mmol/l, acetate 45mmol/l

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

vasopressor

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients receive oesophageal doppler-based hemodynamic support either with fluid or with vasopressor

fluid bolus

Intervention Type DRUG

oesophagus doppler (CardioQ)

Intervention Type DEVICE

arterial cannulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

intravenous peripheral line insertion (17 gauge)

Intervention Type DEVICE

for fluid bolus administration

Elo-Mel Isoton (balanced acetat-based infusate)

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

vasopressor

Patients receive oesophageal doppler-based hemodynamic support either with fluid or with vasopressor

Intervention Type DRUG

fluid bolus

Intervention Type DRUG

oesophagus doppler (CardioQ)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Normal Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

arterial cannulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

intravenous peripheral line insertion (17 gauge)

for fluid bolus administration

Intervention Type DEVICE

Elo-Mel Isoton (balanced acetat-based infusate)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

phenylephrine, norepinephrine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients scheduled for open elective major abdominal surgery and expected to last a minimum of 2 hours will be included in the study.

(Major abdominal surgery includes all gynecological, urological and general surgical operations requiring laparotomy)

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients younger than 18 years of age
* Patients unable to give informed consent
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Patients transferred form the intensive care unit to the operating theater
* Patients with an already established catecholamine therapy
* Emergency operation
* Chronic inflammatory diseases (chronic inflammatory rheumatoid diseases, chronic inflammatory renal diseases, chronic inflammatory infectious diseases, chronic inflammatory bowel diseases, chronic liver disease with signs of liver insufficiency)
* Severe cardiovascular disease (heart disease with an ejection fraction below 30%, instable coronary syndromes, severe valvular disease)
* Any signs of infection or sepsis
* Any contraindication for oesophageal Doppler monitoring (oesophageal and aortic pathology, planned oesophageal resection)
* Renal insufficiency with a glomerular filtration rate below 30ml/min
* Patients with additional epidural anesthesia are excluded from the study if epidural anesthesia is planned to be used for analgesia intraoperatively
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Vienna

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pfortmueller Carmen Andrea

Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Klaus Markstaller, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Clinic for General Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of General Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Medical University of Vienna

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pfortmueller CA, Funk GC, Reiterer C, Schrott A, Zotti O, Kabon B, Fleischmann E, Lindner G. Normal saline versus a balanced crystalloid for goal-directed perioperative fluid therapy in major abdominal surgery: a double-blind randomised controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;120(2):274-283. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.088. Epub 2017 Dec 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29406176 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

v1.104112014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Goal Directed Fluid Therapy
NCT00860704 COMPLETED PHASE4