Fluid Loading in Abdominal Surgery: Saline Versus Hydroxyethyl Starch (FLASH Study)
NCT ID: NCT02502773
Last Updated: 2019-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
826 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-02-29
2018-10-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hemostasis Evolution During Fluid Loading in Abdominal Surgery. Effects of Fluid Choice: Saline Versus Hydroxyethyl Starch (HAEMO Study)
NCT03420261
Crystalloids Versus Colloids During Surgery
NCT00517127
Safety and Efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) Solution Versus an Electrolyte Solution in Patients Undergoing Elective Abdominal Surgery
NCT03278548
Perioperative Fluid Management in Patients Receiving Major Abdominal Surgery - Effects of Normal Saline Versus an Acetate Buffered Balanced Infusion Solution on the Necessity of Catecholamines for Cardiocirculatory Support
NCT02414555
A Total Balanced Volume Replacement Regimen in Elderly Cardiac Surgery Patients
NCT00576849
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Two recent international multicenter studies (6S and CHEST studies) have shown that, compared to crystalloid solutions, the use of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) could be responsible for higher morbidity, especially renal failure, and mortality in ICU patients, thus leading to a recent restriction of their range of indications.
In contrast, in surgical patients, recent meta-analyses have concluded on the absence of difference in terms of mortality and postoperative renal failure between crystalloids and latest generation HES. Excessive fluid administration during surgery is associated with increased risk of postoperative morbidity, including renal dysfunction and mortality. It has been suggested that, compared with the volume-restoring effects of colloids, crystalloid use may require the administration of higher fluid volumes, which may contribute to poorer outcomes. In the surgical context, clinical trials and meta-analyses have shown that individualized goal-direct fluid administration can reduce postoperative morbidity. Although most GDT studies have used colloid solutions for fluid loading, the effects of the type of fluids are currently unknown and crystalloids are proposed for first-line therapy.
The proposed Flash multicenter study will be conducted to assess if the use of HES or crystalloid solutions during an individualized GDT contribute to outcome differences in patients at moderate-to-high risk of postoperative complications after abdominal surgery. As these fluids are widely used during surgery and because of current concerns about the risks related to the use of HES-based products in ICU patients, the trial will provide important data to clinicians involved in perioperative care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
crystalloid group
The proposed Flash multicenter study will be conducted to assess if the use of HES or crystalloid solutions during an individualized GDT contribute to outcome differences in patients at moderate-to-high risk of postoperative complications after abdominal surgery
Hydroxethyl starch
colloid group
The proposed Flash multicenter study will be conducted to assess if the use of HES or crystalloid solutions during an individualized GDT contribute to outcome differences in patients at moderate-to-high risk of postoperative complications after abdominal surgery
Hydroxethyl starch
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hydroxethyl starch
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Undergo elective or emergency abdominal surgery under general anesthesia
* With an estimated surgical duration greater than or equal to 2 hours
* With moderate-to-high risk of postoperative complications defined by an AKI risk index≥ class 3, as defined by the presence of at least 4 of the following factors: age\> 56 years, male gender, intraperitoneal surgery, active congestive heart failure, ascites, hypertension, emergency surgery, mild or moderate renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus treated by oral or insulin therapy
Exclusion Criteria
* Age \<18 years
* Preoperative acute heart failure
* Preoperative acute coronary insufficiency
* Preoperative severe renal failure (defined by creatinine clearance \<30 ml/min or requiring renal replacement therapy)
* Preoperative shock defined by the need for vasoactive amines
* History of allergy with the use of 6% Hydroxethyl starch 130/0.4
* Contraindication to the use of HES: sepsis, burnt patient, renal insufficiency or dialysis, cerebral hemorrhage, ICU patient , hypervolemia, lung edema, dehydration, severe hypernatremia or severe hyperchloremia, severe hepatic insufficiency, congestive heart failure, severe coagulopathy, organ transplant
* Patient's or relative's refusal to participate
* Parturient or breastfeeding woman
* Protected major (guardianship)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Agence Nationale de sécurité du Médicament
OTHER
Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (AOI N° 2013 _ Futier)
UNKNOWN
Société Française Anesthesie-Réanimation (SFAR)
UNKNOWN
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emmanuel FUTIER
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Jean-Etienne BAZIN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Samir JABER
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Montpellier
Julien POTTECHER
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHRU Strasbourg
Alexandre OUATTARA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Thomas LESCOT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Saint-Antoine (APHP)
Hélène BELOEIL
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU Rennes
Gilles LEBUFFE
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHRU LILLE
Philippe CUVILLON
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU Nîmes
Julien BUREY
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Tenon (APHP)
Willy-Serge MFAM
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CH ORLEANS
Vincent PIRIOU
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Marc LEONE
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AP-HM
Sébastien BERTRAN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU Nîmes
Marion FAUCHER
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Catherine PAUGAM-BURTZ
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hôpital Beaujon
Lionel VELLY
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AP-HM
Olivier HUET
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU Brest
Sigismond LASOCKI
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Angers
Pierre SAINT-LEGER
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CH VALENCIENNES
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Futier E, Garot M, Godet T, Biais M, Verzilli D, Ouattara A, Huet O, Lescot T, Lebuffe G, Dewitte A, Cadic A, Restoux A, Asehnoune K, Paugam-Burtz C, Cuvillon P, Faucher M, Vaisse C, El Amine Y, Beloeil H, Leone M, Noll E, Piriou V, Lasocki S, Bazin JE, Pereira B, Jaber S; FLASH Trial Group; Lasocki S, Huet O, Cadic A, Jacob C, Paugam-Burtz C, Restoux A, Ouattara A, Feitita I, Deloge E, Defaye M, Joannes-Boyau O, Carles P, Napolitano G, Monziols S, Futier E, Vignaud M, Paul S, Gahbiche K, Fayon J, Laroche E, Bazin JE, Brandely A, Le Moal C, Lebuffe G, Garot M, Piriou V, Jaber S, Chanques G, Verzilli D, De Jong A, Millot A, Castagnoli A, Leone M, Pastene B, Castelli C, Medam S, Velly L, Vaisse C, Faucher M, Asehnoune K, Samba E, Roquilly A, Le Penndu M, Cuvillon P, Yves Lefrant J, Wira O, Dubout E, Mfam WS, Lescot T, Begneu E, Burey J, Cirilovic T, Beloeil H, Allo G, Pottecher J, Lebas B, Venot C, Rameau JP, Dimache F, Leger PS, El Amine Y. Effect of Hydroxyethyl Starch vs Saline for Volume Replacement Therapy on Death or Postoperative Complications Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: The FLASH Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Jan 21;323(3):225-236. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20833.
Futier E, Biais M, Godet T, Bernard L, Rolhion C, Bourdier J, Morand D, Pereira B, Jaber S; FLASH trial management committee. Fluid loading in abdominal surgery - saline versus hydroxyethyl starch (FLASH Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Dec 21;16:582. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1085-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014-005575-84
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CHU-0242
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.