Crystalloids or Colloids for Goal-directed Fluid Therapy With Closed-loop Assistance in Major Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02312999

Last Updated: 2018-01-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-24

Study Completion Date

2017-12-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study goal: This study will examine whether there is a significant difference in postoperative outcomes between GDFT using a colloid solution versus a crystalloid solution.

Hypothesis: Perioperative fluid optimization through the use of a closed-loop assistance with a balanced starch solution (volulyte®) will be associated with a decrease in postoperative complications compared to the same approach using a balanced crystalloid solution (Plasmalyte®).

Objective: To establish which kind of intravenous fluid used for goal directed therapy with closed-loop assistance will reduce the number of postoperative complications (evaluation made by the POMS score).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Controversy still persists regarding the type of fluid to use in the operating room to avoid hypovolemia and any circulatory insufficiency. While crystalloids and colloid solutions are frequently used to optimize intravascular volume during surgery, crystalloid solutions require more volume for hemodynamic optimization which may result in higher volumes of fluid administration and potentially side effects. Compared with crystalloids, colloids have the advantages of remaining in the intravascular space longer, achieving faster circulatory stabilization, maintaining colloid osmotic pressure and increasing micro perfusion. However, colloids are more expensive and may have various side effects.

In addition to the effect of crystalloids and colloids on the patient, the amount of each fluid administered is also under debate. Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) strategies based on cardiac output (CO) optimization have been shown to benefit moderate- to high-risk surgery patients and have recently been recommended by professional societies in the UK, in France, and in Europe. However, despite the growing evidence, these strategies are often not implemented in current practice. One of the reasons for this lack of implementation is that GDFT strategies, like any other complex clinical protocol, require significant provider attention and vigilance for consistent implementation and it is well known that even under study conditions protocol compliance rates are often not greater than 50% In another hand, one of the chief complicating factors in fluid administration studies is variation in provider administration practices, even when attempting to follow a protocol. Previous studies have used closed-loop (automated) systems to deliver fluid by a standardized protocol, removing variation between providers as one of the confounders of the study. Dr. Cannesson and Rinehart (UC Irvine, California, USA) have recently developed and used a closed-loop system for the provision of GDFT in clinical studies at UC Irvine and La Pitie hospital in France. The closed-loop system is beneficial because it involves the standardization of fluid management and all patients are treated equivalently. This system will thus provide consistent GDFT for all cases in the protocol and remove inter-provider variability as a confounder between groups.

Study goal: This study will examine whether there is a significant difference in postoperative outcomes between GDFT using a colloid solution versus a crystalloid solution.

Hypothesis: Perioperative fluid optimization through the use of a closed-loop assistance with a balanced starch solution (volulyte®) will be associated with a decrease in postoperative complications compared to the same approach using a balanced crystalloid solution (Plasmalyte®).

Objective: To establish which kind of intravenous fluid used for goal directed therapy with closed-loop assistance will reduce the number of postoperative complications (evaluation made by the POMS score).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Volulyte

A baseline crystalloid infusion (plasmalyte®) will be set by the attending physician at 3 cc/kg/hr (standard patient care) for each of the randomized groups. The patient will receive fluid management via a closed loop (automated) system that will use an infusion pump (Q-Core) and a controller (a computer run index and algorithm developed by Sironis) to standardize the way fluids are administered intra-operatively and eliminate variation between clinical providers. The liquid perfused will be bolus amounts of volulyte.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Volulyte

Intervention Type DRUG

Plasma-Lyte

A baseline crystalloid infusion (plasmalyte®) will be set by the attending physician at 3 cc/kg/hr (standard patient care) for each of the randomized groups. The patient will receive fluid management via a closed loop (automated) system that will use an infusion pump (Q-Core) and a controller (a computer run index and algorithm developed by Sironis) to standardize the way fluids are administered intra-operatively and eliminate variation between clinical providers. The liquid perfused will be bolus amounts of plasma-lyte.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Plasmalyte

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Plasmalyte

Intervention Type DRUG

Volulyte

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (over the age of 18) undergoing elective major abdominal surgery that is expected to take longer than 3 hours and requiring a general anesthesia and a minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring (Vigileo/Flotrac)
* Patients who provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients under 18 years of age
* Patients not undergoing surgery, requiring anesthesia, or cardiac output monitoring
* Patients with arrhythmia and/or atrial fibrillation
* Patients who are allergic to HES
* Patients with renal insufficiency (serum creatinine of \>2 mg/ml) or hepatic dysfunction (liver enzymes \>1.5)
* Patients who has coagulation disorders (please define: values higher than 1.5x normal values
* Patients without the capacity to give written informed consent or refusal of consent
* Patients included in another protocol within a period of 3 months or Participating in another randomised trial
* Pregnancy at time of enrolment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brugmann University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Philippe VAN DER LINDEN

Head of clinic

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amélie Delaporte, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Brugmann

Alexandre Joosten, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasme

Philippe Van der Linden, MD, Pr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Brugmann

Brigitte Ickx, Md, Pr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasme

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Brugmann

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Erasme

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Feldheiser A, Pavlova V, Bonomo T, Jones A, Fotopoulou C, Sehouli J, Wernecke KD, Spies C. Balanced crystalloid compared with balanced colloid solution using a goal-directed haemodynamic algorithm. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Feb;110(2):231-40. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes377. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23112214 (View on PubMed)

Silva JM Jr, de Oliveira AM, Nogueira FA, Vianna PM, Pereira Filho MC, Dias LF, Maia VP, Neucamp Cde S, Amendola CP, Carmona MJ, Malbouisson LM. The effect of excess fluid balance on the mortality rate of surgical patients: a multicenter prospective study. Crit Care. 2013 Dec 10;17(6):R288. doi: 10.1186/cc13151.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24326085 (View on PubMed)

Perner A, Haase N, Guttormsen AB, Tenhunen J, Klemenzson G, Aneman A, Madsen KR, Moller MH, Elkjaer JM, Poulsen LM, Bendtsen A, Winding R, Steensen M, Berezowicz P, Soe-Jensen P, Bestle M, Strand K, Wiis J, White JO, Thornberg KJ, Quist L, Nielsen J, Andersen LH, Holst LB, Thormar K, Kjaeldgaard AL, Fabritius ML, Mondrup F, Pott FC, Moller TP, Winkel P, Wetterslev J; 6S Trial Group; Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 12;367(2):124-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1204242. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22738085 (View on PubMed)

Cannesson M. Arterial pressure variation and goal-directed fluid therapy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010 Jun;24(3):487-97. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.10.008. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20022261 (View on PubMed)

Ramsingh DS, Sanghvi C, Gamboa J, Cannesson M, Applegate RL 2nd. Outcome impact of goal directed fluid therapy during high risk abdominal surgery in low to moderate risk patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013 Jun;27(3):249-57. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9422-5. Epub 2012 Dec 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23264068 (View on PubMed)

Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, Gillies MA, Blunt M, Ackland G, Grocott MP, Ahern A, Griggs K, Scott R, Hinds C, Rowan K; OPTIMISE Study Group. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014 Jun 4;311(21):2181-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.5305.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24842135 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHUB-fluides

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Voluven® in Paediatric Patients
NCT00860405 COMPLETED PHASE4