Safety and Efficacy of a 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) Solution Versus an Electrolyte Solution in Trauma Patients
NCT ID: NCT03338218
Last Updated: 2022-08-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
238 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-23
2022-06-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) Solution Versus an Electrolyte Solution in Patients Undergoing Elective Abdominal Surgery
NCT03278548
Fluid Resuscitation With Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 in Trauma Patients
NCT03486600
The Effect of Hydroxyethylstarch 6% 130/0.4 in a Balanced Electrolyte Solution (Volulyte®) Compared to Gelatine (Geloplasma®) on Microvascular Reactivity and Tissue Oxygen Saturation During Haemodilution Measured With Near-infrared Spectroscopy
NCT02034682
VolulyteTM in Cardiac Surgery
NCT01553617
Comparison of HES 130 in Balanced and in Unbalanced Solution
NCT01301469
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Volulyte 6%
Volulyte 6% solution for infusion
Volulyte 6%
Solution for infusion
Ionolyte
Ionolyte solution for infusion
Ionolyte
Solution for infusion
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Volulyte 6%
Solution for infusion
Ionolyte
Solution for infusion
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with blunt or penetrating trauma suffering from estimated blood loss of ≥ 500 ml
* Initial surgery deemed necessary within 24 hrs after trauma
* Deferred signed written informed consent form or as locally required
* No signs of intracranial or cerebral hemorrhage
* Administration of less than 15 ml/kg body weight colloid between trauma injury and hospital admission.
Exclusion:
* Hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the other excipients of the Investigational Products
* Body weight ≥ 140 kg
* Patients expected to die within 24h after traumatic injury
* Sepsis
* Burns
* Renal impairment (AKIN stage ≥ 1 or chronic) or acute and/or chronic Renal Replacement Therapy
* Critically ill patients (typically admitted to the intensive care unit)
* Hyperhydration
* Pulmonary edema
* Dehydration
* Hyperkalemia
* Severe hypernatremia
* Severe hyperchloremia
* Severely impaired hepatic function
* Congestive heart failure
* Severe coagulopathy
* Organ transplant patients
* Metabolic alkalosis
* Simultaneous participation in another interventional clinical trial (drugs or medical devices studies)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
B. Braun Melsungen AG
INDUSTRY
European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care
OTHER
Fresenius Kabi
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wolfgang F. Buhre, Prof. Dr. med.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg-ZOL
Genk, , Belgium
Fakultni nemocnice Brno
Brno, , Czechia
Military University Hospital
Prague, , Czechia
CHRU Nancy - Hôpital Central
Nancy, , France
Hôpital de Hautepierre
Strasbourg, , France
Universitätsklinikum Aachen
Aachen, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
Dresden, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
Frankfurt, , Germany
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel
Kiel, , Germany
Academic Medical Center (AMC) Anesthesiology
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
University Medical Center (UMC) Maastricht
Maastricht, , Netherlands
Groote Schuur Hospital
Cape Town, , South Africa
Gama Research Centre Emergency Department, Leratong Hospital
Germiston, , South Africa
Gama Research Centre
Germiston, , South Africa
Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital
Johannesburg, , South Africa
Trident Clinical, Homestead Medical Centre
Kimberley, , South Africa
Steve Biko Academic Hospital
Pretoria, , South Africa
FCRN Clinical Trials Centre
Vereeniging, , South Africa
Clinical Projects Research SA
Worcester, , South Africa
Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Clinico Universitario
Valencia, , Spain
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic la Fe
Valencia, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Palma CD, Mamba M, Geldenhuys J, Fadahun O, Rossaint R, Zacharowski K, Brand M, Diaz-Cambronero O, Belda J, Westphal M, Brauer U, Dormann D, Dehnhardt T, Hernandez-Gonzalez M, Schmier S, de Korte D, Plani F, Buhre W. PragmaTic, prospEctive, randomized, controlled, double-blind, mulTi-centre, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of a 6% HydroxYethyl Starch (HES) solution versus an electrolyte solution in trauma patients: study protocol for the TETHYS study. Trials. 2022 Jun 2;23(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06390-x.
Chappell D, Jacob M. Should hydroxyethyl starch be banned? Lancet. 2018 Jul 14;392(10142):118. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31174-7. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HE06-021-CP4
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
HC-G-H-1505
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.