Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
895 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-05-31
2009-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Injury and lost blood from trauma can cause your body to be in shock (low blood pressure related to blood loss). This decreased blood flow can lead to organ damage. In order to restore the blood pressure and blood flow, the medics give fluids into the patients' veins as soon as possible. This is called "resuscitation." The resuscitation fluid most commonly used is "isotonic" or one that is the same concentration as the blood. The investigators are trying to determine if infusing a "hypertonic" fluid (or one more concentrated than the blood) can increase the blood pressure and restore blood flow more efficiently. The hypertonic fluids the investigators are using are called hypertonic saline with dextran (HSD) and hypertonic saline (no dextran). Hypertonic saline is a salt solution that is slightly more concentrated than your blood. Dextran is a sugar solution.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hypertonic Saline With Dextran for Treating Hypovolemic Shock and Severe Brain Injury
NCT00113685
Field Trial of Hypotensive Versus Standard Resuscitation for Hemorrhagic Shock After Trauma
NCT01411852
Hypertonic Modulation of Inflammation Following Injury
NCT00750997
Low Dose Vasopressin in Traumatic Shock
NCT00420407
Esophageal Echo Assessment of LV Function During Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution Using Crystalloid or Hypertonic Saline
NCT00683007
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Trauma is the leading cause of death among North Americans between the ages of 1 and 44 years. The majority of these deaths result from hypovolemic shock or severe brain injury. Patients in hypovolemic shock develop a state of systemic tissue ischemia then a subsequent reperfusion injury at the time of fluid resuscitation. Conventional resuscitation involves the IV administration of a large volume of isotonic or slightly hypotonic (lactated ringers, LR) solutions beginning in the prehospital setting. Although not conclusive, prior studies have suggested that alternative resuscitation with hypertonic saline (7.5%) solutions may reduce morbidity or mortality in these patients. Furthermore, hypertonic fluids may have specific advantages in the brain-injured patient, as they may aid in the rapid restoration of cerebral perfusion and prevent extravascular fluid sequestration, thereby limiting secondary brain injury. In addition, recent studies have demonstrated that hypertonicity significantly alters the activation of inflammatory cells, an effect that may reduce subsequent organ injury from ischemia-reperfusion and decrease nosocomial infection. The majority of previous clinical trials have focused on the use of HSD. The potential for 7.5% saline alone (HS) to have similar effects has not been well studied. Removal of the dextran component may enhance the anti-inflammatory effects of this solution, which could improve secondary outcomes such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiple organ failure syndrome (MOFS) and rates of nosocomial infections.
This study is a randomized, double-blind, three-arm placebo controlled trial designed to evaluate the clinical outcome of trauma patients with hypovolemic shock, as manifested by prehospital hypotension. Patients will be randomized to a single 250cc IV dose of 7.5% saline in 6% Dextran-70 (HSD), 7.5% saline (HS) or normal saline as the initial fluid for prehospital resuscitation. No additional interventions will occur once the patient is admitted to the hospital. In hospital data collection will last up to 28 days.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
7.5% hypertonic saline/6% Dextran-70 (HSD)
7.5% hypertonic saline/6% Dextran-70 (HSD)
250 cc dose given as a one-time intravenous (IV) bolus in the pre-hospital setting.
2
7.5% hypertonic saline (HS)
7.5% hypertonic saline (HS)
250 cc dose given as a one-time IV bolus in the pre-hospital setting.
3
0.9% normal saline
0.9% normal saline
250 cc dose given as a one-time IV bolus in the pre-hospital setting.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
7.5% hypertonic saline/6% Dextran-70 (HSD)
250 cc dose given as a one-time intravenous (IV) bolus in the pre-hospital setting.
7.5% hypertonic saline (HS)
250 cc dose given as a one-time IV bolus in the pre-hospital setting.
0.9% normal saline
250 cc dose given as a one-time IV bolus in the pre-hospital setting.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Prehospital Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) \<= 70;OR
* Prehospital SBP 71-90 AND Hear Rate (HR) ≥108
* 15 years of age or older, or 50kg or more if age unknown
Exclusion Criteria
* Age younger than 15 or less than 50kg if age unknown
* Ongoing prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
* Administration of more than 2000cc crystalloid or any colloid or blood products
* Severe hypothermia (suspected Temperature less than 28 degrees celsius)
* Drowning or asphyxia due to hanging
* Burns Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) more than 20%
* Isolated penetrating injury to the head
* Inability to obtain prehospital intravenous access
* Time of call received at dispatch to study intervention greater than four hours
* Known prisoners
15 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
NIH
The Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health (ICRH)
UNKNOWN
Defence Research and Development Canada
INDUSTRY
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Data Coordinating Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Myron L Weisfeldt, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alabama Resuscitaion Center, University of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
UCSD-San Diego Resuscitation Research Center
San Diego, California, United States
Iowa Resuscitation Network, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Portland Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium, Oregon Health & Sciences University
Portland, Oregon, United States
The Pittsburgh Resuscitation Network, University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Dallas Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Seattle-King County Center For Resuscitation Research, University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Milwaukee Resuscitation Network, Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
University of Ottawa/University of British Columbia Collaborative RCC, Ottawa Health Research Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Toronto Regional Resuscitation Research Out-of-Hospital Network, University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bulger EM, May S, Kerby JD, Emerson S, Stiell IG, Schreiber MA, Brasel KJ, Tisherman SA, Coimbra R, Rizoli S, Minei JP, Hata JS, Sopko G, Evans DC, Hoyt DB; ROC investigators. Out-of-hospital hypertonic resuscitation after traumatic hypovolemic shock: a randomized, placebo controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2011 Mar;253(3):431-41. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fcdb22.
Tisherman SA, Schmicker RH, Brasel KJ, Bulger EM, Kerby JD, Minei JP, Powell JL, Reiff DA, Rizoli SB, Schreiber MA. Detailed description of all deaths in both the shock and traumatic brain injury hypertonic saline trials of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. Ann Surg. 2015 Mar;261(3):586-90. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000837.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IND #12506 (shock cohort)
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
28226-A - IND 12506
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.