RApid Fluid Volume EXpansion in Patients in Shock After the Initial Phase of Resuscitation.

NCT ID: NCT02645851

Last Updated: 2025-02-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

98 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-16

Study Completion Date

2024-05-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rapid volume expansion using repeated intravenous fluid boluses is a very common intervention performed in the intensive care unit (ICU) in the early days of resuscitation of patients with shock. Once passed the initial phase of resuscitation, the fluid boluses administered fail to effectively increase the patients' cardiac output in about 50% of cases. Pulse pressure changes or stroke volume changes induced by a Passive Leg Raising (PLR) test have acceptable/good ability to predict fluid responsiveness (in terms of cardiac output change) and may be systematically used in patients with persistent shock with the aim of limiting the total amount of fluid administered to patients by avoiding undue fluid boluses. One may suppose that such a volume expansion management policy could impact morbidity and mortality of shocked patients. Among the predictive indices available in clinical practice, the PLR test has the advantages of being usable regardless of the patients' respiratory status and cardiac rhythm. Changes in left ventricular stroke volume during the PLR test perform better that changes in pulse pressure to predict fluid responsiveness. However, in counterpart, pulse pressure changes during PLR can be assessed without the need of other hemodynamic exploration such central venous pressure measurement or cardiac output monitoring. The investigators hypothesized that strategies using either stroke volume changes or pulse pressure changes induced by the PLR test to decide wether a fluid bolus clinically deemed indicated should or should not be administered, may limit the amount of fluid received by the patients during the first 5 days of shock, improve their oxygenation index, and shorten the time passed under mechanical ventilation, as compared to a "liberal" strategy (usual care) that does not use predictive indices of fluid responsiveness.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A pilot, single-center, randomized, open-label, 3 parallel groups clinical trial with 1:1:1 assignment of interventions, comparing outcomes between patients with persistent shock assigned to either 1) the "Volume expansion guided by PLR-induced changes in Stroke Volume" strategy, or 2) the "Volume expansion guided by PLR-induced changes in Pulse Pressure" strategy, or 3) to usual care (i.e., without the use of any predictive index of fluid responsiveness). Patients in shock (either of septic, cardiac or other origin) will be included once passed the first hours of resuscitation. The time window for inclusion will be from 6 to 24 hours after the beginning of resuscitation, a delay necessary to ensure that initial hypovolemia has been fully compensated.

The randomization will be stratified according to the presumed origin of shock (cardiac, septic, or other) and according to the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (\<200 or ≥ 200 mmHg).

The randomly assigned intervention will be used during the first 5 days of shock (120 hours).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shock Hypovolemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

"PLR-induced SV changes" based strategy

During the intervention period (i.e., within 120 hrs following inclusion), every time a fluid bolus is deemed necessary to improve the patient's cardiac output, the final decision to administer or not the fluid bolus will be determined by the percentage changes in Stroke Volume (SV) observed during a 1-min Passive Leg Raising test: Administration of the fluid bolus if SV changes ≥10%, or no administration otherwise. Measurement of beat-to-beat stroke volume by intraarterial pulse contour analysis using the PiCCO system (Pulsion, Germany) will be used to assess stroke volume changes. Per protocol inclusion criteria, patients will be carrying central venous and artery catheters.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

fluid bolus

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of the fluid bolus if deemed clinically necessary, OR if deemed clinically necessary AND PLR-induced SV or PP changes ≥10%, depending of the Arm the patient is assigned to

PiCCO system (Pulsion, Germany)

Intervention Type DEVICE

During the intervention period (from inclusion to the 120th hour), every time a fluid bolus is deemed necessary, fluid responsiveness will be assessed by Stroke Volume changes obtained at 1 min of a Passive Leg Raising (PLR) test (fluid will be given if PLR-induced stroke volume change is over 10%; in case stroke volume change is below 10%, fluid will not be given and need for fluid reassessed after a short period of time, as in usual care)

Vascular pressure transducers (Edwards Life Science, USA)

Intervention Type DEVICE

During the intervention period (from inclusion to the 120th hour), every time a fluid bolus is deemed necessary, fluid responsiveness will be assessed by Pulse Pressure changes obtained at 1 min of a Passive Leg Raising (PLR) test (fluid will be given if PLR-induced Pulse Pressure change is over 10%; in case Pulse Pressure change is below 10%, fluid will not be given and need for fluid reassessed after a short period of time, as in usual care)

Passive Leg Raising test

Intervention Type OTHER

Passive elevation of the legs of the patient, and lying down of the trunk (if patient is in the semi-recumbent position), preferably using electric bed. If not available, elevation of the legs by an assistant to a 45 degrees angle. Effects of Passive Leg Raising on Pulse Pressure or on Stroke Volume are used to assess fluid responsiveness in patients suffering from shock states.

"PLR-induced PP changes" based strategy

During the intervention period (i.e., within 120 hrs following inclusion), every time a fluid bolus is deemed necessary to improve the patient's cardiac output, the final decision to administer or not the fluid bolus will be determined by the percentage changes in Pulse Pressure (PP) observed during a 1-min Passive Leg Raising test: Administration of the fluid bolus if PP changes ≥10%, or no administration otherwise. We will perform measurement of intraarterial blood pressure using vascular pressure transducers (Edwards Life Science, USA). Per protocol inclusion criteria, patients will be carrying central venous and artery catheters.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

fluid bolus

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of the fluid bolus if deemed clinically necessary, OR if deemed clinically necessary AND PLR-induced SV or PP changes ≥10%, depending of the Arm the patient is assigned to

Vascular pressure transducers (Edwards Life Science, USA)

Intervention Type DEVICE

During the intervention period (from inclusion to the 120th hour), every time a fluid bolus is deemed necessary, fluid responsiveness will be assessed by Pulse Pressure changes obtained at 1 min of a Passive Leg Raising (PLR) test (fluid will be given if PLR-induced Pulse Pressure change is over 10%; in case Pulse Pressure change is below 10%, fluid will not be given and need for fluid reassessed after a short period of time, as in usual care)

Passive Leg Raising test

Intervention Type OTHER

Passive elevation of the legs of the patient, and lying down of the trunk (if patient is in the semi-recumbent position), preferably using electric bed. If not available, elevation of the legs by an assistant to a 45 degrees angle. Effects of Passive Leg Raising on Pulse Pressure or on Stroke Volume are used to assess fluid responsiveness in patients suffering from shock states.

Usual Care

During the intervention period (i.e., within 120 hrs following inclusion), every time a fluid bolus is deemed necessary to improve the patient's cardiac output, the fluid bolus will be administered without measurement of any predictive index of fluid responsiveness. Per protocol inclusion criteria, patients will be carrying central venous and artery catheters.

Group Type OTHER

fluid bolus

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of the fluid bolus if deemed clinically necessary, OR if deemed clinically necessary AND PLR-induced SV or PP changes ≥10%, depending of the Arm the patient is assigned to

Vascular pressure transducers (Edwards Life Science, USA)

Intervention Type DEVICE

During the intervention period (from inclusion to the 120th hour), every time a fluid bolus is deemed necessary, fluid responsiveness will be assessed by Pulse Pressure changes obtained at 1 min of a Passive Leg Raising (PLR) test (fluid will be given if PLR-induced Pulse Pressure change is over 10%; in case Pulse Pressure change is below 10%, fluid will not be given and need for fluid reassessed after a short period of time, as in usual care)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

fluid bolus

Administration of the fluid bolus if deemed clinically necessary, OR if deemed clinically necessary AND PLR-induced SV or PP changes ≥10%, depending of the Arm the patient is assigned to

Intervention Type DRUG

PiCCO system (Pulsion, Germany)

During the intervention period (from inclusion to the 120th hour), every time a fluid bolus is deemed necessary, fluid responsiveness will be assessed by Stroke Volume changes obtained at 1 min of a Passive Leg Raising (PLR) test (fluid will be given if PLR-induced stroke volume change is over 10%; in case stroke volume change is below 10%, fluid will not be given and need for fluid reassessed after a short period of time, as in usual care)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Vascular pressure transducers (Edwards Life Science, USA)

During the intervention period (from inclusion to the 120th hour), every time a fluid bolus is deemed necessary, fluid responsiveness will be assessed by Pulse Pressure changes obtained at 1 min of a Passive Leg Raising (PLR) test (fluid will be given if PLR-induced Pulse Pressure change is over 10%; in case Pulse Pressure change is below 10%, fluid will not be given and need for fluid reassessed after a short period of time, as in usual care)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Passive Leg Raising test

Passive elevation of the legs of the patient, and lying down of the trunk (if patient is in the semi-recumbent position), preferably using electric bed. If not available, elevation of the legs by an assistant to a 45 degrees angle. Effects of Passive Leg Raising on Pulse Pressure or on Stroke Volume are used to assess fluid responsiveness in patients suffering from shock states.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

vascular volume expansion Passive elevation of the legs of the patient.

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* In case arterial hypotension is present and/or the patient is already receiving continuous iv vasopressor at ICU admission, the date and time of admission will be considered as the time of shock onset (H0).
* In case arterial hypotension occurs after ICU admission, the date and time of the first episode of hypotension will be considered as the time of shock onset (H0).


* Patients will be eligible for inclusion if 6 hours after H0 (and before H24) all the following conditions are present:
* Informed consent obtained (or emergency inclusion possible when legal representatives and patient's family are not present, as allowed by the Ethic Committee and by the French Law)
* Persistence of arterial hypotension (as defined above) or continuous iv infusion of norepinephrine
* Patient under invasive mechanical ventilation
* At least one of the following conditions is present
* Alteration of consciousness
* Mottling skin
* Cyanosis of the extremities despite SaO2\>90%
* Oliguria defined as urine output below 0.5ml/kg of actual body weight over at least 1 hour
* Arterial lactate \> 2 mmol/L
* ScvO2 \< 70%
* Central venous (internal jugular or subclavian) or femoral venous catheter in place
* Arterial catheter in place

Exclusion Criteria

1. Shock began more than 24 hours ago
2. Age \< 18 yrs.
3. Pregnancy
4. Uncontrolled haemorrhage
5. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in place
6. Patient under veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO)
7. Cardiogenic pulmonary oedema during the past 24 hours
8. Patient equipped with a cardiac output monitoring device
9. Brain death
10. Moribund patient
11. Traction of a lower limb
12. Amputated lower limb above the ankle level
13. Documented intra-abdominal hypertension

13\. Cardiac arrest motivating ICU admission or cardiac arrest since admission 14. Patient without social security number 15. Consent refusal
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thierry Boulain, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, France

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, France

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Annane D, Sebille V, Charpentier C, Bollaert PE, Francois B, Korach JM, Capellier G, Cohen Y, Azoulay E, Troche G, Chaumet-Riffaud P, Bellissant E. Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock. JAMA. 2002 Aug 21;288(7):862-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.7.862.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12186604 (View on PubMed)

Annane D, Sebille V, Duboc D, Le Heuzey JY, Sadoul N, Bouvier E, Bellissant E. Incidence and prognosis of sustained arrhythmias in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul 1;178(1):20-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200701-031OC. Epub 2008 Apr 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18388358 (View on PubMed)

Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ, Chastre J, Hudson LD, Manthous C, Meduri GU, Moreno RP, Putensen C, Stewart T, Torres A. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Apr;33(4):575-90. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0531-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17285286 (View on PubMed)

Benes J, Chytra I, Altmann P, Hluchy M, Kasal E, Svitak R, Pradl R, Stepan M. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R118. doi: 10.1186/cc9070. Epub 2010 Jun 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20553586 (View on PubMed)

Boulain T, Achard JM, Teboul JL, Richard C, Perrotin D, Ginies G. Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients. Chest. 2002 Apr;121(4):1245-52. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.4.1245.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11948060 (View on PubMed)

Boulain T, Garot D, Vignon P, Lascarrou JB, Desachy A, Botoc V, Follin A, Frat JP, Bellec F, Quenot JP, Mathonnet A, Dequin PF; Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Group. Prevalence of low central venous oxygen saturation in the first hours of intensive care unit admission and associated mortality in septic shock patients: a prospective multicentre study. Crit Care. 2014 Nov 6;18(6):609. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0609-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25529124 (View on PubMed)

Boulain T, Boisrame-Helms J, Ehrmann S, Lascarrou JB, Bougle A, Chiche A, Lakhal K, Gaudry S, Perbet S, Desachy A, Cabasson S, Geneau I, Courouble P, Clavieras N, Massanet PL, Bellec F, Falquet Y, Reminiac F, Vignon P, Dequin PF, Meziani F. Volume expansion in the first 4 days of shock: a prospective multicentre study in 19 French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Feb;41(2):248-56. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3576-1. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25447804 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-A00311-48

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CHRO-2015-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Low Dose Vasopressin in Traumatic Shock
NCT00420407 TERMINATED EARLY_PHASE1
Vasoactive Drugs in Intensive Care Unit
NCT02118467 RECRUITING PHASE4