Injection-Assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT ID: NCT02678663
Last Updated: 2017-01-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
164 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-31
2017-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy
NCT00763425
Cold Snare,Hot Snare and APC Polypectomy for the Complete Removal of Small Left Sided Colon Polyps
NCT02479893
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colonic Sessile Serrated Polyps
NCT02967107
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Small Pedunculated Polyps
NCT06097650
Circumferential Submucosal Incision Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Polyps
NCT01369316
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Use of electrocautery is believed to reduce the risk of incomplete resection, although it is less attractive from a safety standpoint due to the risk of complications including delayed bleeding, post-polypectomy syndrome and perforation. Injection of a submucosal solution in order to lift the lesion (injection-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection, EMR) facilitates "hot" resection of sessile or flat neoplasms and allows for a deeper resection margin as compared to conventional polypectomy, while it minimizes electrocautery damage by creating a safety cushion. Despite it is highly efficient, EMR still carries a substantial risk of complications (in most series 7-8%) which has generally limited uptake of the technique among endoscopists for the removal of small polyps.
Therefore, the investigators designed a randomized controlled trial to assess whether injection-assisted cold snare polypectomy may be noninferior to EMR for the resection of small (6-10mm) colorectal polyps.
METHODS
The study will be conducted in the endoscopy units of the Benizelion General Hospital (Heraklion, Crete, Greece) and the Konstantopoulio General Hospital (Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece). Consecutive subjects over the age of 18 years who agree informed consent and who have at least one polyp of eligible size (6-10mm) will be randomly assigned in two groups:
1. Injection-assisted cold snare polypectomy (I-CSP). Polyps in this group will be resected with the cold snare technique after pre-lift of the lesion with a submucosal injection of methylene blue-tinted normal saline solution. The polyp and a small rim of normal tissue will be then snared closely and removed in a single piece without the use of electrocautery.
2. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Polyps in this group will be removed in a single piece by using an "inject-and-cut" EMR technique. Methylene blue-tinted normal saline solution will be injected into the submucosal space followed by the application of snare cautery for lesion resection.
All polypectomy specimens will be retrieved by suctioning into a polyp trap or by using retrieval forceps and send for histopathological examination.
The polypectomy site will be rinsed with tap water and carefully inspected for residual polyp. Targeted biopsies will be obtained from any areas in the polypectomy site margin suspicious for residual tissue. Protrusions in the polypectomy base after I-CSP will be recorded and a biopsy will be taken for separate histological assessment.
Histological evaluation of polypectomy specimens and post-polypectomy biopsy specimens will rely on the criteria of the World Health Organization and will be performed by experienced GI pathologists blinded to the polytectomy technique used and the endoscopic findings.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Injection-assisted cold snare polypectomy (I-CSP)
Polyps in this group will be resected with the cold snare technique after pre-lift of the lesion with a submucosal injection of methylene blue-tinted normal saline solution. The polyp and a small rim of normal tissue will be then snared closely and removed in a single piece without the use of electrocautery.
Injection-assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy
Resection of a polyp after blue-tinted saline injection using a cold snare (without application of electrocautery)
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).
Polyps in this group will be removed in a single piece by using an "inject-and-cut" EMR technique. Methylene blue-tinted normal saline solution will be injected into the submucosal space followed by the application of snare cautery for lesion resection.
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Resection of a polyp after blue-tinted saline injection using snare electrocautery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Injection-assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy
Resection of a polyp after blue-tinted saline injection using a cold snare (without application of electrocautery)
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Resection of a polyp after blue-tinted saline injection using snare electrocautery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Known coagulopathy
* History of liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, malignancy, inflammatory bowel disease, significant infectious disease, polyposis syndrome
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Benizelion General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gregorios A. Paspatis
Director
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Konstantopoulio General Hospital
Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece
Benizelion General Hospital
Heraklion, Crete, Greece
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Papastergiou V, Paraskeva KD, Fragaki M, Dimas I, Vardas E, Theodoropoulou A, Mathou N, Giannakopoulos A, Karmiris K, Mpitouli A, Apessou D, Giannikaki L, Karagiannis JA, Chlouverakis G, Paspatis GA. Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6-10 mm: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2018 Apr;50(4):403-411. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-118594. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1513/3.2.2016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.